Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you all   JK, I agree; if they were to accept my full claim today, then the interest would be around 8-9 pounds. If I were them, I would have offered to pay the interest and said no to the 12 pounds for the letters. These have not been mentioned, which is my mistake.   As you pointed out, if the judge were to award at 4% and I did not get the letters, I would get less.   Bank, thank you. I do hear what you are saying. If I am to continue with this, then I will need to pay an additional trial fee of £59. If I win everything, then great, but if I win less the claim and court fee, then I lose out. I am not sure what the judge will think about the interest. I think we have to remember that I won the item and, therefore, did not pay a penny for it. Yes, I have had to purchase an additional one, but maybe the judge will hold this against me. I am content that this is a win. I have not signed any non-disclosure clauses, and they do not ask for this either in their offer. 
    • Are you saying that both businesses were closed? Yet you stayed there for over two hours. . If both were closed than to charge £100 is a penalty since Horizon had no legitimate interest in keeping spaces clear for the company. sake as there were no customers..
    • Well you would think that would be the case. Sadly i doubt there is one honest broker within the BPA or IPC and most of their members. they are there to take as much money as they can from motorists regardless of PoFA.   Take the Consideration  period for example. This is a minimum of 5 minutes to allow motorists to find a parking space, read the T&Cs giving them enough time to leave the car park without having to pay if they decide not stay. Simple. Well it would be simple if it were any other company than BPA [or IPC who have now fallen into line with BPA's "reasoning"].  You see if you decide to stay then despite the fact that during the Consideration period when you still weren't classed as parking , once you accept the terms [with all the underhand little tricks designed to trip you up] that five minutes is now included in your parking time. [No not the parking period because the poor dears who ANPR cameras are apparently unable to work out what the exact parking period is since their ever so infallible cameras [yeah right] are incapable of tracking cars once they are in a car park]. After 12 years they still haven't worked out a way of doing it. Some of them fudge and the majority [with a wink fro their ATA [Accredited Trade Association though it should be Discredited Trade Association] just ignore the parking period all together. This is what BPA claim is the Consideration period Entrance grace period: This is for when motorists enter a car park, read the signs and/or attempt to make payment then leave. In these instances, motorists must be offered a reasonable amount of time before an operator takes enforcement action, but we do not define this time, due to the variance in size and layout of car parks. An entrance grace period for a small, permit-only car park could be below 5 minutes, whereas for a large multi-story this could be 15. But  heaven forbid that anyone should leave 6 or 7 minutes after entering  their member's car parks. . They are dutybound to receive a PCN. This is regardless of how busy the car park would be [Christmas eve for example ] .Our minimum is their maximum. Moving on to Grace periods. Again BPA gobble degook. Exit grace period: This must be a minimum of 10 minutes and this is when a motorist intends to stay – for example, if you paid for an hour but spent a total of 1 hour 10 minutes on-site, you will not receive a PCN. It is important to note that the grace period is not a free period of parking however and should not be advertised as such. If that ten minutes in not free parking what is it. their members all think they can send out PCNs for anything after 1 minute after the exact time never mind ten minutes. Our snotty letters have stood the test of time. Do not try to reinvent the wheel -especially with DCBL . They don't even know what a non compliant PCN is for goodness sake! You already know more about PoFA then they do. However if you include that they will find a way to disabuse the Judge of your logic and the law. So don't give them the chance.  I am sure you have the Parking Prankster going on about the rogues misusing the rules on planning permission by lying and stating that they had "retrospective permission". There is no such thing in English law yet Judges were swallowing it until one Judge pulled up Parking Eye about one of their Witness Statements alluding to "rp" by claiming it was "tantamount to perjury".  It wasn't tantamount,it was plain and simple perjury. Parking Prankster: The great private car park planning approval scam PARKING-PRANKSTER.BLOGSPOT.COM Guest blog from shuteyepark, from the Consumer Action group forums In December 2013 my daughter received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) fro... Hope it wasn't too long winded Nicky Boy.🙂
    • and more immediate issues WT* is the UK doing. Ukraine needs these funds and weapons NOW Lets sincerely hope this isnt another Tory VIPal skimming issue.   MoD accused of ‘go-slow’ with half of £900m Ukraine fund unused | Defence policy | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Delays mean just £404m of the money donated by nine countries has been committed or spent  
    • If everyone who wanted or needed a permit could get one easily how would PCM make any money?    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Very, Lowell ..... ccj?


Nicnac13
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2034 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had an account with Very which was

 

Started 16/10/02

Defaulted 26/08/11

Default Balance £2130

Last payment 02/07/12

 

The last payment was made through a DMC to Lowell Portfolio Ltd.

 

I received varous letters from Lowells and at some point remember receiving letters from bryan carter solicitors. I ignored them!

 

Then i get a letter from Lowells saying that the account has been returned from the solicitors to them and that as i have not made any payments on my ccj they would be taking action. Apparently BC solicitors took me to court.

 

I never received any papers from the court.

My address never changed either.

 

I checked online and found that i would have received a big package of blue(?) court papers, did not receive them.

Because of this on 31 July 2016 I went online to RTL to check the Register of Judgments

- There was nothing registered for me, at my address.

 

In Nov 2017 my Experian credit report showed the very account gone and no ccjs were on there.

 

Today i have received a letter from Lowell Solicitors stating, second notice of county court judgment arrears -£1900.00.

 

The reference number they give refers to the Very account.

Are they pulling a fast one, trying to get me to contact them.

 

This account is now statute barred I believe?

very lowell.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would be handy to find out what date this alleged CCJ was granted......but from the looks of it ..it has now passed the 6 years to enforce it without the courts permission.

