Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2094 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hopefully yes

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

there are no rules for dca's

750'000 speculative claimform are issued every year

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks, hope i'm not missing something here but..on halifax account , it says settled... but has a default date for november 2012,,, i copy this i found on the net...

What does ‘settled’ mean on your credit report?

 

‘Settled’ means that you’ve paid your debt without default. When you miss several payments consecutively, or sometimes intermittently during the course of a loan term, for example, the lender may add a default marker to your credit report.

 

i would like to know does this mean this was paid?

one issue on my file is due to fall off tomorrow.. as defaulted 27 june 2012.. i will be interested to see if this does happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Already explained in post 49:madgrin:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well stop reading elsewhere!!

 

If you have a question

Re read your thread first

As like your others

You appear to simply ask the same q's youve already asked using different words

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes so sorry about that..

.i do suffer ocd and what happens is i can easily get confused , because i can not retain info. very long.

 

i just now signed up to check my file for the free 30 day thing.

.seemingly , that halifax account is still active under previous address.

.apparently this can be detrimental as it can look like fraud.. to a prospective lender.

 

.would it do any harm for me to call the local halifax to ask about this?

also the defaulted account of 27.06.12 has not yet fallen off my report..

 

i read it can take a further 28 days administration.. is this correct?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

no its not fraud

simply that you failed to update your creditors when you moved

which is rather silly

hope all your other account esp those in debt show the correct address else you are in danger of backdoor CCJ's

 

i'd be telling Halifax and any others your correct address even if the defaulted date is now spent esp if the debt is listed under a dca name!

 

its can take several weeks for credit files to be updated as advised before when the default reaches its 6th birthday

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks as mentioned before one halifax account satisfied, but that will only mean a dca has bought it...its due to fall off on 7.11.18.

 

.the other states up to date.

.yet i only remember having one account with them.

 

.i have not thought of halifax in years.

.used any account with them.

 

.i intend to call them to establish if that account is still active under my old address

..can this affect my cred rating?...

 

i mean can they default me from now.. if i come to their attention?

 

and good news about account due to drop off today

...i called equifax and the guy took it off. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

it needs to be registered at your current address get Halifax to update the address

if it is not defaulted and not in debit then it will not be hurting your score...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

ok..

here goes.

.slightly off on tangent..

not sure if this should be under a separate thread..

 

i now only have 2 default marks on my equifax file..one is due to go on 23 this month.. other 7 November..

 

i am getting calls from this pra group dca..

.which doesn't bother me in itself...

as is only automated message

 

..they are associated with the default of 23 july.

.now, i am given to wondering if they would attempt a court claim at this late stage

..thereby losing me the statute barred protection.

 

.it occurred to me,

if i wrote them a prove it now.

..they would be caught up in that and not have time to prepare claim.

..of course they could already have begun the procedure..

 

Also

..i have won several times in the court against such people.

. as is documented here

 

..does a court win mean that a default recorded on a credit file is automatically removed?

or would i still wait the 6 year mark?

 

Another query

Equifax, removed defaults recently..

immediately upon me calling them and saying this default is now 6 years old today..

.. but checkmyfile refuse to do this and are saying it can be another 28 days for administration.

.. which seems ridiculous....

have i any right here?

 

any help on these subjects much appreciated.

Edited by Andyorch
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

A court " win " as you describe it does not remove the default markers...there is no connection of action.

 

If it takes 28 days...then its 28 days.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok..

here goes.

.slightly off on tangent..

not sure if this should be under a separate thread..

 

i now only have 2 default marks on my equifax file..one is due to go on 23 this month.. other 7 November..

 

i am getting calls from this pra group dca..

.which doesn't bother me in itself...

as is only automated message

 

..they are associated with the default of 23 july.

.now, i am given to wondering if they would attempt a court claim at this late stage

..thereby losing me the statute barred protection.

 

.it occurred to me,

if i wrote them a prove it now.

..they would be caught up in that and not have time to prepare claim.

..of course they could already have begun the procedure..NO they've gotto abide by the Pre Action Protocol first that's another +30days for you to answer before rhey can

Also

..i have won several times in the court against such people.

. as is documented here

 

..does a court win mean that a default recorded on a credit file is automatically removed?

or would i still wait the 6 year mark?

 

Another query

Equifax, removed defaults recently..

immediately upon me calling them and saying this default is now 6 years old today..

.. but checkmyfile refuse to do this and are saying it can be another 28 days for administration.

.. which seems ridiculous....

have i any right here?

 

any help on these subjects much appreciated.

 

 

andy has answered the other one

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop clutching at straws

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was about to say that... 6 years from date of default...

Delinquent vs default are the same thing... Just worded differently per CRA...

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its just that i found delinquent date of may,(2012) on a credit report i must have asked for years ago.. on paper..but default date of november 2012, naturally i would prefer that off my file sooner..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...