Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge .............. please fill out the Q&A ASAP. dx  
    • Well done on reading the other threads. If ECP haven't got the guts to do court then there is no reason to pay them. From other threads there is a 35-minute free stay after which you need to pay, with the signs hidden where no-one will read them.  Which probably explains why ECP threaten this & threaten that, but in the end daren't do court. As for your employer - well you can out yourself as the driver to ECP so the hamster bedding will arrive at yours.  Get your employer to do that using the e-mail address under Appeals and Transfer Of Liability.  
    • good you are getting there. Lloyds/TSb...i certainly would not be risking possible off-setting going on if a choice were there, but in all honestly thats obv too late now..., however..you might not never be in that situation so dont worry too much. regardless to being defaulted or not, if any debt that is not paid/used in 6yrs it becomes statute barred. you need to understand a couple of things like 'default' and 'default notice' a default is simply a recorded D in the calendar section/history of a debt, it does not really mean anything. might slightly hit your rating. the important thing here is a default notice , these are issued by the original creditor (OC) under the consumer credit act, it gives you 14 days to settle whatever they are asking, if you don't then they have the option to register a defaulted date on your credit file. that can make getting other credit more difficult. and hits your rating. once that happens, not matter what you do after that, paying it or not or not paid off or not, the whole account vanishes from your credit file on the DN's 6th b'day. though that might not necessarily mean the debt is not still owed - thats down to the SB date above. an OC very rarely does court and only the OWNER of a debt can instigate any court action (Attempted a CCJ) DCA's debt collection agencies - DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS they have ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter what it's TYPE. an OC make pass a debt to a dca as their client to try and spoof people into paying through legal ignorance of the above statement. an OC may SELL on an old debt to a DCA/debt buyer (approx 10p=£1) and then claim their losses through tax write off and their business insurance, wiping their hands of the debt. the DCA then becomes the debt OWNER. since the late 70's dca's pull all kinds of 'stunts' through threat-o-grams to spoof a debtor into paying them the full value of the debt, when they bought if for a discounted sum (typically 10p=£1). you never pay a dca a penny! if read carefully, NONE of their letters nor those of any other 'trading names' they spoof themselves under making it seem it's going up some kind of legitimate legal 'chain' say WILL anything....just carefully worded letters with all kinds of threats of what could/might/poss happen with other such words as instruct forward pass... well my dog does not sit when instructed too...so... DCA's SOMETIMES will issue a court claim, but in all honesty its simply a speculative claim hoping mugs wet themselves and cough up...oh im going to court... BIG DEAL DCA - show me the enforceable paperwork signed by me...9/10 they dont have it and if your defence is conducted properly, most run away from you . however before they do all that they now have to send a letter of claim, cause the courts got fed up with them issuing +750'000PA speculative claims and jamming up the legal system. so bottom line is two conclusions.... if you cant pay a debt, get a DN issued ASAP (stop paying it!) make sure it gets registered on your file then it stops hurting your file/future credit in 6yrs regardless to what happens (bar of course a later DCA CCJ - fat chance mind!)  once you've a registered DN , then look into restarting payments if the debt is still owed by the OC, if SOLD to a DCA, don't pay - see if they issue a letter of claim (then comeback here!).        
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Premier Parking windsreen PCN 22August 2012 - now Letter of claim from bwlegal [3rd july]


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2074 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

As the title, I had received a letter from BWLegal dated 3rd July 2018, regarding a ticket from nearly 6 years ago; 22August 2012.

 

 

Upon recieving the ticket in 2012, in my first instance I sent the following email to 'Premier Parking Solutions'

 

On returning to my car this afternoon I found a fixed penalty notice

on my drivers side window.

This was a terrible shock to me, knowing I had purchased a ticket from

the Pay and display ticket machine.

 

once inside my car I realised the ticket I had purchased was on the center console of the car,

I can assume that upon closing my car that the Non adhesive ticket that I had purchased and placed on the dashboard had been blown off by the gust of the closing of the drivers door.

 

I have taken a photo and attached the image so you can see the purchased ticket.

 

Please take this email as a formal appeal for the issue of the parking charge number …., with the reason why charged was issued ' No Valid ticket on display'

 

After a automated reply all that time ago, I received many letters from so called debt collectors, and after reading advise online; I ignored.

 

I did think after nearly 6 year, they would have dropped the case; not so.

 

I have shot myself in foot in regards to not being driver.

 

I have since contacted BWLegal, regarding the case within the 30 days they requested.

 

I have also sent them a photo of the ticket via email, and asked for all documents of proof;

They have now replied to the email with Photos of the car and the original letter of from Premier parking;

but not any signage.

