Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowells Claim Form - old Talk Talk debt and an Eon Debt *** Claim Discontinued***


sillygirl1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1409 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all, after a very long time (over 4 years) I am being chased by Lowells over an alleged Eon bill - long disputed even before the alleged 2014 default date.

 

This is from when they started 'backbilling' me when I moved into a flat previously occupied by people who had a key meter fitted.

I took over the tenancy and they hassled me over alleged 'back amounts due' which had nothing to do with me.

The amount of the bill is 1110 + (according to Lowell it is NOT statute barred as the default was in 2014 - default actually would have been 2012/2013).

 

I've had no other correspondence or statement from either Eon or anyone else in the last 4 years.

 

Is my best move to CCA them - and where is the latest template letter?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Welcome back SG - Its been a while :)

A CCA wont apply here - Its not an agreement under the CCA 1974 - Have they threatened to do court yet?

They started picking up these Util debts recently. Havent seen one go legal yet... But id ignore it for now.

 

Do you have proof of when you moved in? If so you are not liable for this and you would beable to defend these easy in court :)

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Id let them keep sending their threatograms... Just note that since you were last here - The process for raising claim forms has changed.

If you get a letter of claim - You will have 30 days before the claimant will issue a claim form

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its quite safe to ignore most DCA's on utils bills

they think it gives them magical powers it doesn't

 

lowells have recently bought a whole load of these EON debts and a few threads have popped up.

 

they've not done court nor have I seen any DCA do court on a utils bill.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Ive received a claim. form from Lowells for an old Talk Talk debt and an Eon Debt on the same claim and need urgent help in filling it our.

 

I have also got a complaint in with the FCA so will inform them tomortow if Lowlifes idiocy.

 

Out of touch wirh what to do...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please complete the following:

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

popped in a few old posts for the eon debt above too for history 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did that dxq00uk, can you unmerge this tjread as that was a different account in 2014, NOTHING to do with this one.

 

Do I need to send them anything?

 

Account 1 s old mobile contract

Account 2 is old electricity account

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry DX100UK, it IS the same claim soI now have further grounda.

 

I have poor particulars I cam PM over if needed, took a photo of them before I left today.

 

Need to stress kong running complaint with Ombudsman, getting onto them this morning.

 

Want to stress employmemt ending in October and several health conditions under investigation.

 

Also need to point out Lowells contacted by phond and post many tumes stressimg eon debt ling in dispute.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you wish but it would really help if you could copy the q's from that link to a post here and answer each q at the end before submitting.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio Limited

 

Date of issue –14 August

 

Date to acknowledge - 1st September

 

date to submit defence  - 13 September

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim - 

 

1) The Claim comprises the following Agreements the Defendant entered into:

 

a.  Talk Talk Telecom Group plc with ref xxxxx current balance £120.87

b.  E.on Energy Solutions Ltd with ref of xxxx and current balance of £1141.65

 

The Agreements were terminated as payments were not maintained and subsequently assigned to the Claimant.

 

And the Claimant claims:

 

a) total of thensaid sums being £1262.52

b) interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue being £101.00

c) Costs

 

What is the total value of the claim?  1513.52

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC ( Pre Action Protocol) ? A few weeks ago, replied by phone and post denying everything

 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? In 2015, this relates to an old address.  last payment on electric account Nov 13

 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? Yes


Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?

 

a) TV/Broadband terminated when they had two well publicised data breaches

b) old utility bill

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? Before

 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Both by phone

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/ Equifax /Etc...) ?NO, hasn’t been there in ages

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?On Lowells own paper a while ago

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Cant remember

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? NO

 

Why did you cease payments? Bill in dispute as greatly overcharged and meter faulty, daily readings very high

 

What was the date of your last payment?

 

TV/Broadband unknown

Eon said 13 November 2013 so nigh on statute barred, defaulted long before this payment....

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Yes to both accounts

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on many occasions 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

.

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked.
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.
.
 

get a CPR 31:14 running to the sols [or the claimant if none are listed]

 

 

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/
.
.
type your name ONLY

no need to sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]
 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

TV/Broadband terminated when they had two well publicised data breaches

expand please 

what was the dispute

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 26/08/2019 at 12:14, dx100uk said:

TV/Broadband terminated when they had two well publicised data breaches

expand please 

what was the dispute

Dispute with Talk Talk was their data breaches.  had to stop using old email and house phone due to spam calls.

 

Eon was long running dispute over billing, first bill included amounts Inwas not liable for (they thought Inowned the property when I only rented it and tried back billing me).  The meter was also faulty and they had me domdaily readings which proved that, meter was changed but they didn’t honour their agreement to remove  over billing.  Part payment was made in Nov 2013 but they still sent incorrect bills.  I moved from there in May 2015 with billing unresolved.  Final reading was given and was way way lower than theirs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so should be a walk in the park on both then.

 

std no paperwork/holding defence in most claimform threads in this forum

with I expect a line for each debt outlining both were in serious dispute with their respected original providers because of xxxx

 

finer detail is for later if lowells don't drop the case as they appear to be doing on most of these non cca claims recently once robustly defended from the off set

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

near SB is irrelevant.

 

there are a couple of util bill claimfrom threads just below yours.

mixing any of the talk-talk / mobile / broadband claimform defence bit too.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

post it here 1st.

don't file yet

not due till 13th!!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Draft defence

 

1,  The claimants  are claiming two different accounts with two different companies,.

 

2.  Repeated requests to the claimants for information regarding these accounts have been ignored.

 

3.  The Talk Talk account for 120 is for charges after the account was closed due to well publicised data breaches, a further data breach occurred when they passed the unsubstantiated claim to the claimants.

 

4.  The Eon debt has been long running since the inception of that account in 2012.  In November 2013 a partial payment was made to try and resolve the issue but Eon failed to uphold their agreement and contract with me,  Therefore this account has been in dispute for a considerable time.

 

5.  The claimants sent a series of letters about these two alleged debts offering discounts of up to 70%, each time I telephoned and asked for  further information they failed to provide it.  

 

6.  By putting two unrelated debts together the claimants have provided the courts with misleading information and therefore the claim should be  struck out.

 

7.  The defendant has continually informed the claimants of the circumstances around these disputed debts and has been denied any evidence the claimants have a right to legal action.

 

8.  The defendant has no legal training and can not afford legal fees, therefore the claimants claim for costs and interest should be denied.

 

9.  This is a statement of truth by .....

 

I don’t

Edited by sillygirl1
Link to post
Share on other sites

So you dont intend submitting a CPR compliant defence or adapting our standard defence ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...