Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I'm the type of person who has to understand how everything works.   That annoying kid in class who always has his hand up!
    • a court bailiff will not do that and fleecing DCA's cant use HCEO as its a regulated consumer credit agreement under £5k. you'll not find one CCJ thread here where this has ever been any diff. forget google! bit like the USA election was rigged and trump won twaddle.   stick with cag eh?   so use our search top right in the red banner backdoor CCJ whilst you await getting the info.      
    • please just type no need to keep hitting quote....   read what it says in red at the top of the CPR 31:14 template..carefully again.. i can see this thread continuing with these series of schoolboy errors and you screwing up if you dont learn to read and follow things carefully .   just send the CPR as is no need to worry about if or not something is applicable . they rarely respond anyway which is why we say don't miss defence filing date whatever happens..  
    • Stop worrying about bailiffs and read what dx100uk  has posted  ..........................................................
    • The two companies are lowell and cabot.   I'll get the information and come back with it.   I did do quite a bit of 'Google' research before coming on here. There's a lot of confusing information out there they seem to tell you half the story.   Just so I'm clear. Bailiffs in my situation, if authorised by a court. Can enter the property through an unlocked door and seizure goods? Or can they not do that with a consumer credit ccj? Or point me in the right direction so I can read up on it.   Thank you for your help. It's good to finally speak to somebody who tells you how it is.
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

PPM/gladstone W/screen PCN Letter Of Claim - New Gun Wharf- Gun Makers Lane London E3 - All ignored - Should I now pay??


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 932 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Evening All,

 

First of all I'd really like to thank you all for viewing my post and secondly I'd very much appreciate any advice you might be able to offer.

 

Location: New Gun Wharf, Gun Makers Lane, London E3

PPM Parking Sign is Attached

Letter from Gladstones is also Attached

Approx location of my car at the tie is also attached

 

On the 23rd December 2017 I went to visit a friend who lives in a private block of apartments.

 

To enter his block, you first turn off the main road Old Ford Road (which leads onto a small cobbled road (this is Gun Makers Lane which is double yellow lined and leads onto a park),

 

once on this road and about 20 metres in there is another left turn you can make onto a brick paved area which serves as a communal area for the the residents of the apartments

 

. It's worth noting, that this area has retractable bollards to enter, but they are always down for vehicle access.

 

There are always cars here but it is also worth noting that the block has underground parking for residents. (Its all very transparent if you google the location and do street view)

 

I wasn't really long at all, however on my return I discovered a parking ticket from Parking and Property Management Ltd.

 

It was dark and I really didn't bother to look for sign posts which outlined the conditions of parking there.

 

I shoved the ticket down the side of my car door and forgot about it.

 

Almost 7 months later I have received a 'LETTER BEFORE CLAIM' from Gladstones Solicitors, this letter is dated 17th July.

 

Aside from this notice, I do not remember receiving any other correspondence from these people.

 

I have trawled through my car and all my post again just to make sure and cannot find anything nor can I find the actual ticket

 

They are asking for a payment of £160 or they threatening to take legal action.

 

I have had previous experience with UK Parking Control and DRP in the past and have learned to just ignore these types of crooks, but on this occasion I'm not quite so confident given how many people I've seen go to court with PPM and Gladstones.

 

I am a fair driver and generally do not get tickets, and on the occasions I do I pay them if its fair and legit.

 

So guys on this occasion where do you think I stand with contesting the ticket?

 

Really look forward to any advice and thank you all in advance for you help

 

multipage PDF version of docs are now attached without refs

PPM Sign, Gladstones Letter, My Location v2.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pop your docs up as one multipage pdf please

Read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thread tidied

do you still have the NTK?

 

can you complete this please:

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Please see below;

 

1 The date of infringement: 23 Dec 2017

 

2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] N

 

have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days] ; I honestly can’t remeber receiving one, is there any way I can check?

what date is on it

Did the NTK provide photographic evidence?

