Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Savers are pouring money into cash Isas as they look to protect the interest on their nest eggs from tax. They put more than £11bn into cash Isas in April.View the full article
    • The stock ended the trading day at nearly $136, up 3.5%, making it more valuable than Microsoft.View the full article
    • More from the Second Sight guys in the Law Gazette. Post Office Inquiry: Second Sight accountant accuses lawyer of conspiring to pervert course of justice | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK Second Sight accountant found compelling evidence in two cases that evidence was withheld, public inquiry is told.  
    • Why have there not been arrests yet? Waiting for the end of an inquiry which seems designed to drag on forever is a feeble excuse "the Post Office “was constantly sabotaging our efforts” to seek the truth and used claims of legal professional privilege – a type of confidentiality which covers legal documents – “to justify withholding documents from us”. "Aujard had said the state-owned body “would not hesitate to take legal action against me” under a “draconian” non-disclosure agreement (NDA)" "Henderson became concerned after reviewing the case file of Jo Hamilton, .. Henderson said the Post Office’s decision to charge Hamilton did not seem to be supported by its own internal security report, and there was evidence that “potentially exculpatory material” had not been disclosed to her at trial or subsequently. “I regarded this as either professional misconduct or, potentially, criminal conduct,” he said."   Horizon IT scandal investigator tells inquiry Post Office was ‘sabotaging our efforts’ | Post Office Horizon scandal | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Ian Henderson, looking into possible miscarriages of justice, said he came to believe he was dealing with ‘a cover-up’  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Euro Car Parks - Sainsbury's - Golders Green (ANPR) - 614 Finchley Road, Golders Green, London, NW11 7RX

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1810 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

I got a NTK through the post today. Attached is the NTK and sat view of the layout. The entrance ANPR camera is before any car park signs, It does not say whether the driver was parked in the actual car park or on the forecourt.


Street view shows the signs, I am unable to get a picture of the sign without a drive into London to get there. https://goo.gl/maps/yh1ehnDVUsR2


For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture]


please answer the following questions.


1 Date of the infringement 27/09/2018


2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 08/10/2018


3 Date received 10/10/2018


4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?] Yes


5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Number plate only


6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up your appeal]No


7 Who is the parking company? Euro Car Parks


8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Sainsbury's - Golders Green

Golders Green ANPR.jpg

jpg2pdf (3).pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

You say the invoice arrived today which Is the 11th October so the letter did not arrive within the correct time.


You partly obscured the arrival times and we do not yet know the actual length of time allowed.

Were you well over the a!lowed time or Just a matter of minutes?


My first instinct would be to call Sainsbury's And explain why you overstayed (assuming You did)tell them how much you spent with them And the reason for the time spent and ask That as you are a regular and good customer Could they kindly cancel the ticket for you Especially as you received the ticket out of time Thus breaching the Data Protection Act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies, I opened the letter today, but it came yesterday on 10th.


Max time on the signage is 60 minutes (No return within 2 hours).


I obscured the exact times as I wasn't sure how anonymous to make it. Total time was 3 hours 20 minutes.


Driver shopped for lunch in Sainsbury's but also visited the local area. They don't think they have the receipt but apparently may still be in my car.


Just to add, there are garages after the ANPR which appear to be public. I am unsure where the driver actually parked, but if they had parked in that area, then surely this is invalid?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry not sure I understand what you're asking.

I'm guessing Euro Car Parks owns the signs.

They say "Working in partnership with Sainsbury's".



I have emailed Sainsbury's to find out who owns the land infront of the garages, as the driver may have parked here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you get down there and photograph the entrance from the public highway and then the sigange as you see it as you go in plus a close up of the sign and any that are different so they can be read easily. say approximately how big they are, how far off the ground and how bif the font size is.



Now, if there is a good reason your car was there for a long time you should get on to Sainsburys HQ and moan at them to cancel it. Drinking gallons of coffee in their cafeteria would suffice but if you just parked there to go on a jolly in central London i wouldnt even start that conversation unless you cna prove you did some shopping atthere at the time.



So, show us the siganeg and we can help you from there. Plenty of hurdles for them to jump yet before their charge is lawful.



BTW a notice must be issued within 12 days of the day AFTER the event and then they have 2 days to serve siad notice so they are just in time

Edited by honeybee13
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll get some pictures when I can get there, it's only 16 miles away but is in London so would take me more than an hour.

The signage is the same as what is on streetview if that helps?

The images were taken recently.


The public highway is a one way system where you can't avoid going through their ANPR, and it isn't obvious that it is a car park, no signs until after ANPR.


There is what I believe to be public land after the ANPR in 2 places and cars often park there instead.

I have emailed Sainsburys HO to confirm who the land belongs to.


