@FTMDavei would go with the previous photographs they also captured recently i am giving them headings so will upload again here so far i have   Bank statement Day photos and night photos    I did not understand your previous post regarding article from local rag and governments cops      

Copy one of their letters and attach it to a cca request.   DX

N244 and the fee without a hearing as I would consider its not required as you will be attending anyway shortly would be £108.00

Hey everyone - back off holiday now and I thought I would update you on how the conversation went    the judge brought up the fact I part admitted to £2,500,   I explained at the time this was because I was dealing with CST Law and this was the amount I was trying to agree to pay to close the case,   I wasn't admitting to anything and since filling that out I realised I made a mistake    the judge explained I could submit paperwork to the court to withdraw that part admission at a cost £200-£350.   if this is worth doing I will but I wanted to seek advice here first? apologise I don't recall what the exact document was called    The judge said we would have to attend court in person (in the area I live) in around 6 weeks    I'm waiting on a letter from the court which should be arriving this week    The claimant's solicitor wanted to request a 4-hour slot but the judge rejected that explaining this matter doesn't need to take up any more of the courts time and 2 hours will be adequate   The claimant said they will be bringing 2 witnesses     the judge asked if we would want mediation - we both agreed however I haven't had any communication from them as of yet but I explained I'd be happy to stop this going any further if we can come to an agreement on the sum    I explained to the judge I've never been in a position like this in my life and I never gained anything financially after leaving British gas i.e. i went back to my old job on less pay where I still remain today    he took his time to explain things which I didn't understand and he seemed quite reasonable, he will also be the judge when I have to attend court. 

I'd just like to add - the HMRC rep was very sympathetic, as was the Judge, and even HMRC called it a 'scam', and said I'd done everything possible LBA, ICO, MCOL, etc, which was good.   It was almost like they both could understand what's happened, but as per their job roles and the law, can't do anything to help me.   There's some part of me, however, that feels like the Judge has given this extension for a formal reply to HMRC's application to strike off as she wants me to have a "fair" and "just" appeal   so has given me more time to "look into those 2 cases" and "further study them to pick relevant parts", and provide further evidence as to why I believe my case should move forward.   Almost like, she knows what will work in order to move it forward and the proof I need, and wants to give me time to find it... without telling me what it is... if that makes sense?   I could be wrong.