Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wetcloths chasing sky tv debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5433 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just started with my case, is about sky.

One day I cancelled sky talk. It was 2nd of november 2008. So I thought that im with BT and I used phone like everyday .After time on my line appeard information that cannot make calls because I didnt pay ma bill.

It was surprise.So I rang to sky and lady informed me that they reinstall sky talk .Is it normal in UK (by the way Im from Poland , Can they reinstall service without my knowledge ? ) .And after time I received a letter from Wescot credit service about my bill .I will not pay , of course .I informed Wescot credit that I cancelled Sky talk service on 2nd of Nov 2008 and they answered me that they still want money . Can someone tell me how it works in this country ?

Edited by 42man
commercial links..
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just started with my case, is about sky.

One day I cancelled sky talk. It was 2nd of november 2008. So I thought that im with BT and I used phone like everyday .After time on my line appeard information that cannot make calls because I didnt pay ma bill.

It was surprise.So I rang to sky and lady informed me that they reinstall sky talk .Is it normal in UK (by the way Im from Poland , Can they reinstall service without my knowledge ? ) .And after time I received a letter from Wescot credit service about my bill .I will not pay , of course .I informed Wescot credit that I cancelled Sky talk service on 2nd of Nov 2008 and they answered me that they still want money . Can someone tell me how it works in this country ?

Edited by 42man
Commercial links removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke with BT after ,( by the way I was and Im BT customer since 2007 )

So when I ordered Sky TV I didnt realize that I will have to many problems.

I informed Bt that I have been told that they have to take over my calls .

More than 10 times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have confirmation from BT ( I spoke with them today ) that It is not needed to ring them and say that they have to take over the calls.

Bottom line is When I cancelled sky talk - It means it Is cancelled .and contract must be terminated staightaway.

Edited by 42man
Edited commercial links...
Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to establish what type of relationship you have with Sky Talk. (1) Where they are the call provider - in which case, BT is still required to provide the line and TWO bills mst be paid, one to BT and the other to Sky for calls. (2) Where Sky take over the installation, and you receive only 1 bill for calls and line renal (from Sky).

 

I'm describing the latter. If you have the first option, then you are correct that you can tell Sky you no longer wish to use their services, and the calls will revert to BT. However, it is often useful to check with BT that this has been done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All is ok , but what if Company ( whatever we called them ) asking about your money when information provided is based on crime ?

Crime means - information provided is diffrent than true , and is believed that they know about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...