Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you both. My defence was as vague as their Claim. 1. I am the defendant in this claim and litigant in person. All allegations made by the claimant are denied. 2. The defendant does not recognise the alleged agreement xxxxxxxxxxx as mentioned in the particulars of claim therefore it is denied that any such agreement exists. 3. The defendant has requested copies of the alleged agreement under Data Subject Access Request, Consumer Credit act 1974 s.77/8 and Civil Procedure Rules 31.4 but to date the claimant has failed to provide a copy of this document. 4.The defendant has also requested copies of the default and termination notice for the alleged account xxxxxxxxx as required to legally enforce the alleged debt, but again the claimant has failed to provide either. 5. In addition the defendant has requested copies of statements for the alleged account xxxxxxx showing the amount of monies allegedly owed to the claimant. To Date these have not been provided. 6. The defendants view is that this claim is vexatious and an abuse of process as the claimant has failed to provide any documentation to support their claim and respectfully requests that the said claim be struck out.   As an aside, I noticed that the 'statement' they did provide had a different figure on it to what they are claiming, so I will hopefully be able to flesh out quite a bit in my skeleton argument.   Spam 
    • 80% refund sounds like a very good deal* as they are entitled by law to deduct an amount from the refund to reflect the use you have had of the item over the 12 months it has been working.   So you could argue that a deduction of 20% for one year indicates that they expect it to last for at least five years, and probably longer.     * Think about it this way - would you pay 80% of the value of a brand new iPad to buy a second-hand one that somebody else has been using for over a year, or would you expect to get it cheaper than that?
    • Hi WoodDD.. Neither Case was cited in the VSC WS... however, MR D form VCS threw in VCS v Ward & Idle for the Judge to consider during the hearing. The Judge did not have time to review this. I believe he may have had a quick scan but decided it wasn't relevant at the time.. By not relevant, he didn't elaborate if it was not admissible or anything else..   Hope this helps..   Regards Tom     
    • Can I  ask what you mean by "... they recommended a firm... "?   I ask because I'm a bit surprised that Social Services are even allowed to do that.  (I may be mistaken and that this is common practice, but it seems a bit odd to me).   If they did do so and the work has turned out to be sub-standard and unsatisfactory, I would have no hesitation in making a formal complaint to the council and also to my (or your friend's) local councillor(s).  You acted on the council's recommendation and you should have a reasonable expectation that the firm recommended should be reliable and professional.  I would also insist that trading standards be asked to investigate this firm.  (Where I live our local county council trading standards department runs an approved trader database).   A complaint to the council might not directly assist you but it might help to prevent others being taken in by this firm.
    • Hello Susan, welcome to CAG.   Hopefully Paul Walton will see this message and reply to you, but it would also be a good idea to start a new thread of your own so we can advise on anything else connected with your refund.   Best, HB
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Restons/Cabot claimform - old HFC debt step-daughter


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 757 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

My wife has been getting calls and texts from Cabot for weeks telling her to call them about a matter they wish to discuss, but they ask for her grown-up daughter's name. She has happily ignored the calls and texts, nothing to do with her of course.

 

A letter arrived recently advising that Restons were going to make a claim in court for over three and a half thousand pounds, not a trivial amount so they may actually try.

 

BUT, the HFC Bank account was started in 2006 and defaulted soon after when my step-daughter lost her job.

The letter states the account was terminated in January 2008.

 

I think she made some movement to pay via CCCS but that fell through long ago.

As far as she is aware, nothing has been paid on this account for the last 7-8 years and she's not contacted anyone about it in that time.

 

The letter says the debt was assigned to Cabot in October 2017, no mention of where it was up until then.

She does not have any paperwork relating to the account but that's beside the point,

she has had no default notice that she is aware of and does not know when the last payment was made either, it's that long ago.

 

Does she just write to them and say 'statute barred' and see where it goes from there or is there some way she can get the info she needs to prove that?

I don't think she's ever asked for a credit report but the concern is that will just give the DCA her up to date address, phone number and so on.

 

I've read dx100uk 's defence note in https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?477307-Arrow-restons-claimform-old-Vanquis-Card-debt-statute-barred&p=5031789&viewfull=1#post5031789 amongst other threads, got to admit a lot of it goes over my head these days, I'm well out of the loop since I used to be active on here.

 

The letter says she has to pay in full by July 26th 'or else'... They also sent a statement of earnings form.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, should have said it was PAP. Yes, she's got that too. Tick box D and just put SB ? :-)

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are 1000% it is yes

 

get out of the old school habit of hiding from DCA's

if there are other debts then findout who owns them and update them to the current address by sending our SB letter or if not SB'd a simple letter

esp if she gets phishing letters about old debts.

