Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I would welcome some advice please.  I have been a CAG member for some time and you have helped in many ways.   Way back in October 2007 I took out a loan with Black Horse Finance for £4,000 to pay for a new central heating system that I was forced to install when I had to move into an old mid-terraced house.  The problems with this house got worse over the years and in October 2012 the account was assigned to MEIV who traded under the name Marlin. Also at that time my affairs were being handled by a Debt Management Company.  This company, Money Worries, subsequently disappeared with the MD being chased by Greater Manchester Police.  There followed a long and painful period with Marlin whereby they constantly stated there was no payment plan and I stated that there was.  They claimed no payments had been received and it was down to me to try and sort the mess out.  I said at the time that I would maintain the same payment as I had been to the DMC which was £12.25 per month.  So I implemented a Standing Order to this effect.  Marlin, of course, wanted an Income / Expenditure form so they could (obviously) try and pressure me to pay more.  I wrote to Marlin saying their actions could amount to harassment but they continued to maintain there was no agreement and passed the account over to their so-called "solicitors", Mortimer Clarke.   So in April 2014 enter Mortimer Clarke who were still, like Marlin, just agents.  As 'solicitors' they started threatening legal action, enclosed an Income / Expenditure form and demanded that I fill it up - effectively disclosing all.  A month later they wrote saying their 'client' had told them to start legal proceedings but actually nothing happened, maybe because it was already beyond 6 years.  They threatened CCJs and credit being "impacted" etc.  So I discover that Marlin had actually increased the debt by £500 by slapping on punitive interest. After finally getting them to realise that there was a plan, whether they liked it or not, they removed the interest. I then made a reasonable offer, I felt, to increase the monthly payment to £20.  They came back again demanding their sacred Income / Expenditure form.  So thanks to CAG I informed them about 'reasonable' offers of payment and Court Protocol rules and just went ahead and implemented the £20 a month. Back they came saying the offer had been accepted on a "concessionary" basis - whatever that's supposed to mean. In March 2016 they seemed more reasonable and continued the £20.   In October 2018 they try their tactics again and I respond with a strongly worded letter about harassment and follow through on my telephone promise to increase the monthly payment to £25.  Surprise, surprise, this is accepted!  All is then peaceful and calm until February this year when they start again.  As things are somewhat better for me the monthly payment is increased to £60 but now in September they're back again.  Now I know you will say I'm foolish but this time I completed their damn Income / Expenditure form but again, foolishly, I gave them figures based on our total family income.  I am retired as a full-time carer to our disabled son.  My wife is in paid employment but wants to build up savings to start a business idea that she has every chance of succeeding in. I gave them global figures for total Income and Expenditure as how much pocket money I give my son is of no relevance!   They are now saying on the basis of the figures I gave them that I have £494 disposable income and that their 'client' (i.e.MEIV) wants the monthly payment to rise to £345.80.  I am furious.  They have given me 14 days to accept ......or else!!   I am thinking I should do a new IE form based solely on my income and the expenses I pay each month but I thought I would come to you guys first.  If this were to go through it would leave us, as a family, with not much over a £100 to cope with emergencies.   Many thanks in anticipation.    
    • Has a check been made with the local Council Authority regarding the land ?   Usually Councils will have charts showing the land/boundaries in their area.   I know local to where I live there is land with disputed ownership, as documents are missing. There is then a claim process through land registry which you are going through. Because the land was not claimed or part of the property purchase 5 years ago, I believe that land registry are correct, that the landlord would have a 12 year period in which to register a claim for the land. Land registry won't as far as I know actually contact the landlord to make them aware. It would be up to landlord to find out.   There may be a process for there to be an agreement made between Mum and landlord now. Depends on how reasonable the landlord is. But there may be a cost involved in this process drawing up legal agreement for landlord to waive any rights to claim ownership of the land.  Seek formal legal advice from someone qualified to see if this is possible and if so how much legal fees would be.
    • Hi not sure if I'm posting in the right place here so apologies if I'm not. I don't know if anyone can help but basically my mum has been living in her house since 1997 and there is a piece of land that she has used and looked after since moving in there.she was a tenant in the house until she bought it around 5 years ago. She has recently tried to claim the land through the land registry (possessor title I think) however she had something back from them saying her landlord from when she was renting would be allowed to claim the title for the land or she would have to start her 12 years wait again from.when she purchased the property. Is there anyone that can give some.advice on this as I don't see why her previous landlord could.claim the land when they weren't the ones looking after it. Any advice is appreciated. Thankyou
    • Northampton has lost a host of major retailers, but independent traders say it has a bright future.View the full article
    • I think the most important thing here is to establish a paper trail. You have the right to return it within 14 days for any reason – the cooling off period. Also if there is a defect which manifests itself within the first 30 days then you have a right to reject the computer for that defect. I suggest that you write letter immediately – email – send it to them and make it clear that you are invoking the cooling off period and that despite your best efforts you have been unable to obtain an address from them and in fact you have found that both their staff and the systems are obstructive to your application of your consumer rights. Send a second email (they aren't normally able to understand one point per email – they get confused) and tell them that you are invoking your right to reject under the consumer rights act because of a defect and you want to know what arrangements they are making to collect the computer. Send both of these letters today. I suggest that the cooling off period one you also sent by recorded delivery post tomorrow but make sure it bears today's date. In terms of the defect, I suggest that you start going to the setup process again if you can and take a photograph of each screen so that you are able to demonstrate the defect. If Dell tries to shirk their consumer obligations then you will have evidence that there was a defect and after that we will help you through the next step.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

