Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
    • Please provide advice on the following situation: I rented out my property to four students for 16 months until March 2024. Initially, the property was in very good condition, but now it needs extensive renovation. This includes redoing the bathroom, replacing the kitchen, removing wallpaper, and redecorating due to significant mould growth. The tenants also left their furniture on the grass, which is owned by the local authority. As a landlord, I've met all legal requirements. It seems the damage was caused by poor ventilation—windows were always closed, and heating wasn't used. There was also a bathroom leak fixed by reapplying silicone. I tried to claim insurance, but it was denied, citing tenant behaviour as the cause by looking at the photos, which isn't covered. The deposit barely covers the repair costs, or else I'll have to pursue money claims, which I've never done before and am unsure about its legal complications or costs. Any thoughts on this?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moneybarn charges and default notice


dottymcdotty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1716 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks..... so you can see they refer to in their particulars of claim an order pursuant to s92 0f the CCA1974......

 

The court order confirms the claimant do recover...so they have their order....but it does not state pursuant to s92.

 

But the order is suspended and that you must make payments and adhere to that order.

 

Now read the Take Notice Box .....It states on the order that your goods " may " be removed and other methods of enforcement " may " be used.....if you fail to pay in accordance...and that you should contact your court office about what you can do.

 

So the Order is very ambiguous and not black and white...and I still think you should make a further N245 to suspend/stay it again for the reasons which you know.

 

Ask for a senor member of your County Court to confirm.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread tidied

So the dn figure contains +£300 of unlawful penalty charges in its figure too

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

see what andy says

but in terms of the section 87 rules

the sum stated on a default notice should not contain any fees.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its all water under the bridge now...points should have been raised at the hearing you didn't attend....and taking into consideration point 9 of the claimants witness statement.

 

I have been digging and found what I think counters the order you have uploaded N32(2) Judgment for Delivery of Goods under section 133(1)(i) Consumer Credit Act 1974 suspended.

 

There is also a court form N32(4) Variation Order (Return of Goods) Order on application under section 130(6) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Time Order)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy I did attend the hearing but was unaware of any of this so didn't know to raise it!

I've had the civil enforcement officer on the text this morning threatening to turn up at my work if I don't hand the car back today!

I simply cannot have him coming to my work! Has he got the powers to do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

which company?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they're not bailiffs or enforcement agents

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy are you able to Outline in laymans terms what you think the next steps should be?

What do I do with the last information you posted.

It might also help others reading the thread to have this simplified.

 

I am most likely going to pay recovery fees too just to get rid of the horrible mess

- it doesn't sound like I have any legal grounds to contest any of it.

 

Interestingly on their website it states they have a no recovery no fee policy.

If this is the case I will be asking them to clarify why they are charging me?

 

Thanks again

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi have already give my answer in post #52.....but to add...

 

The last post refers to when you submit a time order to vary the Order....

 

N32(2) Judgment for Delivery of Goods under section 133(1)(i) consumer credit Act 1974 suspended.(thats what you already have the order)

 

N32(4) Variation Order (Return of Goods) Order on application under section 130(6) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Time Order) Is when you make a Time Order.

 

 

But I dont think you need to do that because thats to be made if you wish to vary the monthly payments when your struggling to adhere to the courts ordered payments.

 

Your problem is you missed a payment....bank glitch or Moneybarn glitch...not sure and there was some doubt about the correct payment date.

 

Well the payment dates are stated on the court order..the court set them...not Moneybarn

 

Now there is no direct instruction anywhere on the internet as to what the creditor must do if a debtor defaults on a suspended return of goods order or what the debtor can do. I would assume the creditor must apply for a Writ of Delivery ?

 

On the N32 it already states the court has granted the ROG order...but suspended providing you adhere.There is nothing in the CPR which advises if the claimant has to submit anything further or whether you can submit anything to stop recovery.

 

The only forms possible are the Time Order

 

Application to stay the recovery N245 or N244 to request an order.

 

If you was dealing with normal company they would be understanding as to the reason and glitches happen and would show a little leniency...but Moneybarn appear not to and are more concerned with recovering their customers cars rather than providing an excellent service.

 

So thats as far as I can advise...hence why I stated ask for a senior member of your local court....Case Manager etc etc...not the receptionist.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

And I would definitely not pay any recovery fess..not a penny...just make sure your account is up to date and paid on the courts dates.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Andy - worried if I don't pay fees they will still take the car.

 

Is there a way I can get the courts to change the date on the order?

I was so overwhelmed at being in court alone I wasn't able to request it at the hearing.

 

Also the recovery agent is continually texting me and threatening to go to my work to find me.

 

Moneybarn have had a payment ,

why do I need to liaise with him?

 

He's very persistent and in view of the website I assume he's trying to recover irrespective so that he gets paid.

 

How do I make him leave me alone?

 

Thanks so much again

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply use the link in post #10 to change payment date.....you cant change the court order directly.

 

With regards too recovery fees..they have not recovered the vehicle and no need to recover as the missed payment was due to an error beyond your control.If they had liaised with you they would have saved them the hassle of instructing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any security staff at work?

  • Haha 1

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Ok they're back!!

 

The whole matter is now in the high complaints department being investigated !

Payments are up to date now ( except these fees that I shouldn't even be charged as he hasn't recovered anything!)....

 

I was told the account was on hold as I requested to change the payment date to the 27th and Moneybarn said they could not do this until the complaint had been investigated!

 

I went out today , returned home to find the agent had been back today to get the vehicle!

 

Tried to call Moneybarn to find out what the heck is going on and of course they are shut!

So it seems they are saying one thing on one hand and doing another on the back ground!

 

The anxiety is making me ill, I don't want my neighbours knowing my business, I don't want him turning up to my job!

Is there any way I can tackle this through the courts?

With such little time and cost outstanding , I will not give up the vehicle for them to make more money and leave me heavily out of pocket and no car!

 

Oh and it wouldn't let me change the payment date online either :(

Please help - it's really starting to affect my health :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

let him turn up at your job and film him on your phone

 

then you can goto the FOS/FCA with it all

MB have been castigated and fined so many times by the relevant authorities that I think you'd get a good result out if them.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Please can somebody tell me what to do next?

 

There are no arrears outstanding on the account and despite saying that if the account were brought up to date they would cease recovery , they are now saying they still want to collect the vehicle!

 

Can somebody tell me what I am to do?

 

The complaint has been escalated but they are insisting on still sending agents and are saying I have the vehicle without their consent !

 

Is there anything I can do?

 

Please help ! I really can't afford to lose my car.

Tried to contact courts but nobody willing to give advice!

 

Any good solicitors I can contact?

Thabks

Link to post
Share on other sites

has this been 8 weeks since you first complained?

if so why not give the fos a ring?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its also 8 weeks they have been threatening to recover.....they could have done it by now.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They keep trying.

He came last weekend but nobody was home and the vehicle was not accessible.

 

They are sending another agent now as I complained about the conduct of the previous agent.

 

Should I submit a time order to the court?

I'm not sure what I'm asking extra time for as there are no outstanding payments ... only the recovery agents fees!

 

I'm sat here shaking!

A delivery guy just came to the door and now I'm a nervous wreck !

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unlawful fees

How many times have they now charged this repo fee do you know?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...