 

3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?] : as above , cannot remember receiving NTK

 

4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK,

did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process? as above , cannot remember receiving NTK

[it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances]

 

5 Who is the parking company? PPM

 

6. where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? NEW Gun Wharf, Gunmakers Lane , London E3

Edited by dx100uk
format
Link to post
Share on other sites

ok good info gathering almost over so the experts in the morning have as much as you have to play with...

 

one last point...you have not moved or your car is not registered to the address gladdy's sent that too par chance..

just strange you would forget seeing a letter with photos of your car upon it..= NTK...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the images you uploaded.

Could you also please add a copy of the windscreen notice .

 

Do all the notices in the parking area say the same thing as some times where there are other signs ,they contradict each other.

 

Not quite sure what you mean by the successes of PPP and Gladstones.

PPP take only a small percentage of motorists to Court and have been described as an incompetent one man band. And Gladstones are a laughing stock. d

 

In any event from the one notice you have shown it would appear that parking is not allowed so you were trespassing. The landowner is therefore the only person who can sue not some mickey mouse parking company.

 

Please do not send off anything about trespass to them yet.

It will be better to get as much info as possible before totally blasting them out of the water.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys for both your replies, addressing your questions below

 

dx100uk : "you have not moved or your car is not registered to the address gladdy's sent that too par chance..just strange you would forget seeing a letter with photos of your car upon it.."

 

It's possible they did send it, as mentioned however I've had several issues with UKPC recently and it may have got shelved amongst those docs.

 

Right now unfortunately, I just cannot find it

- have honestly searched the flat high and low before coming here and had no luck

 

lookinforinfo: "Could you also please add a copy of the windscreen notice " - Unfortunately I do not have it

 

lookinforinfo: "Do all the notices in the parking area say the same thing as some times where there are other signs ,they contradict each other"

 

- There are three other signs in the vicinity and they are exactly the same

 

lookinforinfo: "Not quite sure what you mean by the successes of PPP and Gladstones"

 

- Apologies, I was only alluding to the fact that these guys seem to get motorists to react (judging by all the threads I've read here concerning these guys) ,

 

my approach with UKPC and DRP was to ignore them and eventually they went away.

 

I had no idea how many court cases PPM and Gladstones actually won but it would now seem hardly none if any, but for the most I do see that I will probably need to take some action on this occasion in the form of an actual response.

 

Really appreciate the feedback and attention so far, please let me know if you require anything else.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 signs in the vicinity. sorry, that is too vague, a sign around the corner wouldnt be considered to apply to where your car was parked for example

 

. So, what we need to see is any signage visible at the entrance to the private land from the public highway and if theyre isnt any then a picture of the entrance so you can show that no warning given.

 

secondly a picture of the signage present and its approximate size and where it is located.

 

Pictures showing the road layout, whether there is street lighting etc all helps.

 

Any thing that gives an indication of how visible the signage is from anywhere that a car could possibly be situated and be expected to be under the contract offered.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ericsbrother, thank you for your response.

 

I went back to the site and took a selection of pictures.

 

For context, I have also taken a pic of the satellite view of the area,

 

I have then annotated this showing the following;

1. The red arrows show my path from the main road to where I parked the car

2. The black stars are where all the parking signs are located

3. The gold oval with the black outline is where I parked my car

 

Seen together I think its quite intuitive and hopefully I have answered all your questions

 

Many thanks and look forward to your response

Car Location:Signage and Location.pdf

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK the really important thing is there is NOTHING at the entrance to the land to draw your attention to the fact they are offering you terms for parking so you can consider them and then decide to drive past if you dont agree with them. saying there are signs on the wall written in serbo-Croat wont impress, bags os cases about this if you dig deep.

 

Now they will argue that you must have seen the signs but the size, colour positioning etc all make this easy to argue against as you will have not had the opportunity to avoid breaching the conditions by the time you actually see the signs. That is like putting up a sign saying do not read this notice. A simple sign saying do not park here woudl make more sense.

 

As the signage is prohibitive in nature haoe can you accept the conditions and park? You cant so the only way of forming a contract is to break it which means there is no genuine offer to park.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...