Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • i'm gonna get a 2nd opinion on this and how you should re-order the above.   i really do think that you need to now clearly portray that the supposed belief that a payment was made you've now realised as a false flag.   the main thrust of your defence should be paperwork issues and how important those are to their successful case. then the  charges issue 
    • is it entitled letter of claim?   dx  
    • Hi could you clarify as it is still unclear about AX as to how they contacted you.   How did AX contact you? (phone, email etc)   How long was it after the accident that AX contacted you?   When AX informed you that you had nothing to pay as this would be paid by the insurance company did you contact your insurance company to verify this before agreeing to AX T&C for the courtesy car?      
    • Hi,   I have received a letter from pra group for a loan from 2013. I have never paid anything towards this loan and it’s no longer on my credit file. What do I do? 
    • Hi  I sold two graphics card to customers on eBay, i used the pacelink to create postage and drop off both items at the same parcel shop, my both parcel were tempered and both of different customer said they received the puppy training pads instead of graphics cards. I use the default insurance on both £25 each.   When i raised the claim to pacelink Hermes admitted for one the parcel that it was damaged, pacelink has issued me £25 which i told them i am not accepting but they still transferred the compensation into my account.   Both of items sold for £780 and £790 respectively. I had to refund both customer, in total it cost me £780+£789.   I want to claim my money back because my both parcels were tempered because i used clear tape when I packed the parcels and when customer received it it was packed with brown tape, in addition to that both customers received puppy training pads of same colour.   I have all the photo avoidance provided by the customers. Conveniently whenever i used royal mail customer received the items perfectly and this time i used Hermes through pacelink and both customer did not received the items.   I have 100% feedback on eBay and sold 5 graphics card in which two were lost through Hermes.    I did recording of both items when doing the packaging. when can been seen at the following urls.           I know the process that i have to write them a letter which i will sent at the following address. Please help me if you have any sample letter. Please help me if i am missing something   Hermes Parcelnet Ltd,  Capitol House,  1 Capitol Close,  Morley  LS27 0WH
  • Our picks

    • Ebay Packlink and Hermes - destroyed item as it was "damaged". https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/430396-ebay-packlink-and-hermes-destroyed-item-as-it-was-damaged/&do=findComment&comment=5087347
      • 25 replies
    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
  • Recommended Topics

Erudio refusing Deferment and saying that the debt has matured- help


Recommended Posts

  • 8 months later...

Thanks Andy! 
 

Update on this thread. We ignored letters sent in Feb as kindly advised by DX. So we have recently received this letter from Drydens Fairfax Demanding payment of the loan by 29/10.

 

however all loans have been deferred each year.

 

Not sure what to do next. Any advice would be great fully received! Thanks so much!

 

Doc 10-22-2020 17-35-02.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thats not a letter of claim as stated before...so safe to ignore

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it will

and it will have a reply pack.

 

ignore everything unless you get a PAPLOC.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

so eventually a letter of claim

 

has he sent a deferement form off for this year

and did you ever get an SAR off to SLC as advised Earlier.??

 

as for the PAPLOC you have 

but depending upon the answer to my q's above 

we may revise better on a suitable reply, but you must reply in 30 days.

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello. Yes we deferred this year and sent a copy of the doc deferment to erudio. Deferment was accepted by slc, didn’t request an SAR, must have overlooked that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

get an sar running to SLC today

it's free and can only help you.

 

let's see if that data returns before your 30days PAPLOC reply deadline 

but eitherway

comeback if you get it

or close to the 30 days if you don't

and we'll knock up a reply to drydens based upon our std format linked above

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Hey there DX. Please can you help with the reply to Erudio? We haven’t had anything back from SLC yet and it’s getting close to the 30days, I’d like to get something sent off to them if poss. 
 

thanks so much for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no don't reply early not due till the 30th.

have a look around various here already even one today being done

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

Hello there!  an update and a further question for you please.. 

 

Letter was sent back to Drydens Fairfax within  the 30 days disputing the claim due to student loans deferring the loans each year.  

 

Received a letter from Drydens on 11/12 acknowledging the letter,  saying that the account had been put on a temporary hold whilst they contact their client with details of the query and that they will inform us as soon as a response is recieved from their client.

 

Then yesterday another letter of claim arrives, exactly the same as the one they sent in Nov, with no response to the letter we sent back to them in response to the previous letter of claim that they sent in Nov.   

 

Do we just need to send another response back as we sent in Nov?

 

What are they playing at?

 

SLC never replied to the SAR that we sent off in Nov either.

 

Thanks again for your help with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post up the reply you sent please to pdf

Give slc a ring and find out what happened to the sar

We need both before you reply to drydens again

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Take the second option and ask them to email them.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sorry, not helpful to this but have been reading your other threads. Have you ever had confirmation whether Erudio are allowed to take away your right to have loan wiped after 25 years even if they’ve terminated. Guy at CAB says they can’t but thought you might know. Sorry to bother you if you don’t. Any other advice to my thread welcome if you have a sec x

Link to post
Share on other sites

already answered on your own thread TB.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...