 

they are quite capable now of an DO gett default judgements sent to an old address,, even if the debt is SB'd and the 1st you know are bailiffs at the door!!

 

 

 

moved to HFC forum and retitled

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, she's away this weekend but as soon as she gets back I'll get her to request her credit file. Once we have that we can probably find much of the info needed.

 

Thanks for the guidance

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

wont be on there

as it was defaulted more than 6yrs ago surely?

 

if the lat payment was through CCCS [stepchange now]

cant she ring them and get a statement of affairs or WHY?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can tell I'm out of practise here, but it's her issue not mine so I'll get her to do the legwork.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well don't mess around 2 long you MUST reply to that PAP letter within the 30days deadline

else I bet they'll file a backdoor CCJ to one of her old addresses.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, on with, she is back tomorrow. The only address they have for her is mine, but how they got the wife's mobile number I don't know.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

credit file I expect

or debt details from the OC upon purchase

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The good news is that there is no trace of this on her credit file :-). I don't know which one she used, it was a free one, but her credit score was 925 she says. 'Stirling' stuff :lol:

 

She is going to call Stepchange tomorrow, her day off, as well as checking the credit file fully. I'll help her to tick box D...

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Experian credit report obtained.

No sign of this debt, just one note

"you have no settled non-mail order credit accounts"

but no explanation of what that may be.

I googled, seems that's a false negative and nothing to worry about really.

 

She has a credit score in the mid 900's and can only see her current mobile phone and bank account as active.

 

She has called Stepchange, they could not find anything on their system.

She spent some time giving them her details and cross-checking.

They say if there had been anything they would have removed it after 6 years under data protection.

 

Box D ticked, 'Statute Barred' written in the space, form sent back to Restons :-)

 

Yes, reading what has happened with others they may still try it on, but we're ready for them.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Restons have responded and whinged about not sending them a covering letter to explain why... All she did was tick the D box and write 'statute barred' in the space and sent the form back.

 

They claim that a payment was last made in January 2017, but don't say who by...

 

Personally I suspect this is when Cabot bought it from some other DCA

- Restons say she should provide documentation to support her claim

- how on earth can you send proof of not paying?

 

I am thinking to respond by suggesting they find who paid in January 2017 and ask them to settle the matter.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No dont respond

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
No dont respond

 

Thanks, if they want to try their luck with court then let them pay a fee, then lose :-)

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

And as if by magic, N1 has arrived from Northampton. Issue date 28 Aug, so clock starts ticking Sept 1st ? 5 days (depending how they are counted) to day of service.

 

Pointers please - I'm very rusty :-)

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

title amended - moved to legals

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thanks, very quick response, that's given us something to do today...

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In order for us to help you we require the following information:-

 

Name of the Claimant ? Cabot

 

Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 28 AUG 2018

 

Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 14th Sept (Sat) + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total) - 28 Sept

 

^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please type out their particulars of claim in full (verbatim) less any identifiable data and round the amounts up/down.

The Claimant claims payment of the overdue balance due from the Defendant(s) under a contract between the Defendants(s) and Hfc Bank Plc dated on or about May 04 2006 and assigned to the Claimant on Oct 05 2017

Particulars a/c no xxxxxxxx

DATE ITEM VALUE

22/06/2018 Default Balance 3676.xx

Post Refl Cr NIL

TOTAL 3676.xx

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? YES

 

What is the total value of the claim? 3941 (incl court & legal rep fees)

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Loan

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? May 2006

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? NO

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? NO

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? NO

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? NO

 

Why did you cease payments? Unemployment

 

What was the date of your last payment? perhaps 2009 via CCCS

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Not that I'm aware of

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management planicon? Used CCCS for a while but eased around 2009, unsure. CCCS (Stepchange) have no record now, they say it must be more than 6 years

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

re. CPR 31.14 Request - no documents are mentioned in the claim so skip this step ? Sending CCA request later today when postal order has been obtained.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assignment and default are mentioned within the particulars...but as the debt is statue barred its your choice if you wish to utilise the CPR 31.14.

 

Section 77 request for loans.

 

Statute barred defence....(must be submitted by Friday 28th Sept 4.00pm)

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).

 

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980. If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.

 

3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £(insert amount claimed) or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

In a previous letter, Reston's claim the last payment was made on 30 January 2017 yet the loan termination date was 31 January 2008. Do we need to request details of that alleged payment? Step-daughter is positive she didn't pay anything after her dealings with CCCS were dropped in 2009.

Do we need to mention and refute that in the response to court as Reston's are using that as their reason to claim against this being statute barred ?

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you need to be positive before submitting a statute barred defence......you cant amend it after.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
Well you need to be positive before submitting a statute barred defence......you cant amend it after.

 

That's why I was asking. She didn't make any such payment and I don't want to miss an important point in making the defence.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...