Jump to content
hollysmum

PE ANPR PCN - Overstay - Grand Harbour Hotel, Southampton **CANCELLED BY PE**

Recommended Posts

I am arguing with Parking Eye over my stay in a hotel car park back in July.

 

I paid £5 for up to five hours parking, not knowing that I could have given my registration number to the receptionist and parked for nothing, as I was using hotel facilities.

I was meeting some colleagues for afternoon tea.

I stayed for 2 hours 36 minutes.

 

I got a Parking Charge Notice telling me I'd overstayed, miraculously found my ticket, and then noted that the machine had only printed £4.50

- I have no idea why, as I most definitely put in five pound coins, but of course, there's no way of proving this.

 

I appealed, Parking Eye rejected that,

I appealed via POPLA, having received a letter from the hotel to send to them confirming that I had been using hotel facilities and that I was, therefore, entitled to complimentary parking.

 

The assessor stated that whilst I had provided evidence that I'd been using the hotel, she'd not seen any evidence that I was entitled to park for nothing, but really, that's exactly what the hotel's letter stated!

 

Unfortunately, a couple of days after receiving this rejection of my appeal, my husband fell seriously ill, and strangely, the PCN moved down my list of priorities.

 

I got a "Letter before Court Action" from Parking Eye dated 31 October, quoting the Barry Beavis judgement to me, which I have no doubt is to try and terrify me into coughing up without delay, but I really don't want to unless I have absolutely no choice

 

I've drafted a letter to them, continuing to point out that I was entitled to park for free regardless of how much I did or didn't put into the ticket machine.

 

What tends to happen with this lot?

Am I right to continue to argue my case?

 

The hotel have tried, without success, to persuade them to withdraw the charge.

 

Thanking you all in advance for any help.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SO youre saying that the landowners told Parking eye to back off and they refused? Id be forming a formal complaint and demand that the landowners ORDER parking eye to back off.


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the hotel will not be the land owners.


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear dx100uk and renegageimp - I will fill out the form as soon as I can. I have just found out that the hotel leases the car park from the local council, who are the landowners.

 

Back later, and thank you so much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just copy n paste the Q's and your answers here

if it council land PPC cant issue speculative invoices..end of


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask the council if they have a contract with PE as a FOI request.

 

When you get the answer "NO" you can use this to beat PE about the head when they try their luck with either a proper lba or a court claim.

 

You have to understand, they arent going to suddenly become reasonable about this just because they are in the wrong.

They lied to the Supreme Court in the Beavis case but got away with it because his team didnt pick it up soon enough.

 

The council wont have a contract with PE so they cant refuse the hotel's instructions and that means you were allowed to be there and they actually owe you a fiver.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the hotel employs PE to look after their car park then PE should do what the hotel tells them! Has the hotel actually contacted PE or just given you a letter to send to them?


Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DX - not even if the Council have leased the land to the hotel? I'm working on posting up the Q&As for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no only the land owner can enter into contracts.


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If the hotel employs PE to look after their car park then PE should do what the hotel tells them! Has the hotel actually contacted PE or just given you a letter to send to them?

 

The hotel told me that they emailed PE yesterday to ask, again, for the charge to be revoked, and got the following response: ‘The motorist paid on the machine for 2 hours, however they stayed on site for 2 hours and 36 minutes. Therefore overstayed.

 

Just letting you know that this case has gone to POPA and the decision has been made in ParkingEye’s favour so we wouldn’t be able to cancel this one if you requested ‘. I should add to this that I actually paid for more than 2 hours, it's just that their dratted machine did not register the full amount I entered, but still issued a ticket.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is looking reasonably promising, DX!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm hoping my answers to the Q&As will appear just below:

 

1. Sunday 15th July 2018

 

2. 18th July 2018

 

3. 20th July 2018

 

4. Yes

 

5. Yes – me entering and leaving, and times

 

6. Yes and yes

 

7. Parking Eye

 

8. Car park adjoining Grand Harbour Hotel, Southampton

 

I appealed via POPLA, Independent Appeals Process.

 

No other correspondence other than the “Letter before Court Action” one dated 31 October.

 

The Hotel have advised me that they lease the land from Southampton City Council, and they have tried, and failed, to get Parking Eye to withdraw the Charge Notice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thread title updated


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you will need to know what the hotel actually did so as for copies of the correspondence . email is the most likely method of them communicating wiht PE so ask for a copy to be forwarded and if they muck you about demand it as a SAR cos it is your personal data.

 

Look up the list of Directors and try phoning and asking to speak to any of them or at least get an email address. Once you get to the top of the tree they may well decide that they can tell PE what to do after all or risk having to fund your battle with them. An Andrew John Fish is the only current director I can find, company secretary is Ms Kelly Adair.

Start being awkward, you cnat breach a contract that doesnt exist even if you fed their parking machine out of the pity you hold for PE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was lucky enough to correspond with someone who appears to be human, ericsbrother, so I'll try her again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would it be reasonable to ask Parking Eye to tell me if they have a contract with the hotel? Or with the local Council?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Grand Harbour won't forward me the email, or at least, the woman I asked tells me she is not authorised to do so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

then ask to speak to either of the 2 people named. Look up their email at ceo email website.

You may ahve got through to a human but they ignored the crux of your complaint and gave a meaningless answer. Be polite but dont take any nonsense as a last word on the matter.

