Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please take note: I got 2 tickets for 32  miles in a 30 zone on different days.  The police said its their policy to ticket anything over 30!!   I had to pay £100 for one and do the course as well.  Even as a disabled driver there was no give on the tickets. Please stop saying that it has to be 35+ it really does not. West Midlands police in Nuneaton so definitely dont go 1 mile over in that area.  
    • New figures from the Insolvency Service show that early termination rates of IVAs have dropped 11% in the past year, while total IVAs have risen by almost 20,000 in the past two years. View the full article
    • Amigo Loans has posted an £87m loss for the nine months to December 31 2020, a 289% drop on the same period in 2019 View the full article
    • I've had a brief look over the thread and I see that there principle point is that he didn't take out insurance. Your answer to this is very simple – that it is absurd that you are required to pay to protect them against their own negligence or criminality of their employees or the people who are acting for them – in this case, Hermes.Your point here is that any requirement that a customer is required to pay extra to protect against the breach of contract is unfair within the meaning of the unfair terms provisions of the Consumer Rights Act. Please have a read of the unfair terms provisions of the Consumer Rights Act. In In particular, after you have read the sections within the act itself, get a schedule two and you will see examples of unfair terms. These are nonexhaustive which means that they are simply examples and lots of others can be added. An important point is that it forms a significant imbalance between your interests and their interests. They are using a standard form contract which is nonnegotiable. There is no competition because all the courier industry are doing this so there is no opportunity for you to go elsewhere and get a different type of deal. You will need to point out to the defendant – through the mediator – that included in the unfair terms provisions of the Consumer Rights Act is a provision that gives the court the power – in fact a duty – on its own initiative to examine the fairness or otherwise of any term. Point out to the defendant that if they want to go to court then you are happy about it. That you will then raise the question of unfairness to the judge and also you will invite the judge to look at the entirety of the contract and to pronounce on the fairness or otherwise of the contractual terms. Tell the defendant that you expect that the judge will decide unequivocally that a term of the contract which requires the customer to pay extra to protect themselves against the service providers breach of contract is grossly unfair – and in fact it is ridiculous. Basically they are saying "pay us to deliver your goods – and pay us extra if you don't want us to lose them."   Explain to the defendant that you are fully aware that this is a culture within the courier industry which has developed over 30 or 40 years or more but it's not acceptable and that when you get a judgement in your favour which confirms that the term is unfair, (as will surely happen) that you will then make sure that copies of the judgement find their way all over the Internet including social media that is concerned specifically with complaints against the courier industry and then the game will be up for the loss of them. One the mediator to tell the defendant that once you get this judgement, not only will people be claiming for ongoing lost items, but they will also be claiming retrospectively for legitimate claims which have been rejected on the basis of this unfair term. Make it clear to the mediator – that they should tell the defendant that you're not dealing with very much money here – and you are prepared to risk it all in order to go to court and to demonstrate this principle. If the mediator says that you should compromise then you should tell the mediator that if the defendant pays up in full – including costs and interest – that they will then be spared the problem of going to court and getting a judgement against them which will result in the loss of millions of pounds in the future. Tell the mediator that this is the benefit to the defendant and you are not prepared to hand them any further benefit if it means sacrificing a single penny of your claim. Tell the defendant to take it or leave it – you are happy either way.   It is very important that the defendant understands that you don't care either way whether you settle now mediation or goes to court. The defendant as a huge amount to lose if it goes to court. You have very little to lose  
    • Firstly I am disabled and have brain fog so can forget anything.  Today I went online to check when the MOT is due as just had to renew my car insurance and know it comes quickly after that. I was shocked to see my car was flagged as NOT TAXED.  I have had disability tax for years so dont even have to pay. After ringing DVLA I eventually found out papers had been sent to my old house which I left 3 years ago. With the stress of moving etc I never changed the car address but did change the address on my licence as that is correct.   Now I am worried I may have picked up a speeding ticket sometime in the 3 years and also maybe recently on a day trip to London (2 miles too fast coming out a tunnel). The old house is 150 miles away so cant pop in and no idea who lives there now. Thats how I got caught out with tax as they sent the paperwork there to renew. The lady renewed the tax easily on the computer for me which I was so grateful for and backdated it to 1 Feb. Can anyone tell me how I can find out if there are any tickets out there in my name that I know anything about please? I have had a really awful week with so many problems and this is now really making me feel sick so dont want to worry for months to catch up with me.   Thanks  
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Pdc claimform - part admitted, got judgement, wont except payment without addes fees - now issued a Section 146


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 851 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I am new to this forum so please forgive any mistakes.

 

I am having an awful experience with the above companies.

It all started with a service charge debt.. not very old..was due in December 2017 in advance for months Jan/Feb/March/April.

