Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I don't understand the bit about looking after your own being criminal, TJ. Could you expand on that please?
    • A somewhat good result. After more chasing, they've sent me a spreadsheet of the accounts for fire protection, water charges and electric.  Communal Electricity - Estimated £45.00, Actual £241.73 - Revised: £41.63 Communal Water - Estimated £3.66, Actual £234.91 - Revised: £76.96 Fire Protection - Estimated £2.08, Actual £147.65 - Revised: £51.15 Still it seems too high, the total for this estate alone for water charges came to £62,950.07 last year. The thing is, they've listed blocks that don't seem to exist on our estate. Possibly from the new development that has only just been built on the estate, which was finished in the summer this year.     
    • The largest ever amount that went into that account was £500 which was about 7 months before it was blocked.    There was no going forward income as the 1st lockdown came 6 weeks later and I went straight onto universal credit after that and have been on it ever since.    Bottom line, at the time it was the only account I had add and all of my savings of £16500 were in there which I had no access to after it was blocked. Tried to contact the car finance company but no one was available throughout the pandemic likewise many other companies who registered a default
    • so you got the original letter asking for your side of the story and replied by email. post up what you said in your reply by email please and their reply.   you later got a letter stating this will be heard by the simple justice proceedure at xyz court on xyz date but still inviting you comment or plea?   how many time and how many days did you use this for and WHAT EXCATLY (the bit in black) on the letter from the SJP court have you been charged with..??   one specific event on xyz date ,...with other uses being by tickboxes to be taken into consideration and wiped if you agree?   what DATE is the court hearing?
    • A more controversial point is that Johnson has made it illegal to look after your family, requiring you to choose between them.   No one I know doubts or questions that people hosting raves and such like should be prosecuted given the situation, just as those gathering for fox hunts and grouse shoots should be, but effectively making people who are simply trying to safely and sensibly look after their own into criminals while the government pals do whatever they like and are thrown taxpayer money by the BILLION for nothing is obnoxious and abhorrent, especially when you can go to a restaurant or supermarket or transport hub and be in close contact with hundreds of strangers.     Oh look - 6 + 1 in close contact from 14+ households and only one wearing a mask - leading by appallingly bad example.    
  • Our picks

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 863 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

1 Date of the infringement 19th June 2018

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 12th July 2018

 

3 Date received 14th July 2018

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?] N

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes, ANPR capture of rear VRM leaving car park and several CCTV stills of people walking out of the car park

 

6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up your appeal]

No but have one planned,

essentially confirming that without prejudice the keeper has received their NTK,

cannot recall the driver on that day and as there was no NTD left on the windscreen,

 

 

assume they must be relying on S9 POFA to recover their charge from the keeper,

however as they are outside the 14 day requirement within law this is not going to prove successful.

 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N, Will edit when recieved

 

7 Who is the parking company? MET Parking Services

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] (364) Southgate Park, Stansted, CM24 1PY

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA

Met R.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont appeal yet. They havent mentioned Pofa, so theyre already knackered. Let them dig their own grave.

 

Plus its an ANPR capture, meaning theyre already way out of time for it.

 

Sit back, relax, and laugh.

 

Save any appeals or messing around with them, if theyre stupid enough to get a silly rent-a-sol involved.

 

For now, just ignore. Theyve failed on a few things, so its going nowhere

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Halfwits!

 

That should have landed on your doormat on or before 3rd July for there to be any keeper liability. As renegadeimp has suggested, let them waste their money. You've got no worries with this at all.

 

Even their own date that the NtK was generated was 9 days outside the time allowed, so unless they've got access to a DeLorean and some Plutonium... :lol:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was me, id play with them. Ignore totally. If they get a sol involved. Keep ignoring. If they send a claim form in, hit them hard with an easy defence, and claim costs. Cost them a fair bit of cash for no effort at all :)

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess that you are the registered owner and there is no way the NTK was sent elsewhere first- a leasing company for example.

 

Otherwise send a letter to the DVLA asking who asked for your information and when. Then what information did they get from the enquirer about the day the alleged incident occurred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there any point though. Theres absolutely noting the PPC can ever do to the op

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever you want to do our advice is dont contact MET at all.

 

By all means tell Starbucks that MET cant be bothered to obey the law and that you are entitled to hold their masters to account but it would be simpler for Starbucks to tell Met to cancel and that way their name wont get dragged into an unseemly public spat.

 

Dont say you were driving, just say you received this out of time demand for your vehicle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The real me..

 

I've moved your post to your own thread which can be found here >> https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?488684-MET-ANPR-PCN-Southgate-Park-Stansted :thumb:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...