Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, please fill in the sticky that HB posted - the more ammo we have against them, the better.   To answer your questions.   1.  You're right.  However the PPCs have complete contempt for the law and will pursue you regardless, hoping you will finally give in, or they'll get a default judgement, etc.   2.  You need to reply to the LBC and make it quite clear to the charlatans that you will be big trouble if they do do court.  We call this the "snotty letter" strategy.  Do a search on the forum for "snotty letter" and you'll see loads of examples.    3.  Again, you're right.   4.  The best way is to deal with the matter in two stages.  Firstly, concentrate on seeing off the ticket.  Then later, if you want revenge, sue them for breach of GDPR.
    • Thanks dx. I will ignore until I hear anything further from them.  
    • So, so far we have -   1.  Appalling signage with the £60/£100-ish charge in particular being illegible.  No PP either.   2.  Double dipping, you actually obeyed what was on their silly signs.   3.  No locus standi.  A blank unsigned template is not a letter, let alone a contract.   4.  Double recovery.  As well as £50 legal costs they have invented £60 Unicorn Food Tax.   WS in post 99 is useful for (1), (3) & (4)  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/417771-cel-pcn-claimform-tenerife-buildings-station-road-south-gosforth-newcastle-ne3-1qd-claim-discontinued/page/4/#comments   WS in post 87 is useful for (1), (3) & (4)  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421029-opcdcb-legal-anpr-pcn-paoloc-now-claimform-overstay-st-johns-retail-park-wolves-claim-discontinued/page/4/#comments   WS in post 122 is again useful for (1), (3) & 4  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/410445-ukcpmgladstones-windscreen-pcn-claimform-vista-centre-salisbury-rd-hounslow-tw4-6jq-claim-dismissed/page/5/#comments   WS in post 58 with comments in post 59 useful for (3) and (4)  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422971-excel-anpr-windscreen-pcn-claimform-brewery-st-car-park-chesterfield-on-0207-2018-claim-dismissed/page/3/#comments   I haven't got time to look at the lot, but there are probably useful WSs in the following (scroll down the pages till you come to the WS, which will always be an attachment)   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/419899-ukcpmgladstones-spycar-pcn-claimform-no-stopping-trinity-park-birm-airport-claim-dismissed/   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/414313-cpmbw-windscreen-pcns-bw-pap-loc-now-claimform-residential-car-park-the-citrus-building-maderia-road-bournemouth-claim-dismissed-with-costs/   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421756-vcs-pcn-claimform-broomfield-developements-broomspring-close-s37xa-claim-dismissed/   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/429200-excel-pcn-claimform-broomhill-roof-car-park-in-sheffield-claim-dismissed/   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/419312-vcs-pcn-claimform-no-stopping-in-restricted-zone-bristol-airport-claim-dismissed/    
    • I don't understand why Leave.eu would want to leave and then stay in Europe anyway. I'm sure you don't either, TJ.    
    • Because we've seen the PPCs' antics a thousand times.  They always refuse appeals.  On every occasion they send out the same standard "threatening" letters.  In each case they then involve a third party to pretend the matter has somehow got more serious and the sum owed has increased.  It's got nothing to do with "sticking by their guns", it's what they always do, whether their case is good or if it's pants.   What do you think an unbiased judge would decide when you prove there was no sign at the entrance, just one in the car park at the height of the stratosphere, that the cafè owners had to stick up their own signs to protect their customers, that ages after your visit PCMUK finally installed decent signage, etc., etc? 
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

TV license summons - not factual and no caution


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 834 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have been summonsed by the TV license people.

TV licensing cancelled my DD when it bounced.

I hadn't noticed as I'm always broke so there's not much point checking bank app.

Being a quarterly bill as well made me forget about it.

 

They wrote to me and I phoned them and they said they would send me out a card to use at PayPoint to pay for a license.

I never received this card.

Next thing I get this guy at the door being all friendly like and asking about licence and TV usage.

 

I told him I play prerecorded stuff for the kids (which is true as I don't watch TV hardly at all).

He noticed I had a sky dish.

 

He told me about the weekly payment plan scheme and said he would sign me up for it and pulled out a temporary card and leaflet.

He placed this over his clipboard as he gave me the form to sign.

He said I would not have any further problems.

 

Once i was inside I looked at the form I signed and at the top it had a caution.

This was never mentioned and I wasn't aware of it.

He stated on the form that the interview commenced at 5.33pm and ended at 5.35pm

- yet it took a lot longer than that explaining the payment system to me and asking me other questions.

He has literally lied as well by just making up answers

- nothing major but nevertheless...

 

I used the simple payment plan to make payments but whenever i log into it it says I am up to date with payments and gives me next payment date.

Looking back I may have overlooked one or two but it's never flagged that up so I keep thinking I'm doing ok with it.

 

Then I get the intended prosecution in the post.

TV licensing want £120 plus a victim charge plus a fine when it goes to a magistrate.

 

I will have to plead guilty but surely he had a duty to read the caution to me

- as I would have just closed the door or something??

 

Any quick advice please. thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

he is commission based

gets nothing if he doesn't make you admit.

 

sadly you had no legal right at all to entertain him.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you signed it you've admitted guilt and they'll send it to court unless you can pay the amount owed.

 

Having a sky dish means nothing. You could have 10 outside. It doesn't mean any of them are hooked up to a box.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Didn't know what I was signing though - I thought (was given the impression) it was a formality. I've been doing some reading and it seems these people are good at getting people to sign and not giving cautions etc. The caution would set off anyone's alarm bells which is probably why many of them don't actually issue it. Nasty pieces of work.

 

I will plead guilty, but will follow up my complaint against the person that mislead me.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thry give that impression because theyre commission based. Soon as you sign it, they get paid.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want your day in court then say the "******* (dont) covered up the declaration for you to sign as you felt intimidated by there presence and it was only after you had your copy and read it after you calmed down you read it.

It might work, it might no. Speak to duty solicitor at the court

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...