Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • best to create a topic of your own please this one is for advising SSwales. click create in the top red banner   dx  
    • There is a caveat. Within the first 6 months the assumption of a fault at time of selling means that it is for the seller to disprove.   This can be through showing, possibly as in the case of engine 'blowing up' in this thread, that due attention by the purchaser has been  paid to such things as the oil and water levels, all other adjustments have been maintained, any due servicing has been carried out, etc.   We have not been given details of make, model,  age, mileage on purchase, miles covered by OP and servicing history. It is for these reasons that I find the above post questionable.   There is actually no doubt that if you buy a vehicle and the engine blows up within three months then it is not of satisfactory quality. Because it has happened within three months and the six-month rule applies and that means that she is entitled to have a repair and if the repair fails then a refund or a replacement at her option
    • Thank you, I will have a think about where we go from here & if I do decide to progress with a claim with an initial letter, if I can pass it through you to check, I would be very grateful.  Thank you so much again for your assistance to date
    • Yes she told me she had a large company install cctv they didn’t install what they said and she took them to court and won , she then had another person fit them and there was a problem with her tv signal threatened him so he just took them out and gave her her money back . I didn’t know this until after I had installed them and she said the tv was playing up last time she had them fitted 🤦🏼‍♂️ ... this is why I’m so sure it’s nothing to do with what I installed she was happy I told her the problem was with her old analogue aerial and I would go in the loft and switch it to the digital one she declined , told her I would install the cctv on her laptop , mobile phone or connect to tv via router she declined all soloutions . There was no problem with the cctv working through her tv no break lines or pixels , just her tv signal  ive been back and forth trying to sort it out 
    • Quick question for my education (and I hope the OP's).   When sending copies of notices and evidence etc to a defendant, should it be sent recorded delivery or is first class with proof of postage sufficient (or even better)?   Can't recorded delivery be refused by the recipient?  And if it is refused, can a defendant legitimately argue that it was never received?   Sorry - don't want to drag this thread off topic but it seems sort of relevant.
  • Our picks

    • My personal experiences of Future Comms 
       
      Don't touch them owe me £500 since January 2019 make excuse after excuse. Seem they always have software problems sending money out. Keep saying they will call back or email nothing been chasing it now for 6 mths the phone staff always have the same banter we will chase it up and get back to you then nothing!
      • 0 replies
    • Future Comms is a Big Con. How to get out of it. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/417058-future-comms-is-a-big-con-how-to-get-out-of-it/
        • Like
      • 4 replies
    • Future Comms issues. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416504-future-comms-issues/
      • 5 replies
    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
JonL12345

How to choose a trademark lawyer

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 247 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I have never hired a lawyer before, except when buying a house, so I have no idea where to start.

 

Recently, I received an opposition to a trademark application, so it looks like I need to get some legal advice. So I have a few questions!

 

1. Is it best to get a local lawyer, or are most meetings done by phone or Skype?

 

2. How do I evaluate if the lawyer is any good?

 

3. When you are making initial enquiries, do they charge you when you speak with them? Or do you tend to speak with their assistants on initial enquiry?

 

4. Should I speak to a couple of different lawyers first?

 

5. Do most lawyers charge by the minute?

 

Anything else I should be aware of?

 

Thanks,

 

Jon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

 

I'm sorry you haven't had any replies yet, I've flagged your thread for the site team to see if someone can help,

 

 

Are there lawyers involved on the other side?

 

 

HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

who has objected to your application and on what grounds? If your trademark is your name then the opposing side will lose but will make it expensive for you. Is the opposer in the same commercial activity as you? If not then easier to win so for example if your name is Clark and you are selling shoes you can understand why someone would objsct but that wouldnt be the end of it as long as you are careful on what you are trademarking as they use a particular script etc.

 

 

As for specialist lawyers, ask the Solicitors Regulaion Authority for a list of relevant names and then do a bit of searching on a few that take your fancy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Without giving out the name of the opposer, let us say it was Apple. Assume I have a brand called AppleSponge. They would claim that I am leaching off of their good name. I think it is opposing on relative grounds. They haven't given any grounds. It is a threat of opposition, showing intent to oppose after the 1 month recommended warning period.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

then I presume that you go ahead with your application as they have failed to put up the promised opposition. If the "Apple" co are in the same business sector as you then you may find you dont get the trademark regardless of any opposition or lack of it.

Bass' red triangle was the world's first trademark but at the time some 100 other companies used it, mostly to rip off the Bass good name.

again, apple cant realistically object to you using the name of another fruit as blackberry, apricot etc all exist ( and some before apple did)

 

 

The only nighmare may prove to be getting the wording exactly right of you go it alone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the replies. I have withdrawn my trademark application now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...