Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UKPCM/gladstones Claimform - PCN operator pix - pensby Road **CLAIM DISCONTINUED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 728 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

sounding good. 

I have taken more photos and hopefully made the whole thing clearer.

Image list:

1 – front of the row of shops – indicating parking at rear.
2 – Entrance to rear of shops / parking area
3 – the rear area
4 – rear area

5 – the rear of the restaurant with the “parking at rear” sign on the front of the shop indicating my parked position (parked as such due there being obstructions / rubbish preventing parking closer to the wall)
6 - a parking sign from CPM nothing to do with the restaurant

7 - a parking sign from CPM

8 – No parking bay, designated area, nor road markings of any type.

Quote

 

 

cag phl photos.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

so sigm says for restaurant use only but like any other shop there they dotn have the authority to give away all of the parking spaces that cover the entire block. As CPM wont have any authority to tell peopel how to park anywhere other than on their clients land how are you supposed to identify this land as there are no marked bays etc.

 

They will ahve to show some authority and a lack of signage as you turn into the side entrance that leads to the parking bays makes it impossible to consider anything othwr than the order to park there if using the restaurant and that is confused witht eh vets parking instructions.

 

Even if CPM has a valid contract the confusion wil make it impossible for any one to knwo what is being offered, esp as there is a prohibitive aspect to the offer anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was also hoping to see images of the front of the shops and a view down the whole parade so it is clear that it is a contiguous development and not a number of separately owned buildings. Also if there are any signs out the front we want those to appear in pictures as well. Unless you drive a buklldozer though the building to see where you end uphow are you supposed to know what business the signs refer to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get what you are saying and I really need to file my defence but am still unsure of exactly what it should say? 

 

I have now also taken a picture of the entire row of shops but am Unsure what my 3 line defence should be at this stage. 

 

Sorry to need it completely laying out for me, but I just don’t  Want to get it wrong....

Link to post
Share on other sites

reread this entire thread for starters, it is all here.

Yiou must understand that YOU have to do the work becasue YOU are being sued and YOU will have to attend court and defend yourself. We cant hold your hand and answer questions for you so you have to understand what is going on and it will be better if you write what you think it shoud be and we will offer advice on polishing it up rather than you copy someone else's homework

 

so pointers.

no contract formed because....

no keeper liability, no locus standi as their agreement is with someone who has no authority to enter into such a contract

the signage is unclear/misleading/ not applicable to where your vehicle was at the time

no planning consent for signs

so reread the thread and pick out where these points are made and see what else is said about the whole thing. there will be more detailed points you can make later but you need somehtig to hang the other arguments on

 

I once spent 2 days going through accounts to enable a friend of mine to sue an ex-tenant of his for the correct amoutn as payments over the year had been sporadic and piecemeal.

Once all the accounts were done all he had to do was to show that £x was owed from jan and then another amount from feb ect until you reached the final bill at the end of the year plus the statutory interest. the judge asked him how much in total was owed and he said " I dont know, someone else did all the paperwork"

It is your business to know so best you do as asked and write something dwon. We arent here to belitte you but to hopefully get you to understand what needs to eb doen so it is less scary

Link to post
Share on other sites

post it up here for us to read then.

One point you will need to remember for the actual witness statement. there is no street number that is obvious on either the front or back of the building and that plays to your advantage and the shoddy sign at the front has limited no parking times and says no parking outside designated parking bays. Well, the whole of the rest fo the world would be covered by this idiotic term and there are no marked bays anyway so they are offering nothing to consider and that means you cnat breach thier terms because they have no offer, consideration and acceptance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I thought this case had gone away after posting my defence and hearing nothing back. 

Yesterday I received a

'Notice of proposed allocation to the small claims track'

It tells me 

This is now a defended claim. The defendant has filed a defence but there is no copy enclosed

I have the option if i believe the small claims track to be inappropriate to explain why

It also offers me the opportunity to enter into mediation or settlement.  

What do you advise? 

Many Thanksparking small claims.jpg.pdf

parking small claims.jpg.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

2yrs late?

whats going on here?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case BIDDIDOO have you been notified that the claimant made application to lift the stay before receiving the DQ ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strange that lift stay after 2 years, are they hoping people hae moved so can get a naughty Default?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There cant be a default judgment if the claim was stayed brass...it must follow the normal process of a defended claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not go ring northants bulk and ask why an n180 has been sent almost 2 yrs after the claim was auto stayed

Something is not right here

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy I was thinking if someone moved and didn't iform Court/Claimant and they sent details of intention to try to lift stay and proceed they might try to go for a default if no replies.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

But if your lifting a stay then that implies the claim was acknowledged and a defence submitted....hence no default judgment 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

BIDDIDOO, could you please post up a copy of the defence you filed?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

Why not go ring northants bulk and ask why an n180 has been sent almost 2 yrs after the claim was auto stayed

Something is not right here

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you most probably did get a copy of their application to lift the stay but binned it.....:-D

 

Too late to worry now ...simply complete and file the DQ by date now and lets proceed...although a copy of your defence would be helpful if you still require assistance once this has been allocated.

 

Andy 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...