Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Different statements. One has “at 59 mph overtaking on the approach” and the other “it was overtaking on the approach and in ....... at 49 mph”. So not the same statement (same ethos, different sentence structure).   perhaps they chose that site for the officer because it is an accident hotspot, and they know people do dodgy overtakes (while speeding) there .....??  
    • Hi.   I've moved your thread to the Bailiffs forum. People should be along to advise later.   HB
    • So a little update;   Of the 6 letters I sent 3 were acknowledged. One accepting £1/month for now and two from the same creditor trading under different names asking for full I&E which I haven't done.   In a moment of madness I managed to depsoit 5k to a gambling site I didn't have due to paypal's crazy policy of allowing payments which are to be collected by direct debit after a couple of days to gambling sites! Mad they allow this but this will show as a negative paypal balance (in a different account to the original "debt"). The first paypal -£5k account has been closed and passed to a DCA now. I have ignored them.   My council has appeared to have stepped up their collection efforts for £2.5k in alleged housing benefit overpayment from 2015/16. I have acknowledged their letters over the past 3 years each time by email but they rarely respond to my pleas. I truly think if there was overpayment then it was for less than half the amount they claim. At the time I didn't think I was being overpaid because I wasn't really working but I had stopped claiming JSA/ESA (and told them as much) but earned a couple of hundred pounds a month from sporadic work.   Also what I thought was a dormant debt from 2016 to Halifax has been actually sold ( to caboot? I think. Hard to keep track of everyone)   I've been getting phone calls daily but ignoring them for the most part. I did request all communication in writing in my original letters.   I feel incapable of dealing with these creditors and whilst initially I was feeling that I would be happy to just ignore all the letters (arreas, defaults and the like) and phone calls for an indefinite amount of time and  hope to make it 6 years to statute barred-ness and accept or defend any CCJ attempts that did arrive. I figured that avoiding these creditors for 3 months so far is 5% of the way there to statute barred! But I figre for these fairly sizeable amounts they probably won't all let it go and I will get some CCJ docs (never had to deal with that) However now my mood and thinking has changed.    I am looking again at insolvency. I'm over the DRO limit now so its BR or nothing. I was wondering why you said to not consider this and it would be stupid @dx100uk? Although shirking my debts/responsibilities it does seem like an "easy" way out at the moment. It would be so nice to know that what's done is done and to be able to draw a line in the sand and start again in a year or so and not have to avoid creditors or worry about what's coming next...   It certainly would help the environment what with the amount of letters that are arriving already(!) considering the first payment I missed was october/november (excluding the old halifax and council debts). I am exordinately stressed about it now even though I thought I would be already . Any advice would be great if it was to get my head out of the sand and contact people/do the ignoring thing and seeing what happens/reasons  to do or not to do bankruptcy for these unsecured debts?   Thanks      
    • Hi everybody   Had a knock on my door and was confronted by either a Bailiff or enforcement agent (not sure about the specific job title). When I opened the door he stuck his foot in so I couldn't close the door. I was video taping him so I took a few steps backward (to get him in shot) and he just fully entered the property despite me saying that I was denying him entry and he refused to leave thereafter.   Turns out that he was there to collect a court issued fine. I think from a Magistrates Court. He worked for this outfit:   www.marstonholdings.co.uk   The reason for the fine was something to do with "driving without car insurance". Now I had a cheap car a few years ago but it broke down and would cost more to fix than it was actually worth. So I sold the car for scrap and cancelled the insurance. Turns out you have to inform the DVLA when you scrap a car and them that it is no longer on the road (I was unaware). So this was the circumstances of the visit.   My question is did he have the lawful right to enter the property? I always thought these people were like vampires i.e. they can only come in if you invite them in.   tia Bear  
    • oppss again then if its the same person.   knows the road well so should know what the speeds are and where they apply..      
  • Our picks

dementia-elderly

Taking house off 76yr old with Dementia, as Interest Only Mortgage has expired

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 485 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

My mum has had a mortgage for 45 years. It represents 17% of it's value.

