Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I am a University Student looking to rent accommodation along with three other Students We found a four bedroomed flat and called the Letting Agent to say we were very interested We had a viewing and raised some questions We wanted to check if there was a break clause in the Lease The Letting Agent said we would need to pay a Holding Deposit whilst he waited for the Landlady to return from Holiday So we paid £750 split between the four of us to the Letting Agent We then received an email to say the Holding Deposit was non refundable References were then checked and the tenancy Agreement arrived which needed to be signed by each guarantor and tenant and send back the full signed agreement At this point we got to see the Tenancy Agreement for the first time and the break clause of 6 months was nowhere to be seen so this made us very nervous and we decided to pull out as we felt we didn’t want the risk of not being allowed to leave the property until a full year was up We emailed the Letting Agent who replied with the following: The holding deposit is not refundable as you are withdrawing from this deal. I will need a confirmation from Everyone that they are withdrawing and we will put the property back on the market.   The move in date is on the 4th Sept and the landlady is left with a very short time to find another tenant.    This will incur a lot of extra cost from both us as an agency and the landlady which we will try to recover. So, my question is are we eligible to get a refund of our Holding Deposit – bearing in mind we were not told we wouldn’t get it back until after we had paid it?
    • As for the rest @BankFodder please wait for my bullet points account and further uploads (I'm in the process of converting a lot of my files and screenshots to more condensed pdf thanks to reading one of your posts how to do this for free...but, it's taking time as I also have artritis in practically every bone in my body, as well as fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue, which affects my hands, and I have a lot of redacting to do).   I appreciate your trying to get an angle on this and your keen to help me in the best you can but, if I keep getting sidetracked like this, it will be counterproductive and frustrating for both/all of us.   On my #13 I gave a link to your skeleton argument pdf because, I'd carefully researched the posts for days before joining (as well as looking at posts over the last 5 years), which btw needs a bit more redaction on p6 as it's showing [her] name. That could be my case to a 'T' except add in the years back to 2006/2007, particularly since I went on their computer system and was 'treated' to their 1st system migration, and all the others that have followed. Not sure about this person's status but, for me you can also add in the fact that they've: continually failed to put me on their PSR; lost my password more than once (the one call I managed to recall was December 2016 when he openely admitted he couldn't find a trace of my being on a password scheme and they now have two whenever the meter reader arrives...and yes, I've done an SAR to the distributor already because they've failed to keep them informed of my status, that's all in hand); continually ignored my medical status of being disabled and unable to read my own meter (I've repeatedly told them about this, btw) due to not only bone-on-bone arthritis in my right knee (diagnosed 2011) but also a crumbling spine (extensive arthrits) with a prolapsed disc and extensive nerve damage (eventually diagnosed 2014), which leaves me at risk of developing corda equina; continually ignored my vulnerability status; and excarrebated my MH/PTSD over the years with their continuing bullying and threats.        
    • Hi Everyone. With the deadline for claiming PPI coming up I thought I better make one last attempt. Couple of quick questions though.. 1. I tried claiming with RBS about 5 years ago and they rejected my claim. Is there any point trying again? 2. I was going to use a company as I'm getting bombarded with "last chance" emails, but I probably don't want to do that as I've always done my own thing. That said, if I make my "Find out if you had PPI" enquiry online, does that mean I'm in before the deadline, or do I actually have to make a complaint before the 29th Aug?   Many thanks for any advice/ help
    • Har dee har har! Thanks! Im 3k apart . I need help so they drop the 3 k. But you got that! kr escaped!
  • Our picks

Karlos1

Claiming expenses after successful defence of claim

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 444 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Just after a bit of advice. I have successfully defended a claim brought against me and at the end of the hearing I asked the Judge if I could submit financials for consideration. I was told I could claim £45 for a half day hearing attendance but no more. The case has actually cost me £1200 to defend (time off work, mileage, parking etc) which is of course a tad annoying. Seems unfair that I can be dragged through the civil legal system, win the case and be out of pocket. Is this normal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was this a small claim? If so, the amount that can be claimed for expenses is extremely limited. I'm also finding it a little difficult to work out how it could have cost you £1200 to defend unless you instructed a solicitor.


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Was this a small claim? If so, the amount that can be claimed for expenses is extremely limited. I'm also finding it a little difficult to work out how it could have cost you £1200 to defend unless you instructed a solicitor.

 

Yes it was small claims court. £1200 in lost wages due to the hours spent writing my defence etc ( I work for myself and charge by the hour).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately costs in small claims are limited to £50 plus time spent at the actual hearing. Whilst frustrating, this is so that people aren't put off using the Courts because of the risks of paying the other parties costs, which are often completely disproportionate to the amount of the claim.

 

I appreciate that someone who is self-employed often works very long hours, but most people would have been able to deal with the paperwork around their work commitments. The only chance would have been if you could prove that the claimant's behaviour was unreasonable from the outset, but that is a very high bar to cross and the fact that they lost is nowhere near enough.

 

It may be small consolation, but at least you did win.


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes it was small claims court. £1200 in lost wages due to the hours spent writing my defence etc ( I work for myself and charge by the hour).

 

Long Defence at that rate? self employed - ever been on a jury and tried to claim over above their figure


:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Long Defence at that rate? self employed - ever been on a jury and tried to claim over above their figure

 

Took a lot of time to put together. No, never been on Jury duty thankfully!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Llp rate would have to show how got to the figure, even high grade solicitor has a ceiling by grade on cost etc, you are dreaming in regards that figure and be shown as a chancer by a judge,, no doubt they will see straight thru it, jury i.e self employed , by the way jury service is not voluntary you would need a good excuse not to attend, but the experience can be an eye opener for you of what things are happening around you that you do not know.


:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Llp rate would have to show how got to the figure, even high grade solicitor has a ceiling by grade on cost etc, you are dreaming in regards that figure and be shown as a chancer by a judge,, no doubt they will see straight thru it, jury i.e self employed , by the way jury service is not voluntary you would need a good excuse not to attend, but the experience can be an eye opener for you of what things are happening around you that you do not know.

 

Yes, appreciate that there are ceilings etc. I'm not self employed but company owner. It's very easy to reach £1200 very quickly with hours put in and mileage, parking etc etc. Just seems unfair that someone can be dragged through the legal process, win the case and be out of pocket. Never mind, it's all done now so time to move on I guess. As for Jury service, one of my lads has just done it this month. Very interesting by all accounts although I would rather not get called up personally.

 

Thanks for the replies all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately that is the so called legal service of this country, when you think the DJ is on £100,000 + per year and causing misery in most cases


:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As mentioned above..this is the norm in a small claim...as a litigant in person in can work to your advantage, for example many companies need to employ a solicitor at a cost of at least £100 - £200 per hour, on the small track they cant claim this back so its often uneconimical for them to chase you for small amounts.

 

Actually losing £1200 does sound excessive to be honest, as mentioned you should be able to fit the work around your work..actually having days off and losing money is rare.

 

There are some ways to get costs (this is how you should refer to it)...first is to use the strike out process to get rid of the claim completely (or partially) at a very early stage, pre-allocation, pre-allocation means before it has been allocated to track (small) and therefore the normal costs rules DO apply. The otjher is to point out to the judge the other side behaved unreasonably or did something that made you incur more costs or dragged the dispute out.

 

Read the CPR as all of this is covered > https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...