Hands up.. I can never afford to pay in advance but have always paid by the end quarter month.

 

In April 2018 received a letter from Property Debt Collection for the service charge (which obviously had no quibble with) but they had added excessive fees.

£250 for the Managing Agent to instruct them and £350.00 for their initial letter to me (which contained land registry entries which imo a bit premature at this stage).

 

I offered to pay the Managing agents the service charge and they flatly refused to deal with me saying I could now only deal with Property Debt Collection.

I tried to pay Property Debt Collection the service charge debt, plus £250 for the Managing agents fee (ok.. it was late so that's my fine), but only a reasonable fee for their letter of initially £10 which I increased to £50.00.

They flatly refused this saying they do not take part payments.

I offered them this on more than one occasion and also went back to the managing agents... no joy

 

To cut a very long story a bit shorter, it was passed to PDC Law (obviously related) who have taken me to the County Count Money Claims.

It has gone through the process and it seems that the Judge has entered that I pay them £833.20.

This is a lot more than I expected to pay as I sent the court a part admission and defence and acknowledgement of service etc within the timescales.

 

I also sent him all evidence of me trying to pay and the various parties refusing payment.

So today at the last final hour I gave in and as the Judge instructed rang PDC to pay them the money of £833.20 as on the Judgement for Claiment .

I was in total shock when they refused to take this payment from me.

 

They said they had issued a Section 146 Notice, on the 5th October, which I have not received (I run a business from home and every piece of post is logged in), they also said they had sent one to the Building Society.

I said sobeit but this is what the Judge has ordered.

 

I literally begged them to take the money as I said it was the last day for payment and the CCJ could then not be lifted in the usual way apparently.

It appeared they were blackmailing with this as they said it would be if I paid them a sum of £2308.15 !!

I have informed the Court about their refusal who said this was unusual and asked me to send this in to them in writing.

 

I so worried about this.

.. I have been dealing with this for my son and it appears that I have go him into a whole lot of trouble.

Can any help please??

Link to post
Share on other sites

re titled and moved to general legals.

 

you should never part admit a claim

and if you defend a case you must always attend the hearing.

 

you need to go thru his tenancy agreement with a fine toothed comb

if it says something about post judgemental fees/cost are applicable then I think you are stuffed.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

posts moved to your own thread

best to stick to this one rather than hi-jack

 

follow post 2 please.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good evening.

Thank you for your reply.

 

I was never invited to a hearing it just went in front of the judge, who ordered me to pay the said amount which I have tried to do.

 

I have never had an issue with paying the service charge just the unfair charges of PDC.

 

The original Managing Agent who instructed PDC have now been sacked for issues that could not be resolved.

 

I have no argument at all with the Claimant who have now instructed new Managing Agents whom I have a good relationship with.

 

If the Property Management Debt company had accepted my offer of payment in the beginning the Claimant would have their money in full, and surely this is the objective of a Debt Collector to collect the debt, and charge "a reasonable amount for sending out one letter".

 

I will look at the Lease, but surely somewhere there is a limit on what a company can charge for an initial letter, and also is it not their duty to take reasonable steps to recover the debt for their client by accepting payment from me?.

 

sorry I am having trouble finding my way around the site

Link to post
Share on other sites

even if you part admitted but also sent a defence you would have been sent a court date as far as I know?

 

anyway...

sadly if its in the tenancy agreement then sadly PDC can add their charges and there are numerous PDC threads in this forum that appear to suggest that they are lawful and they can.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thanks again.

 

 

I am still confused, I was not sent a court date at any time, it just went in front of the judge.

The Court is in Salford and I live far away from there.

 

So does PDC not have to accept the Courts Judgement but I do?

I filled in all the forms and sent them back to the court within the time period which they acknowledged.

I also defended each part of the Particulars of Claim with an exhibit of evidence of trying to pay and their refusal.

Of course I agree that PDC can add charges but surely they have to be reasonable?

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

then i'm puzzled as to why you never got an N180 etc to transfer this to your local court and for it to be heard by the judge.

was the claimform served to the correct address?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks again for your help.

The Claim form was sent to my son's address but we have his post redirected by Royal Mail to us.

After filling in the forms etc and returning them ( I have electronic receipts for them) it seemed to take along time.

 

In the meantime PDC were emailing me to say they have not received anything from the Court etc, I assured them that I had replied to the Court.

I rang the Court when I at last received the Judgement for Claimant (in default) and asked them how it had come to this without any explanation.

 

The judgement says I had not replied to the Claim form, but when I spoke with the Court they say I clearly had!!

They do seem a bit confused.

 

Today I received an email from them after calling them and writing in again saying "upon checking our case management system it appears the Claimant rejected your part admission offer and this was then referred to a Deputy District Judge for directions.

The DDJ them ordered that Judgment be entered as requested by the Claimant.

