Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sons car clamped by marston for previous owners PCN Fine


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2123 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

There are number of potential problems here. Goods become 'bound' under the terms of the warrant from the date of the Notice of Enforcement. What this means is that (depending upon the date of the warrant/NoE), the previous owner would have been prohibited from selling or disposing of his vehicle to your son.

 

Secondly, there appears to be a warrant against your son in relation to a previous road traffic penalty involving your son's previous vehicle (which has been sold).

 

 

My son bought this car from his aunt before getting a quote for insurance. Once he had paid her he found the insurance too expensive and put it up for sale. The man who bought it from him got the ticket - we live in Kent this ticket was incurred AFTER the sale and in Central London where my son has no business in going.

 

I have to be honest here and say that this entire matter is extremely confusing. As I outlined in my answer, there are two separate debts here and for two separate vehicles.

 

The car that has been clamped was only purchased by your son 3 weeks ago. It was detected by way of the enforcement agents ANPR system. Almost certainly, the penalty charge notice (and the responsibility for paying it) would be against the previous owner. It would therefore be for the previous owner to file an Out of Time witness statement and not your son.

 

Question: Has your son contacted the previous owner to inform him that the vehicle that he purchased from him has ben seized in relation to a road traffic contravention?

 

Despite the V5C being in your son's name, the enforcement agent has stated that he is leaving the car clamped in relation to ANOTHER debt that he has on his system:

 

This parking debt is in relation to a car that he sold two years ago. As you have now explained, that particular car was one that he had purchased from his aunt. He kept the car for a very short period of time because the insurance was too expensive. Given the date of the parking contravention, your son is able to ascertain that the person he sold the vehicle to must have committed the contravention.

 

In relation to this 2nd vehicle, did your son ever register it in his name with DVLA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely give Marstons Enforcement Agent (EA) notice that unless the clamp is removed within say 24 hours, the local Police will be notified that the clamp will be cut off, as the EA has not provided evidence to support there being a liability owed by your Son, so he has a chance of applying to the court. Explain to the Police what has happened to date, to justify this approach.

 

By the sound of it, the EA is not going to have the car removed and sold, as the value of the car is not high enough to make it worthwhile. The clamp is being left on in the hope the amount requested will be paid.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely give Marstons Enforcement Agent (EA) notice that unless the clamp is removed within say 24 hours, the local Police will be notified that the clamp will be cut off, as the EA has not provided evidence to support there being a liability owed by your Son, so he has a chance of applying to the court.

 

I am being deadly serious. Removing the clamp will get the son (or the father) into a great deal of trouble:On Friday, I was assisting a lad who had done the same. What happened to him was truly awful:

 

His car was clamped on Monday. A 'friend' removed the clamp and the car hidden away. On Wednesday, the young lad was driving the car on the M25 and unbeknown to him, he was being followed by 2 unmarked police vehicles. After passing a junction, another unmarked car and 6 police cars joined the motorway. He was forced to get out of the car and lay on the motorway while he and his car were searched. While this was happening, 2 lanes on the M25 were closed. He was arrested with 'theft of the vehicle' and taken to the Police station. He was kept in cells on Wednesday night and driven straight to court on Thursday morning and put before the magistrates.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am being deadly serious. Removing the clamp will get the son (or the father) into a great deal of trouble:On Friday, I was assisting a lad who had done the same. What happened to him was truly awful:

 

His car was clamped on Monday. A 'friend' removed the clamp and the car hidden away. On Wednesday, the young lad was driving the car on the M25 and unbeknown to him, he was being followed by 2 unmarked police vehicles. After passing a junction, another unmarked car and 6 police cars joined the motorway. He was forced to get out of the car and lay on the motorway while he and his car were searched. While this was happening, 2 lanes on the M25 were closed. He was arrested with 'theft of the vehicle' and taken to the Police station. He was kept in cells on Wednesday night and driven straight to court on Thursday morning and put before the magistrates.

 

I see this all the time but people will still believe that as long as they "think" what has been done was done wrong, they have the right to cut the clamp off. They don't and it leads, in most circumstances, to serious repercussions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am being deadly serious. Removing the clamp will get the son (or the father) into a great deal of trouble:On Friday, I was assisting a lad who had done the same. What happened to him was truly awful:

 

His car was clamped on Monday. A 'friend' removed the clamp and the car hidden away. On Wednesday, the young lad was driving the car on the M25 and unbeknown to him, he was being followed by 2 unmarked police vehicles. After passing a junction, another unmarked car and 6 police cars joined the motorway. He was forced to get out of the car and lay on the motorway while he and his car were searched. While this was happening, 2 lanes on the M25 were closed. He was arrested with 'theft of the vehicle' and taken to the Police station. He was kept in cells on Wednesday night and driven straight to court on Thursday morning and put before the magistrates.

 

Which is why you notify Police of the issue to see if the issue can be resolved, without leading to this type of situation.

 

Some people don't have the money to pay the EA company and then go through process to reclaim afterwards. The situation has to be resolved, as the clamp cannot just be allowed to stay on, while the EA avoids providing the information, so a court application can be made.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bailiff has finally given us the details this morning!! A whole week of asking him, what a bully he is. It is for London Congestion Charge. The car was registered to my son for the 10 or so days he owned it. He is ringing TFL today AND DVLA to ask for a copy of the slip sent to confirm he sold the vehicle. In the meantime I am going to file an out of time so that the ticket can be re-issued and hopefully get this removed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He is ringing TFL today AND DVLA to ask for a copy of the slip sent to confirm he sold the vehicle. In the meantime I am going to file an out of time so that the ticket can be re-issued and hopefully get this removed.

 

You will need forms PE2 and PE3. You will need the information about the sale for the statutory declaration. The penalty charge will only be re-issued if the application is accepted. You need to be very careful when drafting the forms as they are County Court procedures.

 

Does your son not have any details himself about the date of sale? Was it advertised for sale?

 

PS: Your son will need to take the completed PE2 and PE3 to either his local County Court or solicitor to have his signature witnessed. The court will not charge a fee. A solicitor will charge a fee of £5.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thank you that is great. He advertised it on Gumtree I think I will check with him. I have completed these before so should be OK.

 

My son has looked for the details (it was back in February 2017), he has an ABI which confuses things even more - he cannot find them and has moved back home in that time as well just to complicate matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just contacted Northampton County Court and the Bailiff has given us the wrong details for the PCN. I am really on the point of losing it - he it taking total advantage now. It should be two letters followed by 7/8 numbers he has only given us 6701645. No use to man nor beast and leaves us without a car for another few days!! There must be a governing body that oversees Bailiffs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why were you contacting the Traffic Enforcement Centre?

 

The PCN number can easily be obtained by calling TFL. As the debt is for congestion charging, the first two digits should be TZ followed by 8 numbers. TfL are by far the best local authority and should be able to assist you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I rang them regarding the out of time application. The Bailiff has finally given us the details now - we have also emailed DVLA regarding a duplicate acknowledgement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...