Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Asset/TM Claimform - old disputed {OC upheld IRL complaint] lending stream PDL Debt.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1922 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I foolishly got a pay day loan a couple of years ago from lending stream, circumstances changed and I couldn’t pay it.

 

 

The debt was then sold onto asset collections who have instructed tm legal.

debt is 997 and made up of two loans.

They sent me a letter of claim which I responded to but didn’t send recorded post and they claim they didn’t get it.

 

They have now issued court papers to pursue a ccj.

 

I have contacted them to discuss my options and they say either pay in full or If I want to pay in instalments they will get a ccj.

 

I desperately want to avoid a ccj but can’t afford to pay it in full and even less so now they have added fees and interest the debt is now 1300.

 

What do I do? Can I defend the claim?

What happens is I lose?

 

I made an affordability complaint to lending stream earlier this year where they found that one of the loans was unaffordable and they said they would buy it back from asset collections and waive all interest, they havnt done this though and tm legal are pursuing the full debt.

 

Do I have any options?

The clock is ticking though as I got the claim forms yesterday

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Assett collections and investigations

 

Date of issue – 16th October

 

Date to submit defence - 16/11

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.The claimant claims amount in respect of an unpaid loan regulated by consumer credit act.

Loan was funded by gain credit plc trading as lending stream.

2.Defendant failed to make payments in accordance to agreement. Credit agreement was assigned and notice of assignment was sent to defendant. The claimant issued letter of claim providing a further opportunity to arrange repayment to no avail.

 

3.The claimant claims interest under section 69 at the rate of 8% 17/10/16- 15/10/18 plus daily interest at 0.22 daily

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes letter of claim I offered to pay 20 a month. They claim they got no response

 

What is the total value of the claim? 1306.08

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Payday loan

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Yes

Why did you cease payments? In 2016

What was the date of your last payment? Unsure

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? I raised an affordability complaint. They agreed to buy back half of the loan and cancel interest but haven’t done and court papers are for full amount

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management Yes I did

Edited by dx100uk
format
Link to post
Share on other sites

please note your corrected defence filing date...

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CCA Request running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

type your name ONLY

 

no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need to hit reply with quote ...just type.

 

quote removed

unnecessary posts now removed...

 

yes and yes to your questions.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cag is self help too

time to get reading but DO NOT miss your defence filing date no matter what happens or not

 

use the search CAG box of the top red toolbar

 

claimform asset

 

1000's of like asset claimform threads here already

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

lots for you to digest, and yours looks promising that atleast their claim sum is somewhat sceptical

 

when the time comes nearer have a go at a defence pop it up here in good time and we'll help.

 

also gather the evidence you have regarding the IRL complaint and p'haps pop it all into ONE multipage PDF

read UPLOAD.

 

then we can better see the details there and use that evidence to adapt the defence you put up.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So following my post last week

 

I emailed lending stream to ask why they didn’t re purchase the loan as per outcome of my affordability complaint.

 

Asset are pursuing the ccj for both loans (but are classing them as one on the court docs).

 

Lending stream replied today to say was an oversight on their part and they will buy it back and wipe any charges. I can then make an arrangement with them.

 

They obviously don’t know about Court process being started.

How will this affect things?

They are only buying back 300 of 997 balance from asset.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly proof that invalidates what asset are claiming...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Am in the process of getting my defence together and submitted-I have till Friday.

 

Since I received the court docs lending stream have bought one loan back from asset, cancelled the interest and agreed a repayment plan of £10 per month.

 

I can’t understand how asset let them buy it back when they are pursuing a CCJ for the full amount of two loads plus interest?

 

How do I put this in my defence?

 

Appreciate any help anyone can offer

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Look

You need to put Asset Collection and Investigation to Strict Proof that they Actually own the alleged debt by Transfer.

You need to see or be in receipt of a copy of the Deed of assignment and you need to re-enforce this in your Defence.

A letter of assignment is just that. A letter.

Its not proof that it has been properly Assigned.

 

I have been through 2 claims with the company for the same,

 

each time I have raised the issue in my defence they have backed of from providing a full deed and the claim has not progressed.

 

In two of the claims I have asked A.C.I to prove that they own the Debt in question, and twice they have failed to do so...

 

In the Two claims they have made they have Provided 4 different assignments with at least 3 different dates between so called asignments. and lots of emails quoting their clients...... Well either they own the debt or they are managing on behalf of lending stream.

 

They can not be both.

 

Do you have an assignment from ACI back to lending stream ?

 

I suspect the Answer is no..

... Why....

.. Because it was not legally Assigned in the first place ????

 

Hence Asset Collections have no legal court claim

Edited by dx100uk
Merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

Am in the process of getting my defence together and submitted-I have till Friday.

 

Since I received the court docs lending stream have bought one loan back from asset, cancelled the interest and agreed a repayment plan of £10 per month.

 

I can’t understand how asset let them buy it back when they are pursuing a CCJ for the full amount of two loads plus interest?

 

How do I put this in my defence?

 

Appreciate any help anyone can offer

 

Did you submit a defence ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

This Is my Opinion Andyorch, Asset collections and investigations are not the owners or debt buyers of these Alleged Debts.

 

In Fact one would go so far as to suggest that they are of the same company..

 

1) Any Debt buyer would register in their own name and would show such on an individuals credit file. ( in my case my so called debt was purchased by this company 4 years ago)

 

2) They would not provide different Assignment dates on letters of assignment.

 

3) They would not shy from any court hearings when challenged on issues 1 &2 .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi yes I did.

 

I have an email from TM legal confirming that lending stream have bought the debt back and Therefore is no longer nothing to do with them and that they would not be pursuing any further legal action.

 

I didn’t trust that they wouldn’t try and get the CCJ anyway so I submitted my defence and think I’ve covered all the main points.

 

They also seem to have missed that lending stream have only bought back one of the two loans making up the balance asset were pursuing.

 

I guess I should be expecting another court claim for the remaining balance when they have worked this out?

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey well done.

 

I doubt they'll want to waste more money if you total the expense todate

 

Never forget these are speculative claims in the 1st place.

Not expecting to be defended.

 

And they know you will now!!

 

As for the fmitl posts...best left off here

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not been struck out...if they are as true as their word they should have sent you a Notice of Discontinuance...so check with your court the same has been filed by the claimant.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey well done.

 

I doubt they'll want to waste more money if you total the expense todate

 

Never forget these are speculative claims in the 1st place.

Not expecting to be defended.

 

And they know you will now!!

 

As for the fmitl posts...best left off here

 

Dx

 

Is that quip Aimed at me FOTL ????

 

DX100uk I seriously dont think that you have the correct handle on this company.

 

They will and do continue claims with vexation, as you know well dx 100 so to say that the other poster should hear no more is a tad missleading

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...