 

The judgement for claimant says I must pay the claimant the total of £833.20 by today.

PDC Law refused this payment from me today saying it had gone up to £2k plus.

I informed the Court of this and they were shocked that PDC had refused it.

 

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

why did they send stuff to your sons address?

I believe following letters have a do not redirect box on them ??

 

somethings are no right here on many fronts.

 

is this your debt or his?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You only pay £833.20 as per the judgment....as they have refused payment inform the court and instruct the court that the CCJ must not be registered because the Judgment Claimant is refusing to accept and trying to get you to pay more...which is not part of the judgment.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much on your clarification of this.

This is exactly what I thought.

 

I have informed the court yesterday, and although everyone there is very helpful things are very slow, and you never speak to the same person twice.

 

I will be calling them again this morning and I will post the outcome on here, so it may help others in my situation.

 

The debt is his and I am dealing with it for him.

My son does not live at the property so we have his post redirected to here through the Royal Mail re-direction service

Yes I agree with you it does not seem right.

Edited by dx100uk
merge/space
Link to post
Share on other sites

HI

 

This is still on going,

the court have reiterated that the judgement is correct and that they should accept the payment.

They wont and have now written to my building society.

 

Well they have not they have instructed an Indemnity Legal co to do it.

 

Now it looks like this Management Co instructed debt collectors, debt collectors passed on to their legal department now passed on to a company I have never even heard of!

 

Also I might add the original management company who instructed the debt collectors have been sacked by the Claimant.

 

I am so confused by this and cannot find any advice anywhere, I seem to be going around in circles.

 

Still do not understand why a judgement in default was sent out when I filed a part admission, acknowledgement of service and a defence all within the time frame.

 

Has any one on here had dealings with a First Tier Tribunal as I might go down that route.

In the meantime this is holding up the sale of my property!!

 

Any advice gratefully received

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

why is it holding up the sale of YOUR property when this is your SONs debt/judgement?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry I am not being very clear, its holding up the sale of my son's property.

 

Does any one know that if he lands up paying these people their excessive charges can he go through the process of First Tier Tribunal to ask them if they find the costs reasonable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the CCJ should not even be registered ….. how is it holding up a sale?

 

as post 10...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your replies. I do agree, it seems that something has gone wrong here.

Its holding up the sale of the property as the Claimant has issued a Section 146 on the Building Society (never received by us),

 

I have sent all explanations to the building society and supporting documentation that I tried to pay the Judgment but it was not accepted.

The Claimant (Landlord) to be honest know nothing of this as they are no longer represented by the Managing agent who instructed the Debt Collection Agency.

 

The original debt is less than £400, just a four months service charge.

The Notice with the Building Society is for £2300.00 so that's £1900 of costs all because I disputed the amount of their initial letter fee.

 

If the Court has handed my case wrong, will I have any comeback on this?

Also what chances do I have if I pay up just to get completion of the flat sale, of winning back some money from the Debt Collectors and their so called lawyers.

 

Ive heard something about a First Tier Tribunal?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I did ask the Court not to register the CCJ.... they said it was between me and the claimant and up to me to sort it out with them.

They would not accept payment of the judgment so I could not.

 

You would think that if a Court has ordered something they would back you up on carrying out their instructions or what is the point of the whole damn process!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

" Still do not understand why a judgement in default was sent out when I filed a part admission, acknowledgement of service and a defence all within the time frame. "

 

Any admittance automatically guarantees judgment and its registration ...you dont have a default judgment....always defend all the claim and then you can thrash out any disputes during the process...which you are afforded because you defended all.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No its not correct....a part admittance can not be a default judgment...a default judgment is when you fail to respond to the claim.

 

It should be a Notice of judgment for the partial admittance.

 

All explained din the CPR link I posted previously.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thank you I did read those notes and I have done previously as well because I found them independently but could not understand them.

 

Do I have a leg to stand on in complaining to the Court then.

I may have to just pay the whole sum requested by the Claimant though and hope to get some of it back through other means, or the sale may fall through.

 

They have me up against a wall really, and they knew this all along, but I am not one to give in without a fight even though its cost me in the end.

I do really appreciate your help, not been able to get advice anywhere on this.

 

Just to clarify...

when you say failed to respond to the claim...

do you mean when you received the papers from the court...

that's when I filed a defence part admission and acknowledgement of service all within the time limits ?

 

I did not fill in the Claimants initial form's as I was not disputing the debt only their costs.

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whether its a default judgment or not its irrelevant to your problem....the fact is you have a CCJ...which as stated is because you part admitted...always defend all then argue the ins and outs later.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the confusion happened when you were talking here as a third party and then as your son.

 

if you part admitted the CCJ on behalf of your son, there was never anything you could have done.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...