Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Asset Claimform - old Lending Stream PDL debt***Claim Dismissed***


BurnCK
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1854 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I won't, I just wanted to be sure of the address to send to since I have no claimant details.

CCA and CRA both sent.

I will complete the acknowledgement form and send by post and email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

good job

there are 100's of asset pdl claimform threads here already

now time to get reading up

 

use the search CAG box of the top red toolbar

 

asset claimform PDL

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good makes things simpler

right don't forget

regardless to if/if not the produce paperwork

you must not miss 3rd july defence filing date

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Particulars of claim:

 

1.the claimant claims this amount in respect of an unpaid loan, regulated by the consumer credit act 1974. the loan was funded by the lending stream.

 

2.the defendant has failed to make payments in accordance with the terms of the credit agreement.

 

3.the credit agreement was assigned to the claimant, upon which a notice of assignment was sent to the defendant.

the defendant has either failed to respond to the claimant or has failed to maintain regular payments.

 

4.the claimant issued a letter of claimlink3.gif, providing the defendant with a further opportunity to arrange repayment of the outstanding balance, to no avail.

 

5.the claimant claims interest under section 69of the county courts act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 20/06/2016 to 31/05/2018 on £336.44 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of 0.07.

 

The Claimant’s statement of case fails to give adequate information to enable myself to properly assess my position with regards the claim.

The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5(3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. Paragraph 1 of the particulars is not admitted with regards to the Defendant entering into an Agreement referred to in the Particulars of Claim for an amount of £423.80.

 

2. Paragraph 2 is denied that the defendant failed to abide by the terms of contract.

 

3. Paragraph 3 is denied that the claimant has served any Notice of Assignment pursuant to the Law & Property Act 1925.

 

4. Paragraph 4 is denied the Claimant has not made any contact or followed any pre-action protocollink3.gif in an attempt to resolve this matter and is put to strict proof thereof.

 

On the 13th June 2018 the Defendant sent a request for inspection of documents under Civil Procedurelink3.gif Rule 31.14. It was requested that the Claimant provide copies of the following: 1. Agreement / Contract 2. Notice of Assignment 3. Letter of Claim 4. Statement of Account

 

The claimant has failed to comply.

 

5.On the 13th June 2018 the Defendant sent a formal request for a copy of the original agreement to the Claimant pursuant to section 78 of the consumer creditlink3.gif Act 1974 along with the statutory £1 fee.

 

The Claimant has failed to comply with s78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and by virtue of s78(6) Consumer Credit Act 1974 cannot enforce the agreement.

 

6.. The claim is not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing monies stated to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for;

© show how any breach occurred and a valid Default Notice was issued,

(d) show how it has legal assignment of any alleged debt.

 

7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

8. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Paragraph 1 of the particulars is not admitted with regards to the Defendant entering into an Agreement referred to in the Particulars of Claim for an amount of £423.80.

 

You sure...you entered into various and they have lumped them together ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Paragraph 1 of the particulars is not admitted with regards to the Defendant entering into an Agreement referred to in the Particulars of Claim for an amount of £423.80.

 

You sure...you entered into various and they have lumped them together ?

 

Yes 3 loans lumped together. Sorry, I'm not sure what I've done wrong there. I took my steer from other posts on here who put the same thing in their defence. I obviously did enter into an agreement but not for the amount quoted.

 

Can you explain what I've done wrong there? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

It just requires re phrasing ...say....

 

1. Paragraph 1 is noted. It is admitted that I have in the past entered into various agreements with The Lending Stream.It is denied that I have ever entered into one regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 for the alleged value of this claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I have amended the defence as you advised.

Can I ask why when I read others defence statements on here they all say they don't admit entering into an agreement? Does them lumping all 3 into 1 have any bearing on things ?

I have still had no response / reply to the CCA request made.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Claimant’s statement of case fails to give adequate information to enable myself to properly assess my position with regards the claim.

The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5(3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

1. Paragraph 1 is noted. It is admitted that I have in the past entered into various agreements with The Lending Stream. It is denied that I have ever entered into one regulated by the consumer creditlink3.gif act 1974 for the alleged value of this claim.

2. Paragraph 2 is denied. The claimant has failed to state what agreement number the alleged amount refers to.Therefore the terms of the contract are unknown.

 

3. Paragraph 3 is denied . I have never received a Notice of Assignment pursuant to the Law & Property Act 1925.

 

4. Paragraph 4 is denied the Claimant has not made any contact or followed any pre-action protocollink3.gif in an attempt to resolve this matter and is put to strict proof thereof.

On the 13th June 2018 the Defendant sent a request for inspection of documents under Civil Procedurelink3.gif Rule 31.14. It was requested that the Claimant provide copies of the following: 1.Agreement / Contract 2. Notice of Assignment 3. letter of claimlink3.gif 4. Statement of Account. The claimant has failed to comply.

 

5.On the 13th June 2018 the Defendant sent a formal request for a copy of the original agreement to the Claimant pursuant to section 78 of the consumer creditlink3.gif Act 1974 along with the statutory £1 fee. The Claimant has failed to comply with s78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and by virtue of s78(6) Consumer Credit Act 1974 cannot enforce the agreement.

 

6.. The claim is not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing monies stated to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for;

© show how any breach occurred and a valid Default Notice was issued,

(d) show how it has legal assignment of any alleged debt.

 

7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

8. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Edited by Andyorch
Tweaked 2/3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its your choice to submit a truthful defence or perjure yourself...yours is now truthful...you didnt enter into an agreement for that amount...therefore the claimants plea is false.

 

If they had stated.....

 

1.the claimant claims this amount in respect of an unpaid loan (s), regulated by the consumer credit act 1974. the loan(s) were funded by the lending stream.

 

Then that would be true

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK thank you, I'm trying to understand as I go along. I intend to submit my defence tomorrow, is there anything obvious I've missed out? Anything I need to review?

 

 

Many thanks for the help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just tweaked your points 2/3 slightly.....and added the failed to comply with PAP paragraph to your intro.

 

Good to submit.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No thats only for cross reference and checking.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

so you've already sent your N180 back?

or you mean its with you now?

you've not updated your thread in a month so we don't know where you are in the process

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you had CCA/CPR returns??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Say yes for now

The q's are asked again

If still devoid of all paperwork then say no

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

OK I've received a copy of Asset's statement and documents they've filed with the court (About 30 pages including copies of the credit agreements I asked for but never received). They've confirmed they won't be attending court which is in 2 weeks. Is there anything I need to prepare between now and then ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan up their ws to one multipage pdf inc the exhibits please

read upload

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

have done your ws? when is the hearing?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Big gap since the 6th Aug 2018 posting.....since then you will have received a Notice of Allocation with the courts direction what each party must comply with by what date...hence the claimant has complied and you have not.

 

Normal directions are both parties submit a witness statement and evidence ( disclosure)...normally 14 days before the hearing date...better get your skates on.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...