Jump to content


PEA windscreen PCN - changed car needed new res permit **WON@POPLA no current contract**


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 690 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

Hi everyone,

 

just to let you know that I was successful in winning my appeal at POPLA in October.

 

It has been very stressful and really affected me to the point that the whole thing made me unwell.

 

Thank you all for your help and assistance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What won it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dk100uk, have cut and paste the conclusion below:

 

'The appellant states that the operator has provided no evidence to confirm that they have landowner authority to issue the PCN.

 

Section 7.1 of the BPA Code of Practice states: “If you do not own the land on which you are carrying out parking management, you must have the written authorisation of the landowner (or their appointed agent)”.

 

Section 7.3 continues: “7.3 The written authorisation must also set out: a the definition of the land on which you may operate, so that the boundaries of the land can be clearly defined b any conditions or restrictions on parking control and enforcement operations, including any restrictions on hours of operation c any conditions or restrictions on the types of vehicles that may, or may not, be subject to parking control and enforcement d who has the responsibility for putting up and maintaining signs e the definition of the services provided by each party to the agreement”.

 

In order to prove that it has the necessary landowner authority to issue the PCN, I would expect the operator to provide written landowner authority or a valid witness statement to rebut the appellant claims.

 

However, the operator has only provided a document that confirms that the landowner has extended a contract. I cannot determine from the extension what the operator’s responsibilities are and whether it has authority to issue PCN’s. The appellant has raised other grounds of appeal. However, I do not consider it necessary to consider these, as I have already allowed the appeal on the above basis.

 

Accordingly, I do not conclude that the operator has correctly issued the parking charge and will allow the appeal'.

 

Very stressful ordeal!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done to you for not giving in!

 

The second victory on the forum in a few hours today, brilliant news.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great stuff.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey popla must be toughening up

Think? ThaT the 1st time weve ever seen them get involved in land ownership/contract issues??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under the old POPLA contract with the London parking adjudicators scheme this was always a big thing but since it went to Ombudsmanservices ltd the they seemed to accept a contract existed if the parking co said they had one rather than demanding to see it.

 

God to see they have toughend up on this.

Also you used to get to see what evidence the parking co had and get an opportunity to rebut it.

now they get to see yours and rebut but you cant see what they claim, only POPLA.

That could be awkward at some point in the future for them

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...