Jump to content


Cabot/nolans SPC Claim - old Tesco credit card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1852 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't waste money on them no...

1st class with free proof of posting from the PO counter will do.

 

you now need to use the search CAG box of the top red toolbar

 

cabot nolans SPC Claim.

 

then you'll understand why nolans are the sneakiest snake in the grass toward Scottish debts...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

multipage pdf done for you above

 

can I confirm your response form contained the following:

 

It is admitted with regards to the respondent once having financial dealings with [original Creditor] in the past.

I do not recall any precise details or agreements and have sought verification from the claimant who has not complied with my request for further information. It is denied that I am indebted for any alleged balance claimed.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so why did you not copy and paste properly?

 

you sent one to nolans by royal mail

you must have printed that off?

is the full d1 text on that?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

for some reason some text was missing from response form copy...

 

here's is the original with my details missing

 

hopefully this works....

---------------------------

 

all the text is in box d1 but for some reason when i upload the pdf some text is missing... i have copy and pasted text from d1/d2 and uploaded it as a text file see latest post.....

responseform.txt

Edited by dx100uk
merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

so, back to post 30

 

did the sheriff get to see that sentence please?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Re. my reply to court and claiment....

Question from court....The respondent is ordered to write to the claimiant at least 14 days before the date (14/2/2019) of the case management conference to clarify these issues:

* Does the respondent accept that he entered into an agreement with TPF and that he is in default in respect of that agreement?

 

could i have help with the wording for this reply or will I just say yes x 2...

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 30

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

load of cobrers and Nolan know it.

 

there a letter here from them on an earlier SPC claim whereby they state totally the opposite with regard to a default notice:

 

as our client are only seeking the arrears under the agreement a default notice is not needed....MAKE YOUR MIND UP NOLANDS..which is it??

 

little tip ..YOU NEED THE DEFAULT NOTICE TO LITIGATE on any value..read the consumer credit act...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you wish..doesn't remove the fact they've no default notice...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update.. futher on from my 14th Feb. meeting at court, I have now received an Incidental Order Application>>>

The Simple procedure Incidental Orders Form

---------------------------------------