Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for all of your consideration and time on my case The revised letter is fine and approved at this stage. As far as I kno neither the toilet or basin were replaced, the holw referred to by the calimant was an access point to a stop tap that couldnt be moved due to the location at below floor level in the garage A few minutes ago i gothome to a posted hard copy of the claim the original respond date was 4pm 9thJuly  In the same post delivery I recieved a further letter showing an additional 14 days for response to 4pm 23rd July I altered my copy of the claim form posted  earlier so that we were all ware of the revised date Spoke to my electrician earlier and she is considerring whether to put it in writing in a statement of truth She doesnt like confrontation and may not.  Follows from email 20th may   The door frames, where it’s all not fitting correctly with gaps and warped timber used.  A relatively simple fix  £25 . Skirting boards on the curved parts where it’s been filled with a filla and not even been smoothed out.  as above £25 . The architrave isn’t joining correctly with one piece with a cutting taken out of it. ive not seen this so cant comment but a simple fix . Sliding door, no stopper was used to stop it going all the way back and isn’t aligned to the floor. a door stopper was fitted The door slides fully into the pocket to maximise a very tight access witha 2ft 3" door . The extractor going into the boiler where a round tubes been used to an oblong pipe. It’s also held on by gaffer tape.   not a good standard and an easy fix £25 . The window hasn’t been packed correctly and one opening window isn’t aligned. an easy fix it took 1 minutes on my return from holiday . One piece of flooring isn’t sitting flush so will damage very quickly. I hadnt seen this,  the flooring supplied by the c,aimant was apoor quality Bnq with click systme that didnt lock weel so a boad may have risen up again an easy fix to replace one board £25 The toilet is far too close to the radiator and you can’t get up if sitting down. The defendant showed the claimant the size of the room right at the beginning and had discussions about it being a tight space I supplied a short reach pan to maximise space. Difficult to change probable cost £2-300 or more dependong on the final position . The stop tap I cannot get my hand in to be able switch the tap off.  I cut  a hole in the bottom of the basin vanity unit I wsnt particulalry pretty but I have large hands and could turn off the stop top it was below floor level as mentioned earlier  £25 to make hole even bigger . The window you are aware of that’s cracked and you are replacing.  this was carried out by the defendant, appointment on 10th June on return from holiday    The claimants email of 10th june shows an extended list of items that his builder carried out in claimants absense while I was on holiday and without my consent  Quality of skirting board that was fitted around the curved wall inside the bathroom and also in the lounge.  see above . Toilet fitted too close to the radiator where you could potentially burn your leg Claimant shown this at outset I cant  comment too much as I have no measurments see above . Hardly no space for you to get off the toilet when sat down, especially if you are tall.  This was pointed out prior to fitting the floor . The hot and cold feed were incorrectly placed to the wrong connection on the sink  Easy 5 minute flexible pipe swap over £10 . The vanity unit isn’t suitable due to the position of the stop tap. Small hole cut in the vanity unit base to try and switch the tap off  see above . No caulk used around the door frames  easy fix £15 . The extractor fan, where you used a plastic round tube, going to a square tube that was held on by gaffer tape. The square tube then went into a round hole on the outside, this was then filled with foam gap.  Easy fix £25 . The pocket door felt like it wasn’t fixed well, the door at the bottom wasn’t sliding on to the runner very well and you had to help it onto the run. Also no lock on the door.  a relatively easy fix £25 . The boiler door frame had to be replaced due to the timber that was used. The door also was replaced due to the door being fitted to fix into the twisted door frame wood. The door had been shaved so it would fit into door frame that was twisted.  I wasnt aware of this prior to my holiday The architrave used inside the boiler room was short, had a piece taken out of it. The architrave in the toilet wasn’t fitted well.this is subjective . You used two single sockets for the bathroom and boiler room. Where I only needed to have I double switch. I fitted a 2 gang light light switch . The door frame going into the garage you left gaps between the wood and the wall.  maybe required a little filler of quadrant bead£10 . Door handle not fixed correctly and is stiff  easy fix £5 . The window, one opening window doesn’t look level, the other you can’t open it and leave it slightly open in a lock position  fixed by me on my return . Skirting by the radiator, the hole had been cut too big and had just been filled with filler.  ?? £10 to make good? . One plank of flooring wasn’t fitted flush and my toe caught it sitting upwards. poor quality flooring supplied by claimant an easy fix £25   All pricing is subjective as I didnt have the chance to  look at the complaints   Except for moving toilet and replacing pcoket door all snags are relatively minor items That could have been easliy remedied Interestingly he doesnt mention taking out the pocket door wall, lifting up the floor to move the toilet replacing drains and making new wall      
    • That's great news and thank you for letting us know. I'll amend your thread title. HB
    • Ironically, 2 weeks after no updates the parcel has been located and delivered today!! maybe the Evri system is not as bad as it used to be (for me, at least...). Annoying that I spent 3 hours yesterday brushing up on my consumer legislation, but at least I'm well equipped to handle any more issues going forwards! Apologies to have used up the forum's bandwidth and feel free to mark as "resolved".
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Euro Car Parks - debt recovery?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2188 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is my 2nd run in with ECP.