PPM PCN 4.11AM!! - residential parking space - no permit displayed


Rj44
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 241 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, (I hope i am posting this in the correct space and apologies to admins if im not)

 

I appreciate any help this forum/users can offer in advance.

 

I live in a new development (I rent been here for 4/5 years), I have an allocated space as per my tenancy agreement.

 

Recently (September) the management company introduced a new scheme by appointmenting P&P Management Ltd to regulate the parking of our development.

 

However the problem here is, instead of regulating the cars that park outside of bays (they don't have the legal right because the road is owned by the council) they now ticket cars in the private bays that don't display a permit issued by P&P Management Ltd.

 

We received a letter informing us that unless we send back the display permit and send an email to opt out we would be accepting any rules set by P&P. Like most, work, life etc got in the way and i forgot to send back the permit and write an email.

 

Low and behold i eventually received a ticket. I explained that I posted the permit back (must of got lost in the post....) and explained I didnt realise had to email as well. Nevertheless i also explained that I didnt give the management company nor the P&P to regulate my space, neither did my landlady. I followed their appeals process and they have written back to say in short, I owe them £60 going up to £100 if its not paid by a certain date.

 

Ultimately what im trying to understand is can they chase me, if they can what are the chance of the courts finding this case in their favour.

 

I've read that a Penalty Charge Notice is different from a Parking Charge Notice (Which is what they issued me with).

 

I'm happy to tell them with a few choice words where they can go and see them in court, but I also want to know if its worth just suffering the £60 and them now understanding and knowing I no longer participate in the scheme (not that I did anyways) and the situation being done with.

 

Appreciate this is long winded but thanks again in advance for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

please complete this:

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket

 

its in your lease, they'd lose hands down...rights of supremacy of contract..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for taking the time to reply, I didn't receive a Penalty Charge it was a Parking Charge, should I still fill out the form and post it here?

 

Apologies if this is a stupid questions, forums etc are new to me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

we know that....

copy and fill out the relevant q's to here and answer each q at its end.[windscreen or ANPR ]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

The link provided is for private parking tickets.

 

 

Without seeing any tickets which I would hope you will upload in pdf format it's hard to say what is likely to happen. I'm also assuming this was a windscreen ticket.

 

 

Was the company employed without any consultation?

 

 

As it stands, you have supremacy of contract as you have an allocated space within your lease. You do not have to show any permits whatsoever if you wanted to.

 

 

This parking company is a one man band and are quite likely to take court action (249 cases so far this year)

 

 

You could appeal to them if you wish but as they are members of the IPC, they will likely reject your appeal and after that it's pointless appealing further to the IAS as they are an 'old boys club' who are on the side of the parking company.

