Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

OPS/Gladstones ANPR PCN Claimform - Broadwater Street West in Worthing, West Sussex


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1247 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

has post 17 att got your name showing?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

They hope you can resolve this without them reviewing your liability?

 

Well, if you dont have one how can they review it and if you had one would their review suddenly decide that their clients clients are in fact a bunch of fools and now you dont have have a liability.

 

No wonder the author doesnt put their actual name to this, I wouldnt either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It's up to you, but if you send email you give them a free way to hassle you. In my opinion, it's better to send a letter and make them spend their money to reply and/or hassle you further :thumb:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Good morning CAG

 

More than a year after last hearing from them, ONE PARKING SOLUTIONS are trying it on again.

A few weeks ago I received a letter demanding payment of over £100 for the parking charge that with your excellent help and advice they appeared to have retreated back into their miserable hole of a life. 

 

They are now using a different form of solicitors, Gladstones, and I have just woken up to a letter from the County Court Business Centre demanding £255 including court fees and legal representative costs.

 

Can you help me again please?

Almost to the day I opened the solicitors' letter my life has been turned upside down by my mother being diagnosed with cancer.

The last 3 weeks have been very difficult and I haven't been able to bring myself to fight these disgusting people again.

 

The original thread has been locked as it is so old.

I have (hopefully) included a link to it below. 

Can you re-open it please?

 

Original One Parking Solutions thread

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you HoneyBee13.

 

I really appreciate your help.

I realise it's important to leave emotions out of this but it really is very upsetting.

Looking at those questions now.

 

For anyone reading the original posts: 

the parking spaces that were blocked with wooden pallets and notices saying it was illegal to park there as it contravened Fire Regulations (for fire/emergency access).

There has clearly been a lot of work down to make the parking spaces comply - it's that obvious!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

It must be difficult with emotions running high over your mother, I understand that. Please try not to take this personally, it's one of the companies that wants to make money from people not knowing the rules that apply.

 

That's what we're here for and people should be along to advise later.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In order for us to help you we require the following information:- 

 

Name of the Claimant ONE PARKING SOLUTION LTD

 

Claimants Solicitors Gladstones

 

Date of Issue  -  6th DECEMBER 2019

 

=> Time line (without taking Christmas into account)

 

     Acknowledge by  24th December 2019

 

     Submit Defence by 7th January 2020

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

 

1.The driver of the vehicle with registration xxxxxxxx (the 'Vehicle') parked in breach of the terms of parking stipulated on the signage (the 'Contract') at Broadwater Street West P&D Worthing BN14 9DE, on 04/05/2018 thus incurring the parking charge (the 'PCN').

 

2.The PCN was not paid within 28 days of issue. The Claimant claims the unpaid PCN from the Defendant as the driver/keeper of the Vehicle.

 

3.Despite demands being made, the Defendant has failed to settle their outstanding liability.

 

4,THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS £100 for the PCN, £60 contractual costs pursuant to the contract and PCN terms and conditions, together with statutory interest of £19.00 pursuant to s69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at 8.00% per annum, continuing at £0.04 per day.

 

 

What is the value of the claim?

 

Amount Claimed                         179.27

Court Fee                                       25.00

Legal Representative's Costs     50.00

_______________________________________

Total Amount                             £254.27

_______________________________________

 

Has the claim been issued by the Private parking Company or was the PCN assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim ? OPS

 

I don't know as I can't find the letter from Gladstones. Do they purchase debt?

 

Looking for that letter now. Will update this post/thread when I do.

 

 

Thank you!!!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You MUST acknowledge the claim within 14 days or you lose by default. If that means sending the form back with just the box ticked saying you are defending in full and say in the space that it is denied that a contract was ever offered by the claimant so there can be no breach of contract  and so no cause for action against the defendant.

 

Also Gladstones must have written to you recently with a letter before action or claim so did you get that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KaBoom!!! said:

Thank you HoneyBee. So to them it's just business. Exploiting people's fear of the courts. Nice people hey?

 

If I tell you most of them are ex-clampers, does that explain their outlook?

 

As ericsbrother [EB] says, don't lose sight of your defence deadline even if they aren't doing things on time.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks HB and EB. Wasn't thinking about the reg as identifying myself - doh! 

 

Still looking for the letter from Gladstones - I have time at the moment to deal with this - do I need info from that letter to acknowledge the claim? Reading the rest of the post HB linked to over a nice cuppa now 😉 

Edited by KaBoom!!!
Link to post
Share on other sites

If claimform is from Northampton, can be  done online on MCOL.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, KaBoom!!! said:

Thanks HB and EB. Wasn't thinking about the reg as identifying myself - doh! 

 

Still looking for the letter from Gladstones - I have time at the moment to deal with this - do I need info from that letter to acknowledge the claim? Reading the rest of the post HB linked to over a nice cuppa now 😉 

 

No, if they didnt send one or the lba doesnt contain certain info then you can use this to rubbish them later on and that may help them to decide to drop the matter as Gladdys have a special deal with teh aprking co's that is a bit like no win no fee so they need to keep costs down and claims artificially high to make any money for themselves.

 

Anything that can reduce the payout to their client comes out of their pockets as well

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I have found the letter from Gladstones: it was a Letter Before Claim and they are acting on behalf of their Client, One Parking Solution Ltd. (Can a site admin update my post above for completeness please?)

 

What info should Gladstones have provided?

 

The Claim Form references the County Court Business Centre in Northampton and says I can respond using www.moneyclaim.gov.uk .

 

 

Edited by KaBoom!!!
Extra info
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to OPS/Gladstones ANPR PCN Claimform - Broadwater Street West in Worthing, West Sussex

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked.
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.

 get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]

no need to sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, KaBoom!!! said:

Hi Rage. I'm sorry you're going through the same nonsense with One Parking Solution. The good thing is that you've found Consumer Action Group - they really know their stuff and the games these people play. Even better, the guidance they give you isn't complicated or time consuming for cases like ours. It's been successful - so far 😉 - and even better helps control the rage :-) Have fun kicking their butt!!

 

Best of Luck Kaboom!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

start off with 

1 The Notice to keepr was not compliant with the POFA so no liability whatsoever  has been created so there is no cause for action against the defendant in any capacity

2 there was no parking event so no contract entered into and thus no breach of contract

3 the land the vehicle was photographed on is maintained as a public highway and the claimant has no locus standi.

 

Now for the last point you need to read Dawood v Camden decision and understand its implications. No need to go into detail at this point, you can expand when it comes to writing a witness statement. these points can be considered as stand alone or together to make a more complete argument but for the moment let them worry about that.

send copy to court and to their lawyers if using paper, just online if using MCOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ericsbrother. Thank you for your help again.

 

Are points 1 to 3 specific to my case or generic? I've come back to this after a typically stressful Christmas break and finding it difficult to get up to speed. Can I use the CPR 31:14 "template" in the CPR 31.14 "Request to use on receipt of a PPC ( Private Land Parking Court Claim)" thread?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...