Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Builder made me order and pay for materials, but taken some of it!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2138 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I am having some reconfiguration work done, to increase the size of my retail unit by taking some walls out etc.

 

A building inspector is involved to check the steels.

 

I requested to have insulation put in the ceiling, now I am not sure if this needed to be done as part of building regs, however my builder said if I order the insulation he will collect and put it in.

 

He measured up and told me to order 15 sheets of it at £50 a sheet, so I went and ordered it.

 

He collected it.

 

But when he bought it he only unloaded 10 sheets which I found out by accident when checking my cctv for something else, and the area they have put the insulation in for is about 10 sheets worth, the remaining ceiling he now says they are not doing due to water pipes etc, but kind of indirectly said, there isn't any left anyway!

 

I am 100% sure he hasn't bought anymore and the merchant said he collected all the sheets at the same time.

 

Is this classed as theft? Or would i need to take him to small claims if i wanted to take further and he doesn't back down?

 

Its more about the principle of the matter rather than the money, as he measured up and told me what to order but blatently taken the p***! I know he has as he was telling me before the price of insulation is sky high at the minute and trying to get hold of as much as he can when it comes cheap but struggling to get it cheap!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not unusual for builders to stock up at customers expense.

This is usually done with all inclusive quotes where material is not listed, but as i understand he specifically charged you for 15 sheets but used and delivered only 10.

You'll have to point this out to him and pay just for the 10 sheets.

If you have already paid him, ask for a partial refund, however, it all comes down to what he wrote on his quote.

If he wrote the exact amount of sheets needed, you might get something back, but if he simply stated that he was going to insulate the ceiling and it would cost £x, i don't think there's nothing you can do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not unusual for builders to stock up at customers expense.

This is usually done with all inclusive quotes where material is not listed, but as i understand he specifically charged you for 15 sheets but used and delivered only 10.

You'll have to point this out to him and pay just for the 10 sheets.

If you have already paid him, ask for a partial refund, however, it all comes down to what he wrote on his quote.

If he wrote the exact amount of sheets needed, you might get something back, but if he simply stated that he was going to insulate the ceiling and it would cost £x, i don't think there's nothing you can do.

 

He said if we want insulation we have to order it otherwise they aren't going to insulate it. So he measured up and said goto buildbase and order 15 sheets and I will collect it. He collected it and only ever unloaded 10 sheets and the area he has insulated roughly measure to 10 sheets worth.

 

So blatantly taken 5. I have invoice for 15 and cctv shows only 10 were bought in!

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case, as you ordered and paid for 15 sheets, he owes you 5 of them.

Tell him.

 

Do you know if part of building regs you have to insulate flat roof? He put steels in etc and I have an incling they should insulate as part of building regs but made me pay for it although initially he was supposed to provide all material required for the job apart from paint flooring kitchen bathroom for residential part.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

building regs irrelevant to your problem so dont get distracted. It is about the dishonesty of a builder regarding the misappropriation of the materials so stick to that.

Ultimately you might end up having to sue him so keep cctv safe and get any info you can written down regarding supplier of materials. Many builders have a credit agreement with local builders merchansts so if your chap didnt then that tells you a great deal about his credit worthiness and how much or little others trust him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In fact, as ericsbrother said, if he asked you to buy the material it means that he's not trusted by builders merchants, otherwise he would have access to trade prices and credit with them.

Even major merchants like Wickes and selco offer trade prices, so no excuse there.

The only time i bought something not from merchants when i was in the building trade, was for something particular which is cheaper online and not readily available in store (for example some specialised hardware from Simpson strong tie)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...