Jump to content

AS parking windscreen PCN - stopped for 10mins - Failure to pay and display - Bluff Inn Car Park, Hayle Cornwall

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1061 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

I have been looking at keeper liability and it is an interesting read. I looked at the KADOE contract from three years ago (not seen an updated one-yet) where it implies that if PoFA is not used, keeper liability can be argued. We have known this for a while.



Within the KADOE contract is a part about keeper liability as defined in schedule four, paragraph eight which say's:-





As AS parking are members of the IPC and do not rely on PoFA (in the majority of cases) it seems to me that they have no right to apply for keeper details from the DVLA



AS parking have taken 1 case to court this year. That speaks volumes

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

If they have no right to apply for Keeper details then can I use this to my advantage? Would be great if I can turn the tide and try to prosecute them.

I have had debt recovery notification that they say needs my response or they will take it that I was the driver at the time and am liable.


More tripe?


Letter has gone to the bluff btw (Polite one) on the 3rd of november.


Basically it says that I would invite them to have the PCN cancelled as I was not the driver and I would hate to leave a negative review on trip advisor about the company they use on their property as I believe it would not be good for business.


I'm still waiting for a reply.


Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to swot up on the law, general contract law and the POFA in particular and then you will realise that their threat to assume that you were the driver is utter twaddle and designed to scare you into doing or saying somehting. If they honestly dont know they are wrong on this point then they will learn an expensive lesson if they try that on with a court claim.


No, they are more than likely just incompetent liars and have lots of history to support this opinion.

Still nice to see DR+ havent changed their stock letter and I dont see where it says the point you are worrying about.

Link to post
Share on other sites


  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...