Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks,    I've read the info from the link, nothing I wasn't aware of really. I wouldn't talk to a DCA anyway or anybody else over the phone for just about anything, hence the reason I refused to give them my details when they rang up. The only "conversation" I had was when they rang me and asked me to confirm my details, which I refused to do because it could have been anybody on the phone and as I said, I'd never heard of them anyway at that point. I asked them to contact me in writing, if they wished to pursue the matter, with "a copy of the Agreement" and the reply was that "there isn't one". At that point I said "we have nothing more to discuss then" and ended the call.    I'm still not happy about posting the entire details online but I'll take a look at some of the other threads to see if there's anything relative. 
    • Looks like my mistake. The new machine requires the full reg to be entered now, whereas before, only the first two numbers were required. I entered the first two numbers.
    • Reciveed a summary warrant, phoned up the council who said it was not longer anything to do with them and I'd have to speak to walker love the firm who deal with their summary warrants. I said I wouldn't have anything to do with them becasue it looks like a dodgy dca and I  I don't trust them, the debt is with the council not walker love. Anyway turns out they have no record of an arrangement to pay last years outstanding amount so whatever's gone wrong they have cancelled this years installments, even though regular payments have been made, they then took a summary warrant for last years and this years outstanding amount. I've cleared last years outstanding amount to the council and have a payment reference number, and the council say they'll make contact regarding a single person's discount  which was missed and then calculate the payments for the rest of this year. They say they sent out three letters threatening the summary warrant which were not received. Now to my question, my argument that the debt was with the council and not walker love, and as I've paid and agreed to pay what and the council say they'll contact walker love and stop the action, is this correct or will walker love still pursue? 
    • I'm trying to get my head around this. In effect, over the years you have been paying your own bill for yourself and also the bill for your neighbours usage as well – as metered. At the same time your neighbours have been paying their own water bills based on an SS charge. This means that Yorkshire water have been receiving double for your neighbours water. Now they are proposing to return to you the portion which which they now say represents the amount of water used by a neighbour. I think it would be interesting to talk to your neighbours and see if you can get copies of their bills over the years. Our Yorkshire water proposing to return to you the same amount of money that they charge your neighbours? Even if your neighbours don't have all of their bills to hand, maybe they've got one or two bills available and if it looks as if there is a discrepancy then maybe your neighbours would be kind enough to send the water company and SAR as well. I don't know if I have suggested that you read our customer services guide – but if I haven't then you should do so and implement the advice there in case you have any telephone dealings with the auto company. You haven't said whether you want to have a metered supply or to have an SS charge. Please let us know because it makes a big difference to the final solution you will be looking for. If you want to metered supply then I think you are absolutely entitled to insist on it and you are entitled to insist that Yorkshire water and if this is in your garden, they should then pay for any repairs.
    • Not sure if this is the correct forum, so I apologise in advance.   So, the situation I am currently in.. is that a family member opened a Littlewoods account in my name, at the address I used to live at (Family home). The account was opened in November 2018, goods were obtained and then payments were missed. I usually check my credit report and score every month, but (somewhat foolishly) I didn't bother checking for a few months as my score remained the same. I didn't notice this account on my report until several months after it was opened. I obtained statutory credit reports and went through everything. I then filed this issue with Action Fraud.   I contacted Littlewoods and explained the situation to the fraud team, re-iterating the fact that an account was opened at an address I had not lived at for almost two and a half years at the point that this account was opened, not to mention the account is under a 'Mrs', when I am male. They proceeded to tell me that it was a civil matter and not one for them to deal with. I told them that the amount owed wasn't the issue, but rather the adverse effect it was having on my credit score as I was considering applying for a mortgage soon. They simply doubled down on their 'civil matter' point and hung up on me.    I got in touch with Experian, who added a notice of correction to the entry on my report and provided a template for me to send off to Shop Direct. I sent this letter off and received zero response. The family member had started to make payments after I threatened reporting this to the relevant people, but the account, and the several months of missed payments, still remain as a black mark on my credit file. I will add that I got a CIFAS marker placed on my account to try and prevent this sort of thing from happening again in the future.   I have also filed this issue with the Financial Ombudsman. I guess I am posting this because I am not quite sure where to go next or what my next actions should be to get this removed from my credit report. It is incredibly disappointing that a family member would do this to me, but it is also extremely annoying that Littlewoods themselves have been very unhelpful in trying to rectify this issue that has occurred at such a point in my life when I am considering applying for a mortgage. Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated.   Thank you.
  • Our picks

Bluelagoon123

Myparkingcharge excel windscreen red notice - Stockport peel centre

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 256 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Registered to follow this as I'm going through the same thing as of today. I've tried to read all the newbie threads but they're confusing so hoping this will give some clarity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

start a new thread as your circumstances may seem the same but theire may be differences in such areas as where the vehicle was at the time etc so please tell us the whole story with dates and times etc. We dont need to know about you granny needing the toilet, that isnt a contratual issue, just mitigation and these people dont give a monkeys becasue it is all about the money for them.

