Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for that i thought id just ask as i was unsure.  Just hope its returned to me and doesnt spend the rest of its life going back and forth to Singapore  
    • Thanks @lolerz. I've attached it to the post. What do you think? What's the organ grinder? NTK.pdf
    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lowell backdoor Cat debt CCJ - now court bailiffs?, how much will this harm my future?


tom100
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2130 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The Judgment only shows on your file for 6 yearsicon then falls off...no trace.

 

This is true but as the op has stated they are seriously looking for a career in the civil service or the police it must be declared as its exempt.

A ccj can stop you getting into the police, depends on vetting levels for other civil service jobs.

If the ccj is unsatisfied it will stop you passing vetting for certain exempt positions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If the ccj is unsatisfied it will stop you passing vetting for certain exempt positions.

 

In the civil service, or in general?

 

I have 1 more day to pay this off within the time allowed to get it removed....

 

I am seriously tempted to try and get a loan so I can pay this CCJ off, but due to other defaults (many), my poor credit file, and now the CCJ is on there....its impossible to find anywhere I will get accepted.

 

Getting the money from friends/family even temporarily is not an option

 

Arrrrrgh i feel like my life is ruined because of this thing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mainly civil service.

Unsatisfied ccj in the police.. Fail vetting, shows no integrity and possible money troubles, could lead to corruption. Same for prison service, any job that requires security clearance.. Forget it.

 

In private company's, unless it connects to the civil service contracts, like private prison custodial officer (g4s, sodexo, Serco ) then it falls off after 6 years.

In short if the job is exempt then more than likely not, if not exempt then 6 years as they have no cause or right to look back further

 

Dont get me wrong its only defaulted or unsatisfied ccj's that could affect certain careers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn, this is worse than I first thought!

 

I just looked at the Greater Manchester Police website for example and their vetting procedure, and even people with unsettled defaults they would ask for the defaults to be settled before they considered employing.

 

But let me get one thing straight sgtbush, sorry but its been a long day and I just want to make sure i fully understand what you are saying....

 

If my CCJ is going to prevent me from certain jobs and ruin my life for the next 6 years, that is one thing.....

 

But are you telling me that even after 6 years and the CCJ 'dissapears', it could still come back to haunt me? For something like a diplomacy role in the Foreign&Commonwealth office, or any government job? Obviously this will be deep vetting procedure. Are you saying they will be able to see I once had a CCJ and thats it, forever? Surely not?

 

I might aswell have a criminal record then? :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jesus, I can't believe this. I will have the same chance as a released rapist/murderer of getting certain jobs? (inc one i want) just for a bloody CCJ?

 

Do you happen to have a list of exempt jobs?

I couldn't find when I searched just now.

It all just comes up with different criminal offences, and I thought CCJ was a civil matter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I dont have a list.

As I said It would come under queston. There are no hard or fast rules.

All I can Say is I've gone thru vetting, I'm CTC and DV cleared and I've seen people fail on the simplist of things.

I've also seen people pass with things.

 

Look at it this way.

 

A job advertised that is exempt under ROOA 1974

You have two peoples cv on your desk.

Both have pretty identical qualifications.

One has a satisfied non defaulted ccj

One has a defaulted non satisfied ccj.

Its imperative to the job for full vetting to take place

 

Who gets the job???

 

The answer does actually delve deeper like reasons, how old, what type, how much, was it declared or not but I'm trying to put it in the simplist form

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou sgtbush, as much as the realisation of your posts are making me depressed I suppose it's better to face reality now than to live in dreamworld.

 

I'm just looking at a developed vetting questionare and searched for the financial bits;

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/developed-vetting-questionnaire-nsv002

 

As my CCJ is "only" for £350ish, it will be satisfied within the next year or so i imagine, but it will also be a defaulted ccj as i cant afford the £50 set by the court, and have agreed to pay original creditor a token payment until i get myself sorted.

 

Obviously in any case I would need to get myself completely out of the woods in all departments (defaults, late payments) it seems and build up a sound financial background. maybe having a bit of savings would prove i've "changed" too?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just run with it.

Pay it as soon as possible.

I'm not saying it will be a problem in the future, just possibly.

Its only £350, not the national debt.

 

If you went thru vetting you would be able to either explain it or appeal a decision .

 

The fact your here, asking advice and your bothered about it shows integrity.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not saying it will be a problem in the future, just possibly.

 

Thanks, I appreciate that

Tbh glancing at the form it didn't fill me with confidence even excluding the CCJ factor? "Have you ever been in financial difficulty? If yes explain below and include dates" - my financial history is a complete mess. Defaults, missed payments, (probably 8-10 different accounts).

 

Even if i use the next 6 years to get myself in order, my financial past is likely to come back to haunt me i suspect.

 

Ironically my brother is the same as you, CTC and DV cleared....i'm not sure i'll ever be able to say the same

 

Long story short.....I'd have absoloutely no chance of DV clearance right now and there would be huge doubt in 6 years time too?

Link to post
Share on other sites

who got the CCJ over what?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this the same CCJ?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this the same CCJ?

