Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and thank you for concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MET ANPR PCN - Southgate Park - Stansted


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1200 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Dragonfly1967

My story is similar to this one.

 

I parked in Starbucks very late at night,got out to get a McDonald's,stayed for 5 hours while waiting for a delayed plane.

 

I've been reading through the advice since I got my MET demand a month after I parked at Southgate Stansted. I'm now at the stage where they have sent me letter from debt recovery. They say if i dont reply by the 24th of July they will assume the NTK was the driver.

 

I've ignored everything so far.

 

Should I still ignore debt recovery.

 

Thanks

Edited by DragonFly1967
Split thread, linked back to other thread
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

Good old MET Parking. Never one to disappoint when you're in need of a giggle.

 

Can you have a look at THIS POST please, copy and paste the relevant parts to 'Notepad', fill in your answers and then post it back to this thread :thumb:

 

Also, if you have any of the documentation that's been sent to you so far, please upload it to this thread (after you've removed any personal information, registration numbers, reference numbers, Bar & QR codes). Thanks.

 

As for Desperate Recovery Plus. You can ignore them to your hearts content.

 

They just like to waste paper with idle threats :thumb:

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

follow the advice given to the other posters regarding this site,

get on to Starbucks and get them to tell MET to cancel.

 

Careful how you word your request as you dont want to identify yourself as driver( they have written to you as keeper and dont know who the driver is so dont help them).

 

Only mention MaccyD's if they share the car park and if they do then get on to MaccyD's as well.

 

As your NTK was too late to create a keeper liability

you could let the food companies know that MET arent obeying the law and just trying to rob their customers blind and that you will consider them equally culpable for the parking co's unlawful actions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

I've read the other threads on this subject and have a similar story.

MET contacted me with a reminder notice a month after the event. (£100).

 

There was no ticket on my car.

 

I briefly got out to get a McDonalds.

 

I ate that in the car.

 

I was in the star bucks area but near the burger bar or cabab thing whatever it was.

 

It was late a night I did not see anything about restricted parking.

They have a photo of me entering and one leaving 4hrs later.

 

I'm at the stage where I've now got a letter from a debt recovery company.

 

They say if i dont contact them telling them the name of the driver they will asume the keeper was the driver.

 

Is that lawfull ?

 

I've not appealed to anything yet as people have advised not to.

 

What's you thoughts please.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi , sorry it taken so long to reply. There was no ticket on the car, the first i knew of it was when they sent me a REMINDER parking charge notice on the 5.5.18.

Sorry i cant upload a photo of the parking charge notice.

I wouldn't know where to start with that one.

Thanks for any advice..

 

For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture]

 

please answer the following questions.

 

1 Date of the infringement 31.03.18

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 4.5.18

 

3 Date received 5.5.18

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?] no

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? yes

 

6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up your appeal]

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up no

 

7 Who is the parking company? M.E.T

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] South Gate Park Stansted Airport

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. POPLA

 

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure,

please check HERE

 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here DRP, Zenith collections

 

 

copy the windscreen or ANPR section to your thread and answer the questions...

Link to post
Share on other sites

read upload

it explain how to do it there.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

do they refer to a ticket issued to the driver?

 

probably dont because they use ANPR and cant get the issuing of the NTK right on most occasions. This means there is no keeper liability so don't name the driver and they have no-one to chase.

 

they cant assume anything, the law was made specifically to deal with this and they are trying to pull the wool over your eyes.

 

It also makes a claim for breach of the GDPE/DPA a possibility if you want to go down that road

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

They don't refer to a ticket at all . J

ust a reminder parking charge notice.

 

Reminder of what i said to myself.

That was the first i'd seen of anything.

 

It says on the back of the reminder notice , The registered keeper details were obtained from the DVLA because we have reasonable cause to obtain and use this information in accordance with the data protection act 1998.

 

in order to trace the keeper of the vehicle that has not adhered to the parking terms and conditions. bla bla bla.

 

Im going to hold my nerve and see if a court date comes through.

 

Ill go to court......whatever......

 

Thanks guys..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, we know that they tell lies to the DVLA and you can sue them for that but I would consider that another battle to be fought after this one.

 

What to do?

well ignore them is the best thing to do, they will get some toothless rent a threat to write to you with increasingly scary letters and a supposed bill that goes upwards but as you owe nothing it doesn't matter if the ask for £100 or a million quid, zero is all they are getting.

 

If they do actually threaten court action ( that will be a new one for MET) the you can tell them that they are barking up the wrong tree and will lose their claim as long as you use the correct terminology.

 

Chances are once rumbled they will skulk away but you don't want to be doing this too soon or they will think that you actually care about them

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi. I'm new to this and not sure if i'm posting in the right place.

 

I received a parking notice in the post in February 2018.

The date of the alleged offence was in March 2018 . 

 

I was receiving letters and debt recovery letters but this all went quiet until now.

I recently received a Debt Recovery + letter. 

 

I have thrown away all letters regarding this issue as i thought it was dropped.

Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

should be scanning stuff not ever throwing it away.

 

thats not a letter of claim so safe to ignore..just don't move within 6yrs of the event without informing MET.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...