Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi.   Advising by PM is against forum rules. It's stops us being a resource for people to use in the future and also prevents advice from being peer-reviewed. Please keep advice on this thread.   HB
    • Oh. I don't understand the indemnity. If it was a business expense that has come back and it was an expense last year than it needs to be entered in back on the income side.
    • Don't see a major issue with any of that.   1 IT equipment upto £2k is normally ok.   2 daughters cost, provided it has been transferred then no problem. Mp's do it all the time and it's below the ni and tax thresholds.    Depending on the business£18k does not sound unreasonable.   I've spent the last thirty years doing my own tax returns.   Get in touch if you are stuck, if I can help I will. - not sure if that breaks forum rules. Sorry if it does.
    • I'm not sure that the person I spoke to at SLC was correct regarding the last deferment being 2011. I can see further payments.   I think I can see payments following on from that - I continued to pay what I thought was SLC company until 2015.   This I now think was Honours SLC, not SLC or Erudio.  Now I understand my 1st 1998 loan was transferred to Honours yet the other three were with SLC.    I know 100% I negotiated a deal with a DCA  to clear loan outstanding.     I've been searching old documents today, contacted Honours Student Loans to find proof of the payment to close the loan.     Someone from Link Financial called me back straightaway,  - so I'm now really worried I've opened a whole new can of worms.   They were really pushy for my info... I did not give them anything although now worryingly they have my number. Can they even try and go back on this...?    The only payment I can see to ever to Erudio was end of March 2014, under ESL limited.. which was taken without my knowledge using SLC  DD details.    I remember thinking it was a scam - so contacted my bank but I had noticed it after the payment had gone out.   I think by the time I had seen it the Bank  couldn't reverse it but all further payments were stopped, and I remember the bank even being really confused and saying it should not have happened.    I must have made contact with Erudio at this point - but there is nothing on their account files. There are notes - saying "surpress DAF request."     Erudio ( accoording to their own SAR)   sent a  Notice of Assignment had been sent the previous Autumn to my old address, which I never saw or received.    I'm looking at my address history and I was really conscientious with informing SLC - there is even a note 2 days after we moved house in 2013 and also when I changed my name to get married.   I'm adamant the Notice of Assignment was either not sent or sent to an old property, I also can't see why I would have made contact with SLC a few days after we bought a new house in 2013 - if it was not to inform them I had moved?       
    • Oh, and as it’s a pre-1985 agreement do they still have to provide a true copy of the CCA? It seems they are trying to use Regulation 9 of the CNC Regulations (which I haven’t heard of!) as a “get out of jail free” card.
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

Car SORN awaiting V5 to dispose off council threatening to remove


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 922 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Ok I'll try to keep this short

 

 

Bought a car, broke down still awaiting the V5 and fully intend to scrap the car but will also remove some parts from it before it goes. In the meantime the car is whole and in tact and looks in roadworthy condition with MOT.

 

 

 

The car is parked on social housing landlord car park and is SORN'd, untaxed but does have current MOT. Have had issues with neighbours and ASB for which I involved the police. They have moaned at the landlord saying the car is "abandoned" to get at me.

 

 

The council came out and put a notice on the car last week:

 

 

Polite Notice

Refuse Disposal Amenity Act 1978 (as amended by clean neighbourhoods and environment act 2005)

Road Traffic the removal and disposal of vehicles and regulations 1984

 

 

Reg*********

Make xxxxxx

 

Model xxxxxxxxxxx

 

Colour xxxxxxxxx

 

Location xxxxxxxxxx

 

 

 

Vehicle reported as abandoned, if you have information relating to this vehicle or are the owner/keeper please contact the environmental protection team at xxxx if no information is received by x July the vehicle may be removed and destroyed

-------------------------------

 

 

That is complete there's no date or other details on the notice.

 

 

 

I emailed them immediately telling them the car isn't abandoned at all and up until today I hadn't heard anything from them. I have emailed them chasing up a reply and just got a curt email from someone with no job title saying contact the landowner yet it wasn't the landowner that put the notice on the car that was the council.

 

 

I have no intention of leaving the car there any length of time, i've submitted a V62 to the DVLA to get the V5 as I haven't had one for the car yet and once I have it i'll get a scrappy to collect it. Unfortunately I hadn't acted as quickly as I could've done due to disabilities and ill health.

 

 

So what's the legalities with removing the car in this way how much time do I have? The car is MOT'd until September but is SORN at present and quite happy to get the car gone as soon as I have the paperwork to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its on private property

The council cant touch it without the landowners permission

Have you told the landowner this?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Social housing car park IS NOT private property.

Its akin to sorn-ing your car and parking it on Tesco's.

Park it on your drive.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Social housing car park IS NOT private property.

Its akin to sorn-ing your car and parking it on Tesco's.

Park it on your drive.

 

 

If I had a drive it'd be on it we don't even have a road let alone a driveway. Did I mention it broke down, can't remember if I did now or not but either way I can't move it myself. I will scrap it but the local company wants a V5 (not unreasonably) to collect it and it hasn't turned up yet. I've now done a V62 to request one but obviously this takes time hence the question.

 

The note was banging on about it being abandoned that's all it is talking about nothing else and as I have told them it is not abandoned this notice says nothing about SORN nor tax etc it just literally says it's abandoned and for which I was asking advice especially as it's undated too.

 

 

I have since had an email from someone with no job title just a name saying contact the landowner despite the fact it wasn't the landowner that put the notice on the car

Link to post
Share on other sites

The council cannot take it without the land owners [even if a general one beforehand] permission

 

Same goes for tescos bushy..its private land.

No one even the council can rockup and take it without permission

 

Simply tell the council its not dumped...rich44

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx100uk

 

 

So that's all I have to do in relation to the notice? I told them immediately that the vehicle is not abandoned it's parked awaiting the V5 so it can be scrapped and i've emailed the landowner to tell them the same. Hopefully the DVLA will respond quickly to the V62 and can get this gone.

 

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quickie, got the car without a v5c. How long ago did you apply via v62 to get it?

As they write to Las known keeper and give 28 days to have them reply.

Grace period of 5 working days either side so it could be up to 38 days before they will process a v5c to you

 

Or was it a lost v5c?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, it was last week I sent it off. I suppose I might get lucky and one of the other scrappies I have contacted might take it without the full V5C

Link to post
Share on other sites

same as private parking bushy else councils would do the parking ..its private land regardless

… if notified they cant take it

I think someones being a bit nasty here..

 

other option is let them take

why do you need to use the scrapper rich?

they wont pay you anything for it I bet...same outcome:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

there may be somehting in your tenancy about this but if there isnt then the council will have to rely on s99 of the 1984 Road traffic regulation act that gives them powers to remove ABANDONED vehicle from private land if certain criteria are met.

 

so for example, is it in a condition that may cause danger to someone?

The council has to serve papers in a certain way and without a V5 to show you are keeper you may well be clobbered by the 15 days notice period.

 

it makes me wonder what circumstances the council believe give them cause to think it is abandoned as they will have to show why they thiink that is so and just someone reporting it isnt enough. imagine all those classic car restorers having their garages raided just because their pride and joy is in bits

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...