 

What would my next course of action be?

Would it be to request a CPR 31.14 by post?

 

Is there any way of finding out if they have started court procedures?

 

As I think if I can delay them a couple more weeks I would have taken them over the 6 years (Statute of limitations for civil cases).

 

Thanks in advance

Edited by wickit
Title edit
Link to post
Share on other sites

the problem is you didn't find a fixed penalty notice.

 

a Private parking company cannot issue penalties...….

 

how did you contact BW was this by letter?

giving your present address?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the problem is you didn't find a fixed penalty notice.

 

a Private parking company cannot issue penalties...….

 

how did you contact BW was this by letter?

giving your present address?

 

Hi

Thanks for the quick reply.

My first contact to BW was via email.

 

This was their reply

 

Good Morning



Thank you for your recent email, the contents of which have been noted on file.

Should you wish to discuss this matter via email, please confirm the following:



1.Please complete your full name



2.Please provide first line of your address



3.Please provide your postcode

 

Of which I did

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

id sit on your hands

 

if they don't file a claim by 22nd they are out of luck

 

its unlikely they will as the letter doesnt say will anywhere if you read it properly

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now they are running out of time to start proceedings

I wouldnt suggest sitting on your hands but as you have identified yourself as the driver years ago they can chase you

 

I would be tempted to leave it a week and then state "that there was no breach of contract as you paid the prescribed fee at the time and put it to strict proof as to what condition of parking was breached and who the contract was with.

 

Further to that can you prove your client has the authority to offer contracts to the public by way of the required planning permission under the Town and Country Planning Act 2007 as you are unable to find such a consent and you cannot enter into a criminal compact.

 

That doesnt mean that they Dont have the necessary permission, just that you cant find it and if they really want to take the matter to a court claim they will have to produce evidence of planning permission along with a shed load of other stuff that they will struggle with.

 

If the parking co was premier parking ltd then they are dead and buried and BWL dont have a client. Now there are other companies with similar names so if they use the wrong name do not query this or correct them at any point

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the advise given.

 

I had asked them to provide signage proof for the car park in question; this was end of last week,

 

They now have replied with the following...

 

 

Thank you for your recent email, the contents of which have been noted on file.



Please note that the matter is currently being queried and your file has been placed on a hold.



Confirmation of this has been sent through the post, you will be contacted in due course.

 

Does this mean now they may have now started court proceedings ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

what exactly did you sent and how did they get your email?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what exactly did you sent and how did they get your email?

 

I sent them photo proof of the ticket; this was included on the first email I sent them.

 

I made first contact with them via email when I first got the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok take 2

 

I had asked them to provide signage proof for the car park in question; this was end of last week,

 

what did you put/ask in you email...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no one suggested that, they now think that you are interested in paying them if they tell you something credible but not necessarily true.

 

 

No it doesnt mean they have started proceedings and by the time they get your next written letter (STOP EMAILING THEM) they will be statute barred from taking civil action anyway.

Thanks for all the advise given.

 

I had asked them to provide signage proof for the car park in question; this was end of last week,

 

They now have replied with the following...

 

 

Thank you for your recent email, the contents of which have been noted on file.



Please note that the matter is currently being queried and your file has been placed on a hold.



Confirmation of this has been sent through the post, you will be contacted in due course.

 

Does this mean now they may have now started court proceedings ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok take 2

 

I had asked them to provide signage proof for the car park in question; this was end of last week,

 

what did you put/ask in you email...

 

Many thanks for providing the photos and letter.

As stated if the letter of appeal.

'Parking at this site is only for vehicles that are parked in accordance with the site instructions, as detailed

on signage on site. This signage is clear, in excess of industry standards and clearly details any charges

that may be imposed should these restrictions be breached.'



Please could you ask your client to provide evidence of signage on the date in question.



Many Regards

 

 

Will no longer have email correspondence with them, will use recorded post from now.

:|

Edited by wickit
Link to post
Share on other sites

don't waste money on them!

use 2nd class with free proof of posting from PO counter

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

agree with the above.

POP from the PO counter is good enough as the law says the letter is delivered after 2/3 days whether they admit or deny it.

 

anyways, you are keeping quiet at the moment and letting the clock run down.

 

Block their email address whist you are at it so they have to use the post as well.

Make sure you bounce back the emails rather than just going into spam so they know you have done this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the initial letter from Bw have all the information on it as required by the GDPR article 14? If it doesn’t have the correct information pointing out your data rights then they have unlawfully processed your data which is a breach of statutory duty. You need to check the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...