 

They refer to a claim number on their letter...give MCOL Northampton a ring and try to get some information...date issued...judgment granted...copy of their particulars...which they will email to you if you ask.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Thread moved to Financial Legal Issues Forum.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ring Northampton and get the dates.....then you can rest assured that they would have to go back to court to get permission to execute and enforcement.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right i'm confused now.

 

Finally was able to get to speak to someone in Northampton.

The claim number was correct, but they had the wrong house number.

So it would seem all the court forms would have been sent to the wrong address.

 

She said the claim was issued 5 June 2015, and judgement granted 7 July 2015.

Still waitng for email confirmation of this.

 

Don't understand how they got the address wrong, been here over 20 years and the Lowell letters all got the address right.

 

Where do i stand now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so CCj is within 6yrs so they can enforce.

 

you need to findout who made the address mistake...await copy of the claimform and CCJ via email pdf..you did ask for that?

 

that gives you a reason to set aside..

..and the fact that the debt was statute barred [you hadn't paid anything for a clear 6yrs sometime] gives you a defence for the actual Claim/debt.

 

should be a walk in the park

 

nothing unusual for carter here, he played all kinds of tricks deliberate or otherwise to ensure backdoor CCJ's ...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what i asked for exactly, think i asked for a copy of all the info she had just told me, and all that was connected with the judgment. Still waiting for the email, she said it would be a couple of minutes, been 40 odd mins now.

If i have received no email by the morning should i ring them again, and this time request copies of the claimform and the ccj, by email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well thats why its not showing on your CRAs/Registry Trust...from the claimants perspective...this it what they should have done......

 

 

Requesting a Default Judgment

 

At this stage, you can update the defendant’s address if it has changed since the issue of the claim; however please note that the defendant’s name cannot be altered. If the defendant’s

name is incorrect or you are aware that the defendant’s address was incorrect when the claim was issued do not continue requesting judgment – you will need to apply to amend and reserve

the claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reserve or reverse??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reserve Judgment...until all corrections are made.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The email has arrived, I was told on the phone that actual copies of things would be charged for, but he would send me all the details he could that were free. Here comes my headache again!

 

 

 

Claim No:

Amount Claimed: £ 2596.85

Court Fee: £ 105.00

Solicitors Costs £ 80.00

Total: £ 2781.85

Date of Issue: 05-JUN-2015

Claimant

Name: LOWELL PORTFOLIO I LTD

Address: PO BOX 1419, NORTHAMPTON

Postcode: NN2 1BU

Reference:

 

 

Address for sending documents and payments (if different)

Name: LOWELL SOLICITORS LIMITED

Address: ELLINGTON HOUSE, 9 SAVANNAH WAY, LEEDS

Postcode: NN2 1BU

Tel: 0113 3353339

Reference:

 

Defendant (1st)

Name:

Address:

Postcode:

Defendant (2nd)

Name: MRS

 

Address: 213

 

Postcode:

 

 

Particulars of Claim

THIS CLAIM IS FOR 2404.49, THE AMOUNT DUE UNDER AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ORIGINAL CREDITOR AND THE DEFENDANT TO PROVIDE FINANCE AND / OR SERVICES AND / OR GOODS. THIS DEBT WAS ASSIGNED TO / PURCHASED BY LOWELL PORTFOLIO I LTD, ON 30/08/2011 AND NOTICE SERVED PURSUANT TO THE LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 PARTICULARS RE- SHOP DIRECT A/C NO xxxxx, AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS 2404.49 THE CLAIMANT ALSO CLAIMS STATUTORY INTEREST PURSUANT TO S.69 OF THE COUNTY ACT 1984 AT A RATE OF 8% PER ANNUM FROM THE DATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF THE AGREEMENT TO DATE BUT LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF ONE YEAR AND A MAXIMUM OF 1000 AMOUNTING TO 192.36

 

Judgment Details

Judgment Amount £ 2596.85

Total Costs £ 207.00

Sub Total £ 2803.85

Paid Before Judgment £ 0.00

Total£ 2803.85

Instalment Amount £ 50.00 Period Monthly

First or Full Payment Date06-AUG-2015

 

 

Not sure if that came out correctly?

 

I have removed the ref numbers, and my name and address. But as you can see I have left in the house number the ccj was registered in. Not my number,

 

As i said I have lived here over 20 years and letters from lowell and their solicitors have arrived at the right house.

 

 

I remember getting a letter from Bryan Carter Solicitors saying the account was now being handled by them but nothing from them about court proceedings. How could i know or defend that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So time for a set aside then

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the claim form had arrived at the correct address...would you have had a valid defence to defend the claim ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

was the debt not already statute barred at the time of the claimform? I think it was?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The last payment i made was 2/7/12 so would not have been statute barred until 2/7/18? So when I should have received the claimform in 2015 it was not SB.

Would i be able to claim that since i only found out about the ccj, 24/9/18, it is now statute barred? Due to them submitting the wrong address on the claim ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No

Cant see a defence then

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given that the judgment is not registered to the correct address and also that it does not appear on your CRAs or RT...they will have difficulty trying to enforce the judgment until such time they make application to correct the address.

 

Do they state what action they would possibly take?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So it does....

 

Okay well they cant issue a Warrant of Control...because it will have the wrong address on the warrant.

 

They could issue an Attachment of Earnings if they can find you and know your employer...assuming you are in gainful employment.

 

They could seek a charging order...but only after they have corrected the address on the judgment....assuming you have a mortgaged home.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't own my home, and i'm not in work.

 

:becky: Then nothing to worry about

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...