Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you Andy    The Court have not confirmed solicitors so we shall proceed as agreed with the DQ by 25 January 2021.
    • Yes it should be in the UK forum. Are you able to move this to the corect forum?
    • why is this in the overseas forum? as you or steadypay not in the UK?   dx  
    • I recently applied for a Sure Start Maternnity Grant and received a decision from the DWP today, declining my eligibility; under the basis that there is another child (under 16) in my family/ household. My situation is this,  I am co-habitating with my partner/ father of my new/ first baby.  Within the last 10 months, my partner's daughter from previous relationship (age 13) had to be removed from her mothers care, owing to domestic violence issues.  The family Courts are still dealing with the situation as her mother is contesting her daughter residing with us, as she wants her to return to her home/ care - so obviously there is Social Sevices involved etc. Anyway, prior to this situation arising, my partners daughter, had always resided with her mother and my partner, had regular acess etc. I have cited the Sure Start Maternity Grant Act/ Policy and the more recently published 'Restricting payment of the SSMG to first child only' -  I have to say, both have left me further confused as if you read the 'restricting payment policy/ in one paragraph, it states that in a situation where a woman has her first child and another child under 16, residing in same household/ family and is from the partners 'previous relationship' this would be considered a 'first child' and will be eligible for payment of grant. If however, the reverse applies (ie: it is the 'father/ partner' first child, then payment would not be made.   This seems pretty straightforward, but then the policy starts to contradict itself and goes on to define, the only exception for payment to more than one child, is in the case of the child living in same household, is not from partner.  Or if you are adopting a child under 1 year old/ special guardianship etc, then you are eligible. It does not offer the scenario of any childd in household under 16, from partner previous relationship being acceptable?   Can anybody please clarify this point please???  I want to challenge the decision/ request a Mandatory Reconsideration - but wanted to include my reasoning/ the point of law they have not applied correctly?   Any help advice / greatly appreciated.   thank you 
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

all parking services uk ltd/re notice to keeper letter


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 880 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

i received today a notice to keeper penalty charge notice saying i had to pay 100 pound for an offence i did not commit i was not the driver.

 

the date that the offence was supposed to be committed on the notice to keeper letter was 30/08/16 which is a total fabrication as my car had not even manufactured then it was first registered in November 2017.

 

i think they made a boo boo about the alleged date the offence was committed,

 

any advice would be much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

welcome aboard

please complete this so's we have all the relevant info to help you:

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket

 

read it carefully its not a penalty charge notice..its a speculative invoice

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And do not reply to them and tell them about your car. Theyll try and change it to catch you out.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there

the notice to keeper letter was issued on 16/6/18 and i received the letter today 18/8/18

 

the date of offence according to letter was 16/8/16.

 

i dont know the exact date the alleged offence was supposed to take place as i was not the driver.

 

the offence was supposed to take place at st annes pier car park, st annes on sea, lancashire at 14:29 and alledged offence was failure to have on display a valid pay and display ticket.

 

the parking company was all parking services uk limited

 

i appealed straight away on their website and submitted the following;

 

today is roughly 730 days from when the alledged parking offence occurred(eg. 30/08/2016 according to your reminder)

therefore you have failed to maintain to the strict limits required to hold me as keeper liability.

your only recourse is with the driver and i have no compunction to assist you in that..

 

like i said at the time of the alledged offence my car did not exist and was only registered last november 2017.

by the way the car is a disability car as i am severely disabled

 

i also stated on the appeal form

 

that your allegation is not only unreliable but you have failed to meet the requirements of PUFA SCHEDULE 4 PARA 8 to hold the keeper reliable.

i got email back saying they would be in touch within 7 working days.

 

i also asked for the cancellation of the notice or the validation code to refer the matter to popla

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please keep to your thread posts moved to here from elsewhere.

 

can you scan up the NTK please

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the Forum Dennis.

I am trying to work out the dates you mention.

On your first post you said the Notice to Keeper said the offence occurred on the 30th August 2016 .

On post 4 you say that the NTK was issued on the 16th June 2018 and you received it on the 18th August 2018.

Then you said that the NTK claimed the date of offence was 16th August 2016 and not the 30th August as you said on post one.

 

Nothing really makes sense with the dates so a copy of the NTK would help clear at least one of the questions.

 

It is a pity that you wrote to them so quickly pointing out their error with the date, misspelling POFA and missing the fact that their claim was dead in the water as the NTK was two years out of date. They will now look at you as some one ripe for ripping off once they amend the date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have stitched yourself up like a kipper, keep alll correspondence safe.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you start from the beginning and post the info much more clearly please.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they meant the 16/8/18 they still have time to send out a correct NTK.

By responding without considering the consequences you may well have made things very complicated for yourself whereas keeping quiet until the 1st sept would have killed this stone dead.

crooks dont care if you are right or not, they are still crooks

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...