Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi   With a SAR all you have to do is ask for 'ALL DATA' (this way it does not matter what format they hold that data whether it be digital, email, telephone calls (recorded), written etc).   They then have 30 Days to comply once they have acknowledged your SAR Request (that is unless they require ID Verification) which the 30 Days time limit does not start until they have verified your ID if requested)   Also can I add in DHL response in post#36 I hate it when any Company/Business etc. has the nerve to use the get out clause of 'Human Error'.    This is not the case as it was 'Maladministration' by DHL' not 'Human Error' as stated to you, irrespective of who/which employee of DHL made the 'Human Error' the buck stops with DHL as who/which employee made that error was Employed by DHL.
    • pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform. [if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] .  register as an individual  note the long gateway number given  then log in .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform .  defend all  leave jurisdiction unticked   goto the defence filing section  file the following:     1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).  2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.  . If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant. .  3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC]  or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied. .. ..ends..   dx          
    • I passed on the article and link to friend. Between us we will now try get the required info to the correct location so that they (whoever in the Govt) can sort out what he is owed. I will keep you updated.  This thread may help others in similar situations. Ethel Street - very helpful research.  Thank you.  Seems like you came up trumps!
    • numerous erudio/drydens claimform threads here already - use our search top right.   your appears to be statute barred as you've never heard of erudio so would not have deferred since your last direct deferment to SLC in 2013    if you wish to bother to even send CCA/CPR that's upto you but the bottom line is to erudio you've ignored everything to date yoy might also ignore a claimform.   but ofcourse you are not!!   if the above is true   pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform. [if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] .  register as an individual  note the long gateway number given  then log in .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform .  defend all  leave jurisdiction unticked   goto the defence filing section  file the following: 1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).  2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.  . If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant. .  3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC]  or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied. .. ..ends..   dx      
    • Well I would want my £50 back also but hey ho if your satisfied its been resolved.....there was no way you could ever be liable anyway as your contract was with TC not RC.   Thread title updated.   Andy
  • Our picks

Hindi

Help with PCN from CPM while in North Middlesex University hospital

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 595 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I would be very grateful if I could receive any advice concerning the parking charge notice I've received on Monday.

I've filled this up :

For PNC's received through the post [ANPR camera capture]

 

please answer the following questions.

 

1 Date of the infringement 21/05/2018

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 31/05/2018

 

3 Date received 4/06/2018

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?] Yes

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? yes

 

6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up your appeal] Not (yet?)

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

 

7 Who is the parking company? CPM

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] North Middlesex University Hospital, London

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

 

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure,

please check HERE Yes, IAS

 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here NO

 

I went to the hospital for a scan, I thought it would be quick and paid parking for an hour but I overstayed by 33 minutes.

 

When I asked the guy at the Radiology reception, he told me that if I was to go back to my car to add some money to my parking ticket I would lose my place in the queue!! Now CPM wants me to pay £100 or £60 if paid within 14 days.

 

Please advice if you can!

Thank you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

 

Thank you for providing the information, the guys should be along later to advise. I've also amended your thread title to show the parking company and location.

 

 

I don't think we're likely to advise you to pay this, but the guys may need more information.

 

 

Best, HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As they are members of the IAS you wont get a proper or fair appeal so dont bother.

 

What we need is more detail on what the supposed breach was and images of the signage at the hospital,including any or none as you enter the land from the public highway.

 

It is unusual for the parking co's to actually have signs that create a binding contract so take pictures of any different type of sign and note it location in relation to where your vehicle was parked.

 

They commonly have signs that say patients only or staff only so note what markings are visible on the roadway if they contradict the signs.

 

Lastly we would like to see the NTK they sent with your personal detailes redacted so no name and adress, car reg or reference numbers or barcodes but leave the rest of any image of your vehicle as clear as you can and leave all dates and times visible

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your answers, here are the pictures of the NTK

I can't tell about the signs for now.

pic1.jpg

pic2.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, no hurry but it would be useful if you can remember to do so, ideally in the next month.

 

AS they claim that the driver failed to pay for the duration of the stay then the wording on the signs and also the ticket machine are very important s it suggests there was some payment but not enough. This menas that a contractwas entered into but not necessarily one determined by their signs so seeing the blurb on the ticket payment machine is actually very important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I understand. Yes, I had paid for an hour, but overstayed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...