First one, about forgetting to purchase a ticket, was dropped by them after their follow-up letter which nicely increased the demand from £60 to £100.

 

This time I made sure to buy a ticket but overran the allowed time (I think I was 6 minutes over a 3 hour limit but the letter didn't stipulate). I received, and promptly forgot, their first letter and was away for the final 2 weeks of the 28 days they gave me to appeal their second letter.

 

I went to lodge my appeal and was told: 'No further appeal can be made against this Parking Charge Notice (PCN) – the PCN has been forwarded to Debt Recovery Plus Ltd. All/any communication must now be directly with Debt Recovery Plus Ltd who’s contact details are on http://www.debtrecoveryplus.co.uk or telephone 02082346775.'

 

This to me implies they've sold the debt to a DCA rather than do what they've threatened in the past which is to take me to court and push for a CCJ.

 

To me this is just a non-credit related issue and one that cannot result in a default or CCJ against me, damaging my credit rating, nor is it anything that can result in legal action, and so is something I shouldn't be concerned about. Am I right?

 

The charge itself is excessive - £60 (later increased to £100) for overstaying on a ticket is in breach of what they can charge and as I understand it, they can only claim for lost earnings - which would simply be the cost of a ticket to cover the extra minutes I was parked.

 

Having previously laughed off a DCA when I did receive a default on a credit card debt, I'm not bothered at all about a DCA chasing a parking ticket, assuming my understanding of the situation is correct.

 

And if I am right, isn't it bizarre that a parking company renowned for taking legal action has decided to wave the white flag and sell on to a DCA?

 

Thanks in advance.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It hasnt been sold to a dca..

Read their letter properly!!

 

It says our client...

 

Yes you can get a CCJ and yes it would show on your credit file

 

A dca is not a BAILIFF

And has ZERO legal powers

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were 6 minutes over the time allowed, sit back and let them do their worst. Don't respond to a single thing unless and until you receive a letter before action from ECP.

 

Both the IPC and BPA (of which ECP is a member) Code of Practice for AOS Members states that a grace period must be given, and that that grace period must be a minimum of 10 minutes. So you've got nothing to worry about here :thumb:

 

 

You'll get the usual threat-o-gram chain from Desperate Recovery Pass, but they're very carefully worded to stay on the right side of the law (just), and they are nothing to worry about.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It hasnt been sold to a dca..

Read their letter properly!!

 

It says our client...

Don't shout at me to read their letter properly when I already posted exactly what was said, that it was on their website appeal section, and that there's no mention of 'client'!

 

I also checked their letters and there's no mention of 'passing to a 'client', DCA, or anyone else.

 

 

Here are the answers you requested:

 

Date of the infringement

05/04/2018

 

 

Date on the NTK

Letter 1: 12/04/2018

Letter 2: 14/05/2018

 

 

Date received

18th May (letter 2)

 

 

Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?]

Yes - paragraph 9(2)(b) of schedule 4

 

 

Is there any photographic evidence of the event?

Just 2 pics - supposedly of my licence plate upon entry and exit

 

 

Have you appealed? {y/n?]

Too late to appeal

 

 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?]

N/A

 

 

Who is the parking company?

Euro Car Parks

 

Where exactly [carpark name and town]

Aytoun Street, Manchester

 

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

POPLA

 

 

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS.

BPA

 

 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here

Letter 2 states I have missed the appeal deadline and that the amount due is now £100.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were 6 minutes over the time allowed, sit back and let them do their worst. Don't respond to a single thing unless and until you receive a letter before action from ECP.

 

Both the IPC and BPA (of which ECP is a member) Code of Practice for AOS Members states that a grace period must be given, and that that grace period must be a minimum of 10 minutes. So you've got nothing to worry about here :thumb:

 

 

You'll get the usual threat-o-gram chain from Desperate Recovery Pass, but they're very carefully worded to stay on the right side of the law (just), and they are nothing to worry about.

I assume it was a 6 minutes and a 3 hour ticket although I can't remember. I believe minimum purchase is 2 hours. All the letters state is that I was clocked entering at 5:50pm and leaving at 8:56pm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh, re-reading this, you've not yet had a letter from Desperate Recovery Plus. Is that correct?

 

 

It'll be that letter (from DRP) that refers to 'their client'.

 

These parking charges don't get sold to the likes of DRP. Instead, DRP are paid about £15 to write you some scary letters. They'll also inflate the price to £160 for the first 2 or 3 letters, and then it'll drop again to (usually) £129 as they become more and more desperate to part you from your money.