The driver did some shopping in Sainsburys at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now there are a couple of Sauinsburys where this is a known problem, the one in Beddington, Croydon is a classic with a bus route going through the car park and a public access road to other buildings at one side that also gets snapped. there is another one where there is access to soem houses and agian PE send out demands and moan that they werent told you had visitors and it isnt fair that they have to cancel a ticket just because you have friends.



thre are 2 Sainsburys in that area so which one is the subject? They ahvent specified so get pictures of the other one as well so you can use them as a big stick if it goes that far.

Now for ANPR capture they MUST provide photographic evidence in the NTK and I cant see anything on yours that fulfils this requirement. It is not just about number plates it is evidence of the vehicle and thei toy cameras are around 5% wrong so they need to show more than a digitally altered picture of a small part fo a vehicle. Again, that is somehting to clobber them with but they wont be willing to accept this argument as they would have to do some work then and probably lose money.

So, if you can nice pictures of the entrance from the public highway, evidence the camera is spying on the wrong place and pictures of the other sainsburys just down the road to cause confusion and show they have breached the POFA in their lazy NTK.



In the meanwhile get on to Sainsburys Head ffice and tell them abotu this shoddy outfit and the capturing of images of vehicles on the public highway and using it to besmirch sainsburys good name etc and tell them that you expect them to tell the parking cowboys to cancel or you will not only defeat the claim form the parking co but drag Sainsburys name through the mud in socail media, local paper etc if they dont want to help

Link to post
Share on other sites

They did specify which Salisbury's in the letter. Further down they gave the full address.


It's going to be difficult getting there to take pictures of the signs, it's around a 3 hour round trip, or 2 hours at night. How important is it to get those pictures?

Link to post
Share on other sites

aqnd how have you contacted sainsburys? if by email it means you ahvent read a lot of the threads that say dont use email because all that happens is they forward the email to the parking co who then just use it to harass you. Phoning head office would have been the first step and then a stiff letter to the corporate team at the top rather than any customer service group.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what email addy did you sned it to, we always say look up the boss's email address at ceoemail and use that. It will get through to a hO team and they have the clout to order ECP to stop being silly.

If you have emailed a customerservices addy you ahve just given away more information to the parking co.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep customer service. But I didn't give details yet. I wanted to see what they say before giving any details or dates. Passing any details will be against GDPR anyway since I didn't ask them to get ECP to cancel, just asking if they would be willing to. I've sent a follow up email demanding that my details are not passed to ECP unless I agree so.


I'll email Mike Coupe, is there anything in particular I should say? Should it be an email on mitigating circumstances or complain about the parking company themselves and that the driver parked on public land just after the ANPR camera?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the look up the ceo email and start again. Explain the parking co's siganeg is so crap it doeans t form a contract, cameras sited in the wrong place and that they as the peope who brought in a bunch of crooks to rob their customers blind are the peopel who should sort t out before it all becomes public knowledge on facebook, twitter etc. I bet the area has its own facebook accout so start finding palces you can post up about this if you dont get a suitable response. yopu might want to adjust the language I have used but keep the sentiment, they are not honest

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ericsbrother, I'll get an email written up today.


Do you think it would be worth me asking who owns the garages next to the car park as the driver may have parked here and I can use this as a defence?


If a car were to reverse in front of the last garage, it would have been caught on ANPR.


Does ANPR record video? as this may show this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an over stay from Euro Car Parks from staying too long at a Sainbury's. I emailed their customer service (waste of time), but made it clear I didn't want any of my details passed on to ECP unless it is to instruct ECP to cancel the notice. This way they can't pass on details which would show you as the driver.


I was then contacted by someone from Head Office who want to know more about my complaint. (Not sure if I'm allowed to post email addresses here, but I can PM?)


I looked at the Bolton Store on Street view and I can see the entrance ANPR, but I cannot see the exit, since the car park slowly turns into another car park managed by another company and there are many ways to exit the ECP operated carpark.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've also read the BPA Code of Practice, and realised that where they put the sign for the car park entrance is beyond the ANPR. the ANPR doesn't even cover if cars are entering the actual car park or not. There is no way that they can prove if any cars captured on ANPR even entered the car park. There is a a separate sign just before the ANPR that only covers parking in the service area.


I couldn't find this mentioned in the CoP, but is it worth complaining to the BPA about anyway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You get the ticket sorted with Sainsburys befoe you start anything else.




Also consider who is trhe BPA paymaster, it is again sainsburys who should receive the complaint first so once your ticket is cancelled you can go on the attack.




By all means tell them when you give them more details that their pet aprking co is probably ticketing peopel who have not even visited their store and they are going to get the grief over it as some of the more rampant parking defenders wil try and get ticketed on purpose just to create a breach of the DPA and they will go after the store as they have more to lose than a mickey mouse parking outfit

Edited by honeybee13
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...