Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
    • Thanks a lot.  I did read every single post and though the process was fairly clear at a high level, I just wanted to be sure in the areas a posted. Call it first time nerves, going down this route.  Thanks again.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Backdoor CEL CCJ -


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2055 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've now received the claim particulars but it doesn't seem to have any details of what and when did I do or what is the whole thing about? How do I get that ?

Concerned of losing time as well...

Also does it surely mean one calendar month I have is from 16th Nov?

There are date from October on this paper as well and not sure what significance they carry to meet for paying within a month clause..

 

Case details.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

then apply for set aside and then ask for strike out under CPR16.4 no basis for claim as particulars dont give any cause for action. This may well not be successful but at least you will make then show why they are claiming from you.

As already said, the CCJ will be scrubbed when you are successful, even if it was 5 years afterwards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't... Get that set aside moving

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why would you want to pay a bunch of thieves money you dont owe? If you do that the CCJ stays anyway. so you will have just wasted your money.

Go and get the N244 done and you will see off both the CCJ and beat these bandits to get your court fee back and a few quid for your troubles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW I looked closely and the reference number in the letter worked in PCN field to pay it off (https://www.ce-service.co.uk/pay-now.asp)

I have what I'd need to pay it off.

I can completely see your point dear members.

My circumstances are what's making me feel more inclined towards taking a quicker (unreasonable waste of money though I agree) route to pay off now and reach out to court to let them know I've done so.

I hope I'd get some sort of e-mail confirmation when I make the payment though it might not have CEL's reference number on it which court might ask for..

I need to apply for Security vetting for work, apply for citizenship etc. very soon and it might just add to my worries to carry on with those applications with this CCJ on my records...

Link to post
Share on other sites

why?

a ccj does not effect citizenship...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, my apprehension of not going for set-aside is

1. Failing to notify DVLA of change of address for more than a year while being registered keeper of the vehicle.

2. Date of event on claim details I've received from county court is from Feb 2016.

I had moved out of my previous address where CEL might have sent letters etc. in November 2015.

What grounds do I have if judge asks me why did I have car registered at an address from where I had moved out 3 months back, which caused CEL to send all letters to the address DVLA holds for me.

Most likely CEL would also know in cases where they win by default is because vehicle was registered at old address and that is a backdoor for them to exploit about negligence of registered keeper of the vehicle.

Probably someone from CEL would be looking at this thread and preparing ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

bowcreek said:

Again, my apprehension of not going for set-aside is

 

1. Failing to notify DVLA of change of address for more than a year while being registered keeper of the vehicle. - so what that's for the DVLA to deal with IF they want too.

2. Date of event on claim details I've received from county court is from Feb 2016.

I had moved out of my previous address where CEL might have sent letters etc. in November 2015. - so what

What grounds do I have if judge asks me why did I have car registered at an address from where I had moved out 3 months back, which caused CEL to send all letters to the address DVLA holds for me. - nothing to do with your case

Most likely CEL would also know in cases where they win by default is because vehicle was registered at old address and that is a backdoor for them to exploit about negligence of registered keeper of the vehicle. - same as any DCA does with civil debt. - purposeful exploitation of the court system.

Probably someone from CEL would be looking at this thread and preparing ...

- to LOSE

as EB has explained, they don't and wont appear in court

go read the other CEL claimform threads here.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are you here whinging about something that cannot happen or is beyond your control instead of either taking the advice given and researching it further or just paying up.

All your reasons for not going for a set-aside are just figments of your imagination. It is a civil court, the judge isn't interested in the technical details of your keeper details as long as you can show that you weren't at that address when the court documents were served there you will win part 1.

Part 2 is where you have to fight the claim itself and if CEL cant be arsed to supply the correct information to court they lose anyway, if you can show that they are procedurally wrong they lose again. The worst thing that can happen is that they won and you are left in the same boat as you are now but with the CCJ wiped from your records. Even that is a win because that is why you came here in the first place.

You cannot wipe off the CCJ without going for set-aside so again you cannot make an out of court arrangement, you are months too late for that. Basically you are stuck with it for the next 6 years and that is whether you pay the order or not. This has been explained twice but you think that wishing things were different will somehow miraculously change them to what you want.

If you want help with the parking claim we will be glad to help you but you have to start things off, we cant turn up to court with your cheque book and fill out the form for you. the N244 can be downloaded, as can most court forms.

