Jump to content
InformedSearcher

Fridge Freezer 3.1/2 years old failed

Recommended Posts

Back in late October 2014 we purchased an Hitachi Fridge Freezer.

One of those amazing offers reduced from £499 to £349.

 

In mid April it failed with a code (5r) being displayed.

I called Argos and was advised that I should find a company to check it out and produce a report then they would make a decision.

The mention of 3 and a half years was an obstacle I was told.

Just how hard to find someone anyhow eventually (and a mini fridge purchase later) I find a local company.

 

2 visits and 2 hours later they decided it was an exceptionally small leak over time and repaired it.

They had a charge whatever plus an additional charge for the re-gassing.

 

Come late May I write to Argos and get a fobbed off reply that I used an unauthorised company (what?!) and they offer me a £30 store voucher.

This is NOT April the 1st.

 

I then reply again and again I get a letter after a month still offering a voucher and it appears I've been 'dismissed'.

 

On Sunday 5th August and two months has passed we are back to that '5r' fault display.

The unit has totally failed and I'm in despair.

What can I do?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst you may be able to argue and win compensation for the fridge/freezer not lasting a reasonable amount of time without any such faults, the compensation would only be the lost amount of lifetime the product should have left. So for sake of argument the life of the appliance was set at 6 years, you would be left with only 50% compensation. You then have to factor in costs of getting an engineers report into the faults, costs of taking Argos to Court if necessary.

 

And then there is the issue of whether you used a repairer that had relevant experience or qualifications.

 

See what others say, but I am not sure it is worth pursuing, even armed with Sale of Goods act legislation applying at the time you bought it.

Edited by dx100uk
quote

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its CRA now.

 

under those rules they had one chance at a repair [all be it , so called unauthorised, but it got done]

the cost of that should be met by argos in any settlement under a CRA claim

 

you now need to raise that CRA claim, inc those costs,

 

 

have a quick nose around for sale sites and have a look at the 2nd hand value of the same fridge from the same time frame.

 

that should give you an idea of its worth and that should ideally be the sort of figure argos should be offering you.

 

dx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for the reply.

 

Nosed around in vain! The value 'new' is now circa £249

 

Spoke to Argos and they are telling me £30 and that's final as I had it repaired unauthorised plus 'Gassing' is considered natural wear and tear.

I gave them a dozen chances to knock money off a new replacement and they totally refused.

 

The failure is back to what it was previously - Code 5r.

I cannot believe that they would not consider their decision and appeared uninterested that I might pursue this in a CC.

 

I look in amazement at the 'wriggling' to fob me off with them saying I got it repaired so it's no longer their problem.

Is there something I'm missing here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for the replies.

I decided to replace this with another one. I think way too much 'chasing up' with probably getting 'banned' from them for expecting something that was quite valid. Hopefully this will not happen again and alas the 'unauthorised' repairer never replied when I said their repair failed.

Something not to be repeated. :(

M

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please fill in your quit date here

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Tweets

  • Our picks

    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
      • 0 replies
    • 30 Day Right To Reject - Vehicle Casualty Report. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415585-30-day-right-to-reject-vehicle-casualty-report/
      • 9 replies
    • I am new here but very glad to find my way here and would welcome any input.
       
      i purchased a brand new campervan conversion from Hillside Leisure (175 miles from our home) on July 26th for £31,000 and, within 48 hours, during a storm, the alarm began to sound incessantly. We could not get it to stop, even after trying everything listed in the manual. We phoned Hillside on Saturday July 28th around 2.00pm. The young man who answered the phone said he would seek the advice of their technician and call us back, which he did. The technician told us that they, Hillside, couldn’t help, but that we should take the van to Nissan (the van is a Nissan) as the fault would lie with one of their components.
       
      • 42 replies
×
×
  • Create New...