 

 

You dont speak or write to PE, you get the owners to sort out this mess so they know that it will hurt them to continue to allow a bunch of bandits free rein over ther land

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Way to go, ericsbrother - I WAS going to send them a "holding" response, just saying that I was seeking further advice, but I'll hold off whilst I bombard Grand Harbour and perhaps Southampton City Council re land ownership and on what basis Parking Eye operate. Thank you so much for your help so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning,

 

This is a very interesting thread and has a great deal in common with the situation my wife is in at the moment.

 

I have followed hollysmum's lead and provided answers to the standard questions as follows:

 

1. 23 May 2018

 

2. 31 May 2018

 

3. 2 June 2018

 

4. Yes

 

5. Yes

 

6. Have you appealed? - yes

Have you had a response? - yes

 

7. Parkingeye

 

8. Car park at Grand Habour Hotel, Southampton

 

Appealed through POPLA and my wife lost her appeal,

 

The background to my wife's situation is that she attended a meeting at the hotel on the day in question.

 

A function room, together with refreshments and complimentary parking were part of the package that her company had booked.

 

My wife was told that a member of the hotel staff would collect VRNs from the meeting attendees. My wife, and one other person, were somehow missed and her VRN was not listed.

 

My wife did not think any more about it and, during the course of the day, the subject did not arise again. We believe the hotel is at fault and we are disputing this charge on that basis.

 

Having received the PCN, and lost our appeal, we received a 'gesture of goodwill' offer from Parkingeye dated 13 Sept 2018 saying they would accept a £60 payment, which we ignored.

 

As with hollysmum, I contacted the hotel and I have a couple of emails from them confirming that Parkingeye had been contacted and the charge was cancelled.

 

So we were surprised to receive a 'Letter Before County Court Claim' from Parkingeye dated 31 October 2018 (coincidentally the same date as hollysmum's letter).

 

I have replied to this letter confirming that my wife disputes the PCN and she expects Parkingeye to cancel the it, in line with the hotel's request.

 

This week I phoned the person at the hotel that I first emailed my wife's complaint to and she confirmed, verbally, that the PCN should have been cancelled.

 

However, it would seem that she is an intermediary and the complaint would have been handled by someone higher up in the hotel's organisation. I have told her that it is quite likely that I will need written evidence of the hotel's request to Parkingeye and, also, Parkingeye's response.

 

 

I believe that hollysmum and ourselves may be able to share some information that could be mutually beneficial. I was looking into who the car park landowner is looks like you've saved me some digging there.

 

From our side of things, my wife will be attending a two day event at the Grand Harbour Hotel next week (14/15 Nov).

 

The hotel staff member looking after the attendees is the same person I have been communicating with.

 

I intend to prime my wife with requests for specific pieces of information that we will need in our dispute. It may be that being there in person may be more effective.

 

Any suggestions would be gratefully received.

 

For hollysmum, and ourselves, maybe we can find out who the relevant managers/direcors are.

 

By the way, I read that the Grand Harbour Hotel has recently been sold, although I can't see how this would have any bearing on our disputes.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to start a new thread

Of your own...

 

As you say..this thread is for us to advise hollymum


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

3. Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Jazzman1 - what a coincidence!

 

My argument, too, was that, as I was using the hotel's facilities, I would have been entitled to park for nothing, but, because I did not make the booking myself, my manager did it online, and because I only work with this employer one day a week, I think she simply forgot to tell me that I could do so.

 

Also, I put far more than 2 hours worth of money in the ticket machine, whatever printed out on the ticket, and this was the basis of my appeal.

 

My opinion is that they've already made £4.50 out of me which I didn't need to pay anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

try getting your manager to speak to the person who accepted the booking and say that your company expects a refund of £100 to cover each of PE parking claims plus any costs associated with their failure to get the PE notice cancelled including the £5 you actually paid.

 

One problem many people have is not throwing stone high enough up the tree.

 

However, often when a small person goes to the top they get ignored as being beneath contempt so then you have to use publicity to cause them a little humiliation. Any dent in their public image usually gets a result.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had thought of this, too, ericsbrother - she actually left in September, so I'm a bit stuffed on that.

 

However, I will be writing to the manager of the hotel myself, and also to Southampton City Council, who appear to actually own the land.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?





  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The part that I have highlighted in bold, I think it's not quite right.   I don't believe that if a consumer took a dealer to court, with the defect being a blown bulb, 25 days after taking ownership, they would win. Or else, people could just decide they didn't like the car anymore, put a knackered bulb in the car and reject it.   The severity of the defect does matter.   It needs to render the car not fit for purpose, not as described, or not of satisfactory quality. That's what defines whether a defect is really a defect or  not. Small but subtle point that needs to be clear to people reading the forum I think. Otherwise, people may think they can take a car back for any old reason.    
    • whatever it was you need the date and the rebate. then you enter that as a MINUS figure in the spready same as a PPI payment on the date they made it.  
    • Thanks dx, one more question 😕   the final payment I paid 6014.71 after 6 months, presumably because the ppi was front loaded and the loan was only 5000 that final payment included the rest of the total ppi (1174 added at the beginning)   if i got a rebate would it of shown on the statement as i cant remember from so many years ago!? 
    • Sangie5952   Thanks that has clarified what the ET1 form represents. We haven't made disclosures yet so I can include the relevant evidence then. Appreciate your help many thanks.  
  • Our picks

    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
      • 0 replies
    • 30 Day Right To Reject - Vehicle Casualty Report. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415585-30-day-right-to-reject-vehicle-casualty-report/
      • 57 replies
×
×
  • Create New...