Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Paula


upton11
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6208 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Also when i click onto to threader names, on the left hand side - i am denied access.

 

Paula

 

I've got this problem too!! :(

FIRST DIRECT: £4751.86 SETTLED IN FULL 5/07/06 :-)

 

TESCO VISA CARD: £90 SETTLED IN FULL 12/08/06 :)

 

LLOYDS TSB: £4403.59 SETTLED IN FULL 17/08/06 :)

EGG: £451.52 SETTLED IN FULL 18/01/07 :)

 

 

Opinions and advice of kazzaw are independent, offered informally, without prejudice, without liability, and not endorsed by the Bank Action Group. If in any doubt, seek the advice of a qualified, insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks Kazzaw, it is reassuring to know it is not just me. i hate not having my ticks - it took me ages to find your thread, After all I had to know if you had heard anything!

 

regards

 

Paula

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

This thread might be useful - there's another 3 claimants with the same order word for word (I think - check just in case!) http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/37561-starting-three-claims-lloyds-2.html#post535276

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Smokeyspot Hi,

 

So sorry I have been away for so long. Have you written to NCC yet to try and move your directions hearing? I haven't got around to it yet.

 

If you haven't, let's thread together - if you know what I mean and cobble an application together

 

i have been carrying my letters around for weeks now and really must do something soon

 

Paula

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paula, like you I've done nothing so far. I am going to send the new order because that has definite time scales. I don't want to send it without reading everything about it and I just haven't had time in the last few weeks. I will try and get more info this week and let you know what I intend to do!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Fantastic news today - came home to a letter from SC&M saying that LLoyds will settle in full within the next 5 days!. I checked the interest - all well there. Amazing result as the Directions hearing was not listed until early May -

 

We are stunned and are having a very early Friday night.

 

Will read around as been away so long to see if this is the new thing

 

I am thrilled, and as ever a huge, huge thank you to all on the site. Looks like we got there

 

Regards and love to all

 

Paula

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great news Paula, well done!:D

 

Yes, it seems that LTSB are at last bowing to the inevitable. Quite a few claimants have now received full 'no strings' payouts, myself included.:)

 

Enjoy the moment (and the money!)

 

Els

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Paula!!!!!:D;) That's great news and very well deserved, congratulations!!

 

I view of recent events, I'd keep an eye on your account though if I were you! Here's what I'm talking about, if you haven't seen it already - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/76782-awful-news-lloyds-have.html

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic news!!!

Well done really chuffed for you. Hope the new job is going well and that the money pays for a nice holiday!!

Again, really well done!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey you Guido,

 

Gary is not a harbinger of doom - i went to the link and was appalled - i am sure it was just an error though. I am off to find your thread and see where you are up to.

 

Isn't it amazing, you leave this site for a few weeks and when you get back there are hundreds of new people. The 'movement' is certainly gathering pace, even my cynical, lazy friends have started writing letters with a view to reclaiming their charges. They ignored me initially when i said to do it, as they all thought it would be too much effort - but to my mind it is the best paid job i have ever had - 2 letters, 2 forms, reading a website and bingo - a sum equivalent to 2 months wages!!

 

i might even do my own account. I don't think i have had many charges, but who knows there may be a few hundred there from the last 6 years - certainly worth a look

 

Paula

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paula I am very pleased for you and I am very envious also

 

My claim started before yours and the hearing date is in at the end of April and is therefore earlier than yours. Pffft. Goes to show, no rhyme or reason with this lot.

 

Hopefully my cheque is in the post. Very pleased for you though, must be fantastic for you and your family

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done Paula. I haven't heard anything from the norwich court but my claim is with barclays so maybe I'll have to go ahead with the prelim hearing - hope not!

 

My date with Lloyds is end of April, date with Barclays May time....

 

The prelim is literally 10 minutes, more of an inconv. if anything

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...