Jump to content


ppi Abbey national


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 941 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

need some advice if possible its for a friend of mine,

 

she filled in a form for a credit card back in 2001 filled the form in and post it back to the abbey national and in the form she ticked the yes box for the personal protection cover,

she filled the form in the branch,

 

now she tried to claim misold ppi but they have refused her twice as they claim by ticking the ppi box she understood it was optional and it was her decision to purches the ppi,,

 

they also claim they sent out policy documents which confirmed the ppi sale and even if this had not happened they still think you would have found benefits from the policy.

 

can anybody give any advice on how to dispute this please,look forward to any advice thank you.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sar them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The new regulations aim to ensure consummers are treated fairly,

both when they buy ppi and when they complain about being mis-sold the cover,

 

they require providers to talk potential customers through the key features of a policy,

rather than just provide them with some documents giving the information,

while they will also have to be able to show that it was made clear to the consumer that the cover was optional,

so if none of the above then it is classed as missold, so how can a bank ignore that ruling.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

yes but it was probably a non advised sale.

 

once you get all the info

 

scan it up and we'll see.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't 'have' to

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...