They don't want to continue it, once it reached the end of it's term, even after agreeing to continue it in May of this year. We only get to know a repossession court date is due on 30th of this month, 10 days ago. Barclays know she was staying with me over summer and it was only a neighbour checking post, that alerted us.

(Barclays has made it very difficult for me to assist my mum on the issue)

 

They wanted a message from the doctor, which they got, now they changed their mind and want a more formal letter via the post. Before 'possibly' reconsidering.

 

Her rate was/is a minimum of 5% and went higher when rates increased recently. So they are earning well from her. Plus she paid off two loans they sold her, to pay off overdrafts, they kept letting her fill up! Until we asked them to stop. Both stink of miss selling.

 

The impact of this will worry her, cause her to fear leaving her home and disrupt her recuperation with us. An effort that took her from being skin and bones, close to death (even with carers/social workers visiting), to eating and being more healthy.

Edited by stu007
Edited

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry we cant carry photos removed


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DE and welcome to CAG

 

We need some more info here :-

 

1. Do you have Power of Attorney for YM or at least an "Authority to Act" that the bank recognises.

 

2. If there was a normal repayment mgge, did that not run it's full course.

 

3. Your mum is not likely to have had an interest only mortgage for 45 years so how did the I.O. mgge come about.

 

4. Did you not know the Int Only mgge was expiring.

 

5. Did YM make any arrangement to pay off what was owed on expiry of the Int Only term.

 

:-)


We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you slick132

 

1. No Power of Attorney but yes "Authority to Act" that the bank recognises

(though each new staff member has me waiting 30 minutes on the phone, whilst they confirm that they can talk to me!)

 

2. Not sure if there was a normal repayment mgge, that did that not run it's full course. 45 years ago.

 

3. Again not sure. But they sold her one that goes up and up, but never goes lower than 5%!

 

4. Took a year to be able to talk to them. Knew in May 2018 that Int Only mgge was expiring.

They agreed to extend it then changed their mind!

 

5. They want 79K, which my mum might not be able to get with Dementia (even with the next Banking con, Equity Release).

I would struggle to provide that in the next 18 days

 

Hopefully Barclays will see sense, if they have a heart/logic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is your mother's dementia such that she no longer has mental capacity? if so have you considered applying to the Court of Protection to be her Deputy? https://www.gov.uk/become-deputy

 

You say she stayed with you for the summer. Is she likely to continue living in the house on her own or will she be moving elsewhere, whether that's to live with you/another relative. or into sheltered accommodation, or to move in a care home? If so you would presumably sell the house? On your figures the house is worth more than £450,000 so (depending where in the country it is) sounds like there is scope for downsizing and moving into sheltered housing. If that is appropriate (I realise I know nothing about your mother's condition, I'm just speculating). If Barclays knew that was the plan they may be happy to wait for you to sell rather than them seeking repossession.

 

There's no other source of funds your mother could access for the £79k? Loan from a family member etc?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ethel Street, yes becoming a 'deputy' sounds like a good idea.

She has not seen her solicitor in a decade, so will need to get in touch with them (her one may have retired).

 

Her house is the only place she will settle, back with carers and me if needed, as the only remaining relative. So plan to do that once she is out of danger (puts on more weight). She might downsize one day, but would rather Barclays let her decide when to do it and continue her mortgage. As she is happy in her home. 79k isn't available within 18 days and I am likely to struggle to re-finance, as self employed.

 

Hopefully Barclays will see sense, if they have a heart/logic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Hopefully Barclays will see sense, if they have a heart/logic

 

 

I doubt they have a heart, although they've identified that their borrower is a vulnerable person and backed off for the moment. But they won't stay backed off for ever unless there is a plan how you are going to repay this. If you are looking at equity release as the only way to raise capital to pay off the mortgage do take professional advice before you commit. And I'd think you would have to be a court appointed Deputy to go down this route on your mother's behalf.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure whether they have given an inch yet.