 

 

I would suggest that you appeal the first time and when they reject you, write back to them stating that should they wish to take court action, you will defend in full. Don't involve the IPC at all.

 

 

Hold fire for other opinions and if you can, let us see the ticket (suitably redacted of personal details and bar codes/reference numbers)

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

as your parking space is allocated to the property PPM have no authority to trespass on your vehicle to slap their ticket on it.

They may well say that they sent you a letter but that has as much value as me sending you a letter saying you have to sell your car to me for a £1 or i will sue. ( needless to say there is case law on this so they are stuffed)

 

Now they are there because the management co have invited them to be there.

They cant make any money out of people parking on the road so rely on inventing false reasons to chisel the residents out of cash.

the problem is that many will pay up and thus encourage this stupidity when a group action telling the to get lost would have been the end of it ( if everyone returned the permit they wouldnt have a chace at inventing a reason to be there)

 

Now, as they have issued a ticket for your vehicle you can wait and see what they do next and if it isnt the correct procedure they are stuffed by the law on private parkingas well as contract law.

 

Chances of court finding in their favour?

almost zero but that wont stop them trying because 85% of all court claims go undefended so it is a numbers game for them.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

For a windscreen ticket (Notice To Driver) please answer the following questions....

 

1 The date of infringement? 12/10/2018 @ 04:11

 

2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] - Yes

 

have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days]

what date is on it

Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? No

 

3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?]

 

4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK,

did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process?

[it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances]

 

5 Who is the parking company? Parking & Property Management Ltd

 

6. where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? - In my private space, allocated to the flat I rent.

 

 

I hope I have filled that all in correctly.

 

Thanks again in advance for any help.

Parking Charge.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st page is a bit too pixelated..

 

04:11!!

are there photos of that?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We received a letter informing us that unless we send back the display permit and send an email to opt out we would be accepting any rules set by P&P. Like most, work, life etc got in the way and i forgot to send back the permit and write an email.

 

I don't understand what happened. Send back what permit? Can you clarify please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They first made contact by sending a letter to all residents of the scheme basically saying in short 'return the permit attached and send an email to opt out of the scheme'. I sent the permit they provided back but they reckon they never received. I was naive enough to send normal 1st class with no proof of tracking.

 

I didn't email until I had received the above PCN. I will attach an image of the letter tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thread title updated

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm even more confused now!

 

The Managing Agent sent all residents a parking permit and said that if you didn't want to take part in their parking permit scheme you should return it and confirm you wanted to opt out.

 

So if they had received the permit back from you and the email confirming your opt out what then did they claim would have been the position? You could use the allocated space without a permit? You couldn't use the space at all? They'd take the space away?

 

Did the permit they sent you have your car reg number on it? (Presumably not, how would they know what it was?). The number of the allocated space? Or just the name of the development?

Link to post
Share on other sites

All of which doesn't matter..

Supremacy of contract over rules the lot

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would imagine from the opt out would mean that the parking space would not be covered so if an unauthorised car parked there, the parking company would take no action.

 

 

I find it disingenuous of PPM to say they didn't receive the permit back. That is the answer most would give when they did get the letter but don't want to acknowledge it. My opinion only. Why would any company accept an opt out when it is a potential money earner from it.

 

 

The parking scheme is supposed deter irresponsible parking, not the lawfully held parking space.

 

 

 

You are under no obligation ever to display due to primacy of contract. You were there before they were!

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 things, you rejected ther invite to be bound by their terms and also you have the right to park where you did without interference by them.

 

Now normally we would advise against appealing the receipt of a ticket slapped on a car but as this is about YOUR space you can show that you have tried to be reasonable but the parking co arent interested in your rights, they need to rob and cheat people to stay in business.

 

saying they did nt get the permit back cuts no ice with the law, it was deemed delivered and anyways,they have no rights to demand anything from you.

 

If the permit is supposedly their property they should ahve provided a prepaid envelope for its return or allowed you to glue it to the forehead of the idiot at the managing agents that signed them up in the first place.