Registered to follow this as I'm going through the same thing as of today. I've tried to read all the newbie threads but they're confusing so hoping this will give some clarity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

I found this notice on windscreen had parked in disabled bay without Blue badge with an elderly disabled person and paid and displayed a ticket.

Showed the office the bb but was told to appeal instead seemed a bit dodgy to me as he saw the evidence he should have cancelled this notice or whatever it was.

 

I went on the site and it's asking for serial number etc .

Not sure if I should appeal to their better side by explaining the circumstances because it doesn't seem like they have one!

 

This was in Stockport peel centre. The only thing I have done as of yet is emailed to maxx as that's where I made a purchase.

 

I've read through alot so know to ignore till k get a PCN to keep ( which I hope I don't) but not sure what to do when I get that through post.

15402943927024636834870059655020.jpg

15402944938501301591490820664805.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For a windscreen ticket (Notice To Driver) please answer the following questions....*

 

1 The date of infringement? 22/10/18*

 

2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?]* No

 

if you have then please post up whatever you sent and how you sent it and the date you sent it,*

suitably redacted. [as a PDF- follow the*upload guide*

 

has there been a response?*

please post it up as well, suitably redacted. [as a PDF- follow the*upload guide]

 

If you haven't appealed yet - ,.........

 

have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days] NO

 

what date is on it*

Did the NTK provide photographic evidence?*

 

3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?]*

 

4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK,*

did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process?*

[it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances]*

 

5 Who is the parking company? Excell

 

6. where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park?* Peel centre Stockport

......................... ....*

Edited by dx100uk
format

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you await the NTK

in the meantime get reading those threads above.

 

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

oh dear they are then claiming this was an ANPR camera capture, which ofcourse it wasn't...bang they've shot themselves in the foot, they should have waited 29-56 days.

 

can you scan up the NTK to PDF please

read upload


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days]*Yes after 9 days

 

what date is on it* 31/10/18

Did the NTK provide photographic evidence?* Yes

3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?]* It mentions regulations 2012

 

Did that work ?

 

Dear lord this attachment business is hard work ! Lol

car pdf 3.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

aha the old peel centre 100's of thread here on this pleace

 

can you put the times and dates BACK in your scan please

just obscure anything pers like reg/name/address/ref no's.

 

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is strange I posted the amended pdf hours ago and have been waiting a response only to now find it wasn't posted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry me internet went down

I tidied the thread and moved the corrected version to you above post.

 

this will be an interesting case as they've used operator pictures to claim it was an ANPR capture when it wasn't so have jumped the gun with the NTK and shot themselves in the foot.

 

if you use our search cag box of the top red toolbar and type in peel centre

you see lots to read

the experts will be along Monday.

 

best to also keep to your own thread

I noticed you'd posted to a JLA airport thread, which is of no relevance to you at the peel centre as airports are gov't by byelaws so I remove that to stop confusion.


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was just an extra large bay that's all I saw . The car reg is taxed disabled too which they should know if they use ANPR?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And there were no exceptions so a ticket had to be paid for which it was so doesn't make sense to lump a notice to the customer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they didn't use ANPR and even if they did it wouldn't show as disabled anyway...


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

have you read any of those other peel centre threads...?


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are lots of reasons why the demand isnt lawful, the car reg being one of them

- they wont have bothered to check but even if they did they are just too greedy to give a toss, they want your money and that is all they care about.

 

another is that blue badge scheme doesnt apply to off street parking but the stores have to have disabled parking or they get clobbered by the council and dont get planning consent.

 

Now in scotland the blue disabled parking plates do mean somehting so that means a paint job isnt enough to make a disabled bay legally enforceable regardless of what the council planning people want.

 

the method used to send their demand is dubious as it relies on an interpretation of the law that wasnt intended and certainly the slapping of the red ticket makes it look like one method is being used so they should follow that protocol.

they dont because it delays them grabbing the money and they dont rely on keeper liability anyway so why pretend to follow the law?

 

for this last reason it is wise to still say nothing until 2 months have passed since the issue of the red screen damaging blurb.

now that would be an interesting challenge, as they arent issuing you with a deamnd why are they placing anything on the car and risk being sued because they cant use any of the info inside the envelope as evidence.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...