Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • First of all welcome to the Forum. Do not worry about Drips+ -a dead sheep has more power so do not let them bother you and never contact them. It is a pity that you wrote to PE  which would be perfectly normal, except with crooks like PE  as you may have revealed you were the driver. You have lost the protection of POF A but it is not a fatal. Please do not even think of paying a penny. The amount may go higher in the short term but when the poor dears do not hear from you they get worried ( because they think to won't pay) do they start sending begging letters and reduce the amount owed.I One of the Site Team will be along shortly and give you a template to fill in which helps us to give you the best advice should they not give up. Just complete the form and post up photos of the signs at the entrance to the hotel and others around the car park and the terms on their ticket machine if there is one.
    • HI   You took possession of the Property in 2010 but when did you end the Tenancy Agreement?   Did you give them the required Notice to end your Tenancy?   You mention you paid a Deposit in 2010, was this returned when you ended the Tenancy?   You need to know exactly what they are claiming money owed is for and surprised that solicitors letter does not mention this.   Send the Landlord a Subject Access Request (SAR) asking for 'ALL DATA'  (ensure to send a copy to the Solicitor acting for them as well. 
    • yes only court...   can I confirm this was settled via Barclaycard and chargeback as it was a debit card, rather than section 75 via a creditcard?  
    • Hi   Sorry for the delay in getting back to you don't worry we have not forgot you.   So they have destroyed ALL DATA personal to you as you did not take the Property. (really they have put there foot in it)   If they hold no personal data then they have NO evidence of what was agreed to with your Holding Deposit and the refusal to return it.   Now if it was me I would let them drop themselves in it even further by responding to there SAR response.   Thank you for your SAR Response dated XX/XX/2019   Due to this response I require clarification of the following:   1. Have you followed the Data Protection Act 2018 & General Data Protection Regulations on Destroying My Personal Data?   2. If you have Destroyed All My Personal Data then what documentation do you hold that I have signed/agreed to the Holding Deposit being Non-Refundable and to provide copies of this documentation.   3. I require a copy of your Policy on Holding Deposits   Please bear in mind the above is what I would do.   I do think it is looking like you may have to go down the court route (make sure and have a good read of that link I previously gave you to the Tenants Fee Act).
    • HI   Firstly the parking in front of your drive, do you have a pavement with a Drop Kerb in front of your property to access your driveway, if so are they infringing on the Drop Kerb? (note your can ask the council to to paint a white line with lines at the end on the road in front of the drop kerb please note there may be a cost from the council to do so)   As for the CCTV look at this ICO link: https://ico.org.uk/your-data-matters/domestic-cctv-systems-guidance-for-people-using-cctv/   Due to the new DPA/GDPR if you have CCTV on your Property and it views outside of that Properties Bounderies they then need to register as a Data Controller with the ICO.   So I would make a Formal Complaint in writing to the Councils Data Controller, ICO (specifically asking if this individual is Registered with them as a Data Controller) & Police, you need to keep a good paper trail of this individuals actions.   I hope this individual knows the Law on Harassment as from your thread that is the impression I get is no matter what you do they will find something else to complaint about.  
  • Our picks

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 329 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Would appreciate if someone could help me.

 

I received a PCN for parking in a restricted road in prescribed hours,

the road I regularly park down, and is not a restricted zone.

 

However, I noticed after checking my car that I was parked on double yellow lines that were covered in leaves on the ground.

The car behind me was not on double yellows and I believe only the front of my car was on the double yellows.

 

These are the pictures of my car.

Is it worth appealing? If so what do I say?

 

Thank you!

C1C4630A-1E40-4642-9909-015A8EE82F35.jpg

BDD2E1C4-F5DC-42B6-A1B1-E604F895A163.jpg

213290D7-8B98-4767-B421-EBCC55F6AFC5.jpg

Edited by dx100uk
spacing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first picture is the best, although I would have taken one from the front as CEO do.

If lines are not visible you have very good grounds for appeal, especially as it seems there's no vertical signage nor marks on pavement, so impossible for a motorist to know about the yellow lines.

I would go all the way.

Councils usually reject all appeals as standard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your response! Do you have an idea on wha wording I should use to appeal? Also, the contravention states ‘being in a restricted zone during prescribed hours’ however that’s not actually what’s happened here, it’s the double yellow lines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One more point of appeal then.

You should state:

The contravention did not occur for the following reasons:

Prescribed hours do not apply at time and date of alleged contravention.

 

If they don't mention the double yellow lines leave them out.

What restrictions are on this road?

Time and days?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In other words it's free parking.

So don't mention the double yellow lines, simply the contravention did not occur.

The CEO pressed the wrong button and messed it up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, my only worry is that the parking officer took photos of the yellow lines that were uploaded after, but the contravention still didn’t occur

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He didn't book you for double yellow lines, he booked you for parking in a restricted zone during prescribed hours which is not correct.

Too bad for his commissions.

They will not cancel the pcn because they never accept any appeal, but then you will win hands down at adjudicator stage which is the next step of appeal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is nonsense advice.

 

"Parked in a restricted street" - code 01 - means double yellow lines. The yellow lines are the restriction.

 

Double yellows do not need "vertical signage" or marks on the pavement.

 

CEOs do not get paid commission. It's nothing to do with "free parking".

 

The contravention DID occur because you contravened the Traffic Order - unintentionally perhaps, but you were still in contravention. If you take the advice and appeal on the grounds that no contravention occured you are certain to lose.

 

You may win an appeal on mitigating circumstances, but the odds are against you. There is an expectation that motorists check what the restriction is - simply not seeing it will rarely win, and to be honest, the idea that you will win hands down at adjudication is ludicrous. You are very unlikely to win if it gets to that stage.

 

Your best bet is to write a polite letter to the Council, explaining the situation and asking for a discreationary cancellation. If they refuse, I would pay the discount at that stage if I were in your position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My mistake, it's a code 01, so above comment is correct.

Appeal on the basis that lines were not visible.

You can't see what's not there, if signs are covered in foliage it's not up to the motorist to sweep the road to find them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...