 

Now the MA and the parking co will claim that they have done this with good intentions, protecting your parking space from random motorists but the reality is that they know this isnt where the money is.

 

If you sent a letter with the returned permt this would be helpful for burying them later but not essential.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PPM lost when they tried court in similar circumstances details on Parking Prankster blog

 

 

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2017/03/parking-and-property-management-ltd.html

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

PPM lost when they tried court in similar circumstances details on Parking Prankster blog

 

 

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2017/03/parking-and-property-management-ltd.html

 

 

Almost exact circumstances so thanks for the link.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rj44, every time someone posts on here about parking schemes being imposed where a leaseholder has an allocated space lots of people pop up claiming that the scheme can't be introduced because of so-called "supremacy of contract".

 

But this is only partly true. In fact it's common for leases to say that use of the allocated space is subject to any regulations that the freeholder/lessor/management company might make for the use of the parking spaces.

 

If the lease for your development says something on those lines the management company may have the power to introduce parking permit schemes. Although if they have it was curious way to go about it, hence my earlier question. I appreciate you may have no idea what the lease say as you are not the leaseholder, your landlady is.

 

Of course even if such a clause is in the lease it won't automatically mean the PPC can do what they like. There are other things that have to be got right as well, not least the procedure for introducing it, the signage, how they issued the PCN etc.

 

They often get that wrong. And taking a case to court requires the PPC to prove in writing that it has the authority from the freeholder/leaseholder to issue PCNs and they often fail to do that either.

 

But you cannot say that if you have an allocated space under the lease the management company can never introduce a parking permit scheme. The actual wording of the lease has to be taken into account. Yes the wording of the lease is paramount, but it might allow the management company to introduce a permit scheme.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Thanks again for all responding, finding your feedback very helpful.

 

see attached the letter initially sent by PPM.

 

Am I right to assume and ignore all further correspondence from them as they don't have a leg to stand on?

 

Does it matter that I rent the property? My landlady hasn't responded or accepted their terms either, im the only one whose has interaction with them and have lived there since the property was built. (approx 4/5years)

 

I have a copy of the permit and again will upload in due course.

Parking Letter.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well PPM claim that covenants in the lease permit the managing agent to introduce this scheme. Whether that's true would have to be established.

 

 

Why did you send the permit back and tell them you wanted to opt out of the scheme? They sent you a free permit and said if you don't display it you will get a PCN. I can't see what the disadvantage to you would have been to simply stick it in your car and avoid the potential hassle you now have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I own more than one car, and the inconvenience of taking a permit out every time I or my partner or family/friends park in my space or even having to buy additional permits (£10 a pop) also didn't seem fair.

 

As I mentioned, I have lived there a number of years and never had an issue with someone parking in my space, its always been (and the reason they introduced the PPM to begin with) the people who park opposite the spaces which turned out to be council owned land that they couldn't regulate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ethel if OP or randomer had parked a pushbike in the bay bet PPM would have ticketed it. One thing is sure it's a minefield and untangling the legalese and other bits of a lease agreement is time consuming.

 

 

Without seeing the Lease we can't say definitively whether anything in there can be subordinate to a PPC.

 

 

And a PPC lost a court case on virtually identical facts.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, you opted out so they cant look after your health and safety whilst you are parked in your own space. If you think they could ensure your health and safety if only you had a permit you live in crazyworld along with the managing agents but that is by the by.

 

When you became a tenant you take on all of your landlords rights and responsibilities (with some exceptions).

 

contracts by lethargy arent fair or enforceable (or even completed) contracts as there must be acceptance so there reversal of the requirement that you must agree to something is unlawful.

 

Very old case law on it about a man who wanted to buy a horse an said if he didnt hear back by noon he would assume offer accepted.

Felthouse V Bindley 1862

 

So ignore the idiots unless they decide they want to lose some money on a court case. If they continue to ticket you can go after them for harassment as they have now got a letter saying they arent welcome to trespass on your space.

 

Again there are some good examples of this such as Davey v UKPC ( see both that and UKPC v Davey for full story)

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...