Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot Letter Of Claim - old HSBC OD - all fees


iamgnome

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As long as you haven't paid or admitted the debt is yours, then they can't go to court.

You have an absolute defence.

Of course they'll threaten and Try, but there will be nothing they can do

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

poss .

in strict legal speak, its DN+14 days but if you made or used the AC after that date or never well before DN then its arguable the DN is faulty.

i would take the latest of the above

 

if it is SB then fire them off our SB letter from the debt collection section of our library

but you must be 1000% sure and sometimes its better not to kick pram wheels till they do ...

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers id nail them in their box

 

dx

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Thanks for reopening this old thread! I'm back with an update.

Cabot's lawyers have sent me the below letter:

We are instructed to start legal action within 26 days if we do not hear from you regarding your outstanding balance.

We will obtain a CCJ if we do not hear from you. 

As mentioned, I'm certain that the debt is now SB'd. Likewise, I haven't paid anything to Cabot or admitted that the debt is mine.

They MIGHT claim that I made a payment after the default. If you remember, I did an SAR with Cabot and they tried to bluff a phantom payment. 

So, I'll aim to fire off the SB letter and if it goes to court then I'll defend that a) it's definitely SB'd and if needed, b) any payment Cabot are claiming is false and can be proved by xyz.

Does that sound about right? Thanks as always, for your help with this long running saga!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yea just fire off the SB letter by 2nd class stamp

get free proof of posting from any po counter.

and as per the CONC in  the letter, start a diary now.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX, will aim to do that asap.

A thought that came to my mind.

The letter they sent doesn't have a 30 day deadline and I received it by email.

Is that against the rules or have I got it wrong?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so this was an email not a royal mail letter.

they use email as a free way to p'haps scam mugs that know no better.

not sure what this 30 days is you are going on about?

send the SB by surface mail get free proof of posting.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant send a letter of claim by email, even if that what was attached to it. .

you are confusing yourself.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just an update on this.

Turns out they did send a physical letter, but it had a completely different date to their online one.

They also sent a chaser to their email, threatening to apply for CCJ.

Have ignored the emails and replied to the physical letter.

Will let you know what happens next...

Link to post
Share on other sites

with the sb letter nothing else no?
dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update:

Cabot's lawyers have responded to my letter.

Their response was on email.

They claim I made a payment in 2018.

I've checked my bank account and there's nothing that was paid at the time that they claim.

As expected, this is the phantom payment scam they tried before.

If this is the best they have then I'm 100% sure the debt is now SB'd and they're desperate.

Is it worth replying i.e. you're wrong and I'll contest this at court, so don't contact me any further. Or shall I wait it out until LBC

Cheers

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

emails can be ignored.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update on this… letter received from Cabot's lawyers saying they'll send an LBC in a week.

Kind of bizarre that they're giving me a warning, but I'll let you know if I do get the LBC.

Am I right that my WS is going to be along the lines of: debt is SB'd, they are wasting court's time and making up fraudulent payments?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

WS?
defence.

twill be exactly the same as our sb letter .

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...