Or whether,

agreeing to extend Mortgage in May,

agreeing on a Doctors email

and now demanding a Doctors Letter in the post,

is all a way of 'running down the clock'

 

As they may have no intention of stopping their attack!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

The thing is that I assume Barclays informed your Mum that there was still money owing. Given that it was an interest only mortgage there should have been a plan in place to repay the capital.

 

Is it possible you could take one of the options Ethel Street mentioned?

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not seen a letter, warning/giving a settlement figure and I cleared her place on every visit.

As she was being uninitiated with 'winning offers' & dodgy deals (being sent toy tractors / Eddie Stowbart Lorries!)

Neighbour says only the court letter came, since she has been away.

 

Her or I don't have any likely 79k fiance options & no time to sell, before 30th.

Plus any effort will mean her return to London & the end of her recuperation.

She is doing well, but needs longer, before the carers take over again, back in her home.

Edited by Mr.P
Rwmove link to mothr's photos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cláusula Suelo

 

Barclays selling 'fixed minimum rate mortgages', as mum appears to have, was found to be 'miss-selling' in Spain

 

theguardian.com/business/2016/apr/08/spanish-consumers-win-victory-over-mortgage-payments-barclays-santander-class-action

Banks including Barclays and Santander face a €5bn (£4bn) bill after a Spanish court ruled that millions of fixed minimum rate mortgages were null and void because of the “lack of transparency” in the way they were sold

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if a Spanish case will apply to your Mum, hopefully someone else will.

 

 

This link from the FCA says what lenders should be have been doing about communicating with interest only borrowers. Do you think they did this with your Mum?

 

 

Guidance consultation: Dealing fairly with interest-only mortgage ...

 

 

 

HB

Edited by Mr.P
Fix the link (hopefully)

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the Bankers must have less powerful friends in Spain. Thought it did take them 10 years to get justice.

One would imagine they have covered themselves... even when sending a court doc, to a house they know is empty.

Pretty sure they have done zero with mum and know they did nothing with me, other than agree to everything in May, then do the opposite!

But as with being miss sold my Endowment, I do not trust that they can be brought to task.

(They got away with sinking the world, already!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see that you're very angry with Barclays, but might it be better to focus on helping your Mum with her situation at the moment?

 

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks honeybee13.

 

Barclays will be her demise,

she will not survive the loss of her beloved home,

which she rarely left within the last 2 decades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Going back to the hearing, what paperwork has there been please?

 

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think an SAR to the bank may be an idea so you can find exactly HOW the bank came to lend money to YM by way of and Int Only mgge.

 

She needs to sign the SAR. See the link here - https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387306-Full-Subject-Access-Request-under-the-new-GDPR-2018-regime&p=4192184&viewfull=1#post4192184


We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

Found a couple of letters in the past. Not found any since they agreed to continue the mortgage in May this year. Not there as they know but not received any communications direct to me. Just the court date docs, were found in mums letter box, by a neighbour looking after the house, 30 days ago.

 

Barclays got the doctors email confirming Dementia which might stop the repossession, then changed their mind and demanded a letter.

 

It should be with them Monday, with days to go before the court date, for their Panel to reconsider.

 

Thank you.

It would be good to understand how they sold her a 'win win for them', Int Only mgge!

(but don't trust they would incriminate themselves, they are a bank, after-all!)

Or at least how many victims there are or whether there is a class action, as in Spain

(EU Courts upheld miss selling, so UK should follow Spain, surely)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The SAR may well disclose info that is useful in several ways.

 

Have you sent it off yet ?

 

:-)


We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No SAR sent, do appreciate the suggestion...

partly as don't trust the process/banks honesty

and not needed, if they just continue the mortgage for a few years

 

Doctors letter sent today (tracked signed)

Fingers crossed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's your prerogative, to not send the SAR. However, many cases here over years have been helped significantly by info disclosed by the bank in this way.

 

You may also now need to seek advice from the Court of Protection about getting formal recognition as YM's Representative. Remember that the bank will see the confirmation of Dementia not only as a reason to consider YM's condition but ALSO to make sure you or anyone else has proper authority to act and represent.

 

:-)


We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...