 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have a CCJ, you need to contact the court and have the judgement "set aside" This will then make the court send information to the plantiff and a date for a hearing will be issued.

You will then be able to have your 15 mins to argue why you have a CCJ.

Oh, and be sure you have the right address :-)

I don't think there is a charge for setting aside, don't think I paid anything when I had to do it, but its the only way of getting anything done.

If of course you can prove that the CCJ should not be there in the first place, you can request to have it removed.

Otherwise, if they refuse and you get stuck with it, its on your credit file for 6 years.

 

Point to note, if you have been at your new place on the electoral role for over 2yrs, then if you have not "associated" your old address with the new address then try and keep them separate! That way the CCJ will remain at the old house.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lots of rather bad advice and myths there I'm afraid.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Dear members

, I received 3 x CCJs last year to do with Private parking firms but every time i came across them well on time with help of my credit score agency and decided to pay up in full within 1 month of judgement date.

Just checked for any judgements for peace of mind by paying up for a report and report says "Nothing Registered"

Question is - I've been offered a job which needs an external company to carry on pre employment checks and one of the questions on the form is

"Have you ever had civil proceedings taken against you by creditors e.g CCJ or IVA?, if yes please provide details."

What is the right thing to do?

Should I say No based on report I just ran?

Or should I say yes and put a note explaining why did I get it (all comms sent to wrong address and claimant won by default) and that its all paid up in full?

How do these agency check such record?

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If all paid up within the 28 dys, no judgment registered, so nothing for them to see.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just tell them no. Nothing will appear on any record because nothing is entered until 28 days after the CCJ is granted.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a shame you didn't challenge the CCJs rather than just pay them.

However whichever strategy you followed, strictly speaking civil proceedings have been taken against you. I don't know if there is a way to find out whether you have been taken to Court for a debt perhaps by checking Court records at the time of the hearing. The problem is that if you say no and it later transpires that records are found you could be in far more serious trouble than admitting what happened and how you resolved them.

I understand the predicament you are in and the fact that nothing is showing on the CCJ register. However by saying no, which is untrue, you could miss out on this job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesnt matter if proceeding were taken. Nothing is on the register so the CCJ doesnt exist. Payment within 28 days wipes it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure they understand what they are asking..

An iva is not civil proceedings.

 

Type out the question verbatum please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pers id say no then

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appear to be in the minority here. If you are not going to admit it bear in mind a couple of things. Even though you say there was no hearing because you weren't there, each case was heard in Court as they didn't know you weren't going to be there. So there will be a record at that Court with the name of the parking company and your name on that date. Also in the future what would you do if in a position of authority you had to make a decision about an employee who had lied on their application.

 

You could try ringing one of these vetting type on companies and ask if they could trace someone who had paid off a ccj within a month .[You might have to make up some story that your company is looking for that kind of service as financial probity is very important in your profession and is that the sort of service that they could provide].

 

The other question I have is how did you not manage to prevent the second and third tickets from going to Court. A mail redirect would surely have nipped them in the bud.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appear to be in the minority here. If you are not going to admit it bear in mind a couple of things. Even though you say there was no hearing because you weren't there, each case was heard in Court as they didn't know you weren't going to be there. So there will be a record at that Court with the name of the parking company and your name on that date. Also in the future what would you do if in a position of authority you had to make a decision about an employee who had lied on their application.

 

I'll join you in that minority. The question the employer check asks isn't "Have you ever had a CCJ?" it's "Have you ever had civil proceedings taken against you by creditors?" A CCJ is just an example. So is the answer to the question they actually ask 'Yes' or 'No'?

Link to post
Share on other sites

TBH they wont give a toss about a CCJ from a parking co when you moved house,

it is not about whether you can manage your finances or not which is what they are interested in.

 

If you say no then if they search the register will your name appear?

they cant do a search for names of people were sued whose cases were settled becuase no such list exists.

 

Again, what about if you were taken to court and the judge decided the claimant was an out and out rogue,

that wouldnt appear on the list of claim numbers and names so when they ask about this they are saying FOR EXAMPLE as their list isnt exhaustive and certainly isnt accurate when considering the question.

 

People who sue arent always creditors.

You could be sued for damages caused by your dog biting next doors cat

so a CCJ for that wouldnt need to be nentioned even though you hadnt paid the order

 

So whatever you say wont be wrong or right because it isnt a proper question.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Backdoor CEL CCJ -
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...