 

dx

 

Yes, the same one as this; https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?487902-What-is-the-worst-a-bailiff-can-do-re-unpayable-CCJ

 

I don't dispute the debt it's all perfectly fine, I simply hadnt been at my parents address for a few months when all this happened. If I'd have seen the letters in time and made a plan this could have been avoided. Just incredibly bad luck for me

Link to post
Share on other sites

better in one thread

I've merged them and retitled it to encompass both questions..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so an old cat debt...

 

why cant you set this aside and stop this in its track?

did you not inform the OC or the DCA you'd moved?

 

we need a reason to set aside and a reason to defence the org debt.

 

did you ring northants bulk and get a copy of the Claimform and the Judgement?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant set aside for many reasons.

(1) the first payment of £50 is due tomorrow. its been nearly a month since judgement

(2) i cant afford the court fee to do this, and to get help you need to be on benefits

 

No I hadnt informed them I had moved....its complex because its temporary moving whilst at uni.

 

I have the claimform and judgment because i popped back to parents house and saw it

Link to post
Share on other sites

so in a way you did get it.

rock and a hard place.

 

might be better to just follow andy's thought in post 2

 

pers i'd spend the £50 you have to pay anyway on getting a N245 running

get it set to a lower figure PCM and deal with p'haps a set aside [though I can see no real reason to do so] later?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

" As my CCJ is "only" for £350ish, it will be satisfied within the next year or so i imagine, but it will also be a defaulted ccj as i cant afford the £50 set by the court, and have agreed to pay original creditor a token payment until i get myself sorted."

 

Think your a little confused.....you cant have a defaulted CCJ...you can have a default CCJ...because you didnt defend it.....your not defaulting because your not meeting the payment set by the order..you have agreed a payment plan with the judgment creditor..they have accepted..they set the £50 initially..the court just typed it out....they therefore have rescinded and set it to your requested affordable payment.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

On my credit file it will make no reference to the £50 I am supposedly supposed to pay each months and the "missed" payments?

 

I think when people hear of CCJs they panic because they think the courts are actively pursuing them automatically? I know I certainly did.

Where as in reality, it is entirely the discretion of the judgment creditor right?

 

If they wanted to enforce the debt they could pay the court fee and do it.

If they couldnt be bothered to do anything and let the debt go, they could do that.

The court doesn't really give a toss, unless their getting paid for enforcement?

Am I right?

Edited by dx100uk
Quote
Link to post
Share on other sites

you thought they might send bailiffs

they haven't yet?

 

the CCj is there already unless you pay it in full in [28 days] [today was it?]

it will remain there for 6yrs regardless to if you pay it or not.

a satisfied CCJ is just as damaging and a non satisfied one.

 

the only way to remove it would be to set it aside

I cant see a viable reason to do that

you got the claimform

you didn't respond.

and I cant see a defence for the debt anyway.

paperwork issues don't matter now.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I didn't get the claimform in time because I'd been away from parents house for several months whilst at Uni but from my research apaprently this on its own is not a good enough defence to get it set aside.

 

How about if the original creditor agree not to get in the way of a set it aside claim? maybe if i offer full payment and a bit more for their trouble once im in position to do so? will this make any difference or are they not even present at the hearing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Digressing a little, why don't you want to claim JSA? You could post on our benefits forum for further advice.

 

HB

 

Full-time students are generally not able to claim JSA - even during the Summer vacation periods. There are a few exceptions, which include:

 

-If you are a lone parent

-A member of a couple with a child where both of you are full-time students and you claim during your summer holidays.

- If you are attending a DWP related course or scheme for a limited period (seek specialist advice in this case)

 

You can also claim if you've taken time out from university for poor health or caring responsibilities, and you're waiting to re-join the course

 

OP - Have you contacted your institution to see if there is a hardship fund or Summer Vacation fund that you might be able to seek support from?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot Andy

The creditor is Lowell I know they have a bad reputation but it seemed like the woman on the phone was really genuine, but doesnt mean to say she doesnt have more unforgiving superiors.

 

Yes she said I'll be getting payment plan through the post. I really doubt its going to explicitly state "if you continue this payment plan, we won't enforce the debt" as it would mean I could take over 10 years paying it off haha, hardly worth it for them when they have the CCJ?

 

 

So £25 to apply for the CCJ, and £77 to enforce it? Thats almost certainly more than they paid for the debt isn't it?

 

They only seem genuine because they are on commission and getting payment is there main game ! I can understand you feel overwherlmed at the moment but please listen to the great advice on here and also don't take the DCA at face value no matter what they tell you.

DCA's will stitch you up to suit themselves. Once you start to take control they they tend to back off quickly. Personally I would be making sure all correspondence is in writing !

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

(2) i cant afford the court fee to do this, and to get help you need to be on benefits

 

 

 

 

 

There is more to being able to claim Fee Remission than on being on Benefits. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/apply-for-help-with-court-and-tribunal-fees Follow the instructions at the end of Q9 on the Form.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...