Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof? 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No    Have you had a response?  n/a 7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice'  
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
    • Evening all,   So today, I was sent an updated offer that includes the £12.60 I spent on letters, but they have declined to add the interest at £7.40. They have stating 'We acknowledge your request to claim interest to date, however, this would be at the discretion of a trial judge if the claim did proceed to a trial hearing.' I think I am content with this outcome, and pushing this to a trial for a total interest of £15.30 throughout the claim does not make sense to me.   What are people's thoughts? I am sure our courts have better things to concentrate on?
    • FFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdfFFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdf 2pages T&C,s UCM
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Police motor penalty ( use a motor vehicle in a condition likely to cause danger of injury


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2090 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Got stopped by 4 traffic police cars (that were on a roundabout)

they checked insurance and driving license which was all good !

 

Then started looking around the car and said 3 tyres were rubbing as the car is lowered but not excessive (can send pictures on request)

 

They told me they didn't know if it was legal or not so they took pictures to send away to be examined. they also threatened to take my car away from me but in the end they let me drive away.

 

also the accident happened on 27th of june and I received the letter on 12 of july. does it matter that they sent the letter out later than the 14 day period ?

 

thanks

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

confused.com

 

Penalty?

Accident?

14 days?

 

So many questions :|

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section 127 Magistrates' Court Act 1980 states that for all summary offences the information must be laid within six calendar months of the commission of the offence, except where any other Act expressly provides otherwise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as they verbally told you about the NIP when you were stopped, then the 14 days means nothing. If they said something along the lines of "you will be reported for consideration of the question of prosecuting you" or similar, that's all they need do.

 

As they took photographs to verify I'm going to assume this was to add to the consideration to prosecute.

 

I may be wrong, of course. But a verbal NIP is all that is needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Said they were sending photos off to see what the outcome would be.S

they didn't actually say you will be reported for consideration of a motor vehicle in a condition likely to cause danger of injury.

 

when I asked am I getting done they said they didn't know its not upto them.

but they did read me my rights when speaking to me

Link to post
Share on other sites

A NIP is only required for certain, specified offences. (They are offences to which Section 1 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act applies - listed here) Use of a vehicle in a dangerous condition is not one of those offences. So no NIP is required at all - verbal or written, at the time of the offence or 14 days later. The whole question of NIPs or 14 day timelines simply doesn't arise.

 

The only relevant deadline is that in order to prosecute the OP for the offence they have to initiate court proceedings within 6 months, ie by late December.

Edited by dx100uk
Quote
Link to post
Share on other sites

IT SAYS

 

We have evidence that you were the driver of a vehicle REG MAKE OF CAR on DATE at the time 10.00 for the alleged offence :

Use a motor vehicle/ trailer in a condition likely to cause danger of Injury at THE PLACE I WAS STOPPED AT

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I understand the 14day period is useless

 

Is there anything I can do with the actually penalty or is it (it is what it is and my own fault)

 

They let me drive away so could that be used for anything ?

 

Just confused at the moment sorry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope its marked on your insurance its modified

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope its marked on your insurance its modified

 

 

Yes was marked of mods but no longer have insurance on the car as took it off the road the same day to let the dust settle

 

so what I really want to know is where do I stand with this penalty ?

 

Is there anything I can do with the actually penalty or is it (it is what it is and my own fault)

 

They let me drive away so could that be used for anything ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to tell us what has actually happened.

 

What is the letter you speak of?

What does it tell you?

Does it make an offer of a Fixed Penalty?

Does it say the matter is still under consideration?

Does it say that court action is being taken?

 

Just what options does it give you.

All you have mentioned at present is a letter and "an actual penalty".

What actual penalty?

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Something's not quite right here.

You mention 4 police cars on a roundabout.

I take it it was an operation.

 

You mentioned lowered suspension and tyres rubbing,

then after an accident,

then no accident,

then insurance are aware of modifications but its not insured now " to let the dust settle" ????

 

You were informed at the roadside.

The police took pictures.

Put the pictures onto this thread.

 

They have 6 months to inform you.

I think with a lot of smoke and mist in your story so far I think you should pay the fine n take the points.

 

Unless your going to exactly tell what happened and put the pictures up

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to tell us what has actually happened.

 

What is the letter you speak of? What does it tell you? Does it make an offer of a Fixed Penalty? Does it say the matter is still under consideration? Does it say that court action is being taken?

 

Just what options does it give you. All you have mentioned at present is a letter and "an actual penalty". What actual penalty?

 

WHAT HAPPENED -

Got stopped by 4 traffic police cars random check as they were all on the roundabout (no I wasn't speeding or driving silly)

they checked insurance and driving license which was all good !

 

Then started looking around the car and said 3 tyres were rubbing as the car is lowered but not excessive

 

They told me they didn't know if it was legal or not so they took pictures to send away to be examined. they also threatened to take my car away from me but in the end they let me drive away.

 

That's what basically happened just waiting around most of the time while they checked things

 

LETTER SAYS

 

We have evidence that you were the driver of a vehicle (REG MAKE OF CAR) on (DATE) at the time 10.00 for the alleged offence :

Use a motor vehicle/ trailer in a condition likely to cause danger of Injury at (THE PLACE I WAS STOPPED AT)

 

 

If you wish to contest this allegation in court you may do so in writing to the traffic process unit at the address above.

 

If you do don't wish to do so then it may be possible to deal with the matter by fixed penalty of £100 and the endorsement of 3 penalty points on your license without the need for court proceedings.

 

 

YOU HAVE 28 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE TO TAKE UP THE CONDITIONAL OFFER

 

 

If you wish to accept the conditional offer please complete the details on the slip below and follow the relevant instructions for driving license and payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowered but not excessive??

 

The tyre were rubbing!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simple then.

 

You can either accept the offer of a fixed penalty or opt for court action.

 

If you go to court and plead guilty it is absolutely pointless.

Assuming this its in England or Wales you will face an income related fine (reduced by a third for your guilty plea),

a surcharge of 10% of the fine (minimum £30),

£85 costs and three points.

This will amount to considerably more than £100.

 

If you plead Not Guilty you will face a trial where the prosecution will produce evidence to show you committed the offence.

You will have your opportunity to provide evidence to show that you are not guilty.

 

The cost of failure is high: you will face the same fine (but with no reduction), the same surcharge (obviously higher because the fine will be higher) but costs of at least £300 and possibly up to £620 - and the same three points.

 

The choice is yours.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea take the fpn.

 

Your tyres are rubbing on the inside of your wheel wells. They haven't been modified so you can turn full lock to full lock when car is at maximum weight.

I also suspect that you have not modified your exhaust system so I does not ground and more than likely your suspension coils are "cut" to lower suspension rather than shorter stiffer ones fitted.

 

You have so many cuts and grooves in the sidewall of your tyres its a wonder you have not had a blow out. Picture 2 shows this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well. From the VOSA Categorisation of Defects handbook. Part 2 (which covers passenger cars), Section 9 (Bodywork).

 

Insufficient clearance between wing and tyre. Wing rubbing or likely to rub on tyre, particularly when laden, and thereby cause damage to the tyre or a danger of injury.

 

Based on your second picture, you're going to have a hell of a job arguing that point if you chose to take this to court.

 

My advice: Take the offer of an eFPN, the £100 and 3 points will be much cheaper than what will happen when (not if) you're found guilty in court.

 

Oh, and sort your suspension out so that the tyres don't rub on the wings :thumb:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...