 

Don't fall for any of their waffle, a flat battery has more power than these clowns, they're just paper tigers :wink: They'll imply that not paying them will bring you all sorts of woe's, stopping just short of threatening to sell your family in to slavery to pay the "debt" (you know, the debt that you don't actually owe), but it's all bluff and bluster to make them feel important.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also those times are from entry and exit. Not the times you were actually parked. ;)

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have fallen for their trap and misunderstood the reality of what has happend because they want you to misunderstand

Both they and DR+ make more money from ignorance than they will by pointing out the truth of the matter, which is that the bill cant go up and they cant sell it on ( see MIL collections hammerings in court)

 

So, ignore DR+, they have nothing to do with anything,

dont bother going to a parking co website for advice an ditto a DCA or even the worlds greatest solicitors-Gladstones- as they all have reasons to misguide you as their livelihood mostly depend on misrepresentation and even fraud.

 

As for the rights and wrongs of a court claim

- anyone can sue anyone over anything,

it is only when the claim is contested do you find out what is possible.

 

I can sell you Tower Bridge and sue you if you dont pay me for it despite not owning it Why? contracts old boy, contracts.

They have nothing to do with the other inconveniences of lack of authority until it gets to court and you slap in a counterclaim...

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh, re-reading this, you've not yet had a letter from Desperate Recovery Plus. Is that correct?

Correct.

 

Don't fall for any of their waffle, a flat battery has more power than these clowns, they're just paper tigers :wink: They'll imply that not paying them will bring you all sorts of woe's, stopping just short of threatening to sell your family in to slavery to pay the "debt" (you know, the debt that you don't actually owe), but it's all bluff and bluster to make them feel important.

Thanks. Am I right in assuming the most I owe is the cost of a ticket to cover the extra time I stayed - whether that's 2 hr 6m, 1hr 6m or just 6m (in which case I'm covered by the 10m allowance you mentioned?

 

the bill cant go up and they cant sell it on

Well I never knew that! Cheers!

 

the rights and wrongs of a court claim- anyone can sue anyone over anything, it is only when the claim is contested do you find out what is possible.

So where do I actually stand?

You say anyone can sue anyone in court but have they got a leg to stand on?

 

As much as I want to fight this I'm not going to risk a CCJ over £60 (or even their inflated figure of £100).

And though they say further costs can be incurred as they chase me for non-payment, are they legally allowed to do so?

 

Thx in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if 2 hours was paid for, then strictly speaking they are within their rights to ask the keeper to name the driver or cough up £100. Providing they get the procedure right. But they can't make you pay unless they take you to court and win.

 

If 3 hours was paid for, they've got absolutely no right to ask either the keeper or the driver for a single penny.

 

 

You'd think that you'd just be able to pay for the extra time, but unfortunately not even Council car parks work like that and PPC's certainly don't. They'd be out of business within about 10 minutes. No great loss when it comes to 99% of them :wink:

 

 

 

Ultimately, worst case scenario. If they take you to court, and ECP don't normally... They've tried it a few times and had their arses handed to them on a plate, usually by the Judge!

 

 

First of all you dispute their added £60 (which has been added for debt collection). As while this *might* be on the signs at the car park that the driver *might* have agreed to. As keeper, you are not a party to that contract and you never agreed to anything to do with "additional recovery costs". So, whilst these might be recoverable against the driver, they certainly aren't against the keeper and the POFA makes no allowance for those charges to be claimed from the keeper.

 

So...

 

Parking ticket £100.

"So called" solicitors costs £50.

Claim fee £25. A lot of people fold at this point, and that's what they're counting on.

Hearing fee £25

Interest to date of judgement: Usually about £4

 

So the absolute maximum that you're risking is £204.

 

Now, that's assuming that you lose at court (if it gets that far).

 

 

The only way they'd get a CCJ registered against you is IF you lost at court AND didn't pay what you were ordered within 28 days (I believe) or as ordered by the court. So, if you lost, as long as you pay up before the date that you're ordered to, no CCJ would ever appear on your credit file.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

show us the signage in place at the time and we can advise on the liklihood of any claim being successful

 

generally they are stuffed because they cant write a decent sign that makes a binding contract and even where they are close they dont get planning permission for them and so commit a criminal act anyway.

 

We will also need to see the blurb on the payment machine as that is the actual contract in this case so deviation from the signage is important.

 

Stop overthinking this and read up on it, you are no stranger to this site so do your homeworka dn come back to us.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

its also worthy to note that majority of the shopping centre car park that the part of the original undertaking secured by the council at the time of granting its use as a car park typically ensured 3hrs free parking.

no-one can over-ride that unless the council have agreed to the change.

 

 

we've seen that so many times here too.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Not had chance to go back in the past week to get the signage but will do next week.

 

In the meantime I have received the debt letter claiming additional costs and warning that if I don't comply that they'll advise their client to take me to court.

 

Should I reply to them?

Tell them they can't add charges and even if they do they're not applicable to the keeper and that I'll happily have my day in court?

Do I just write straight to ECP and say all this - letting them know it's more hassle than it's worth for them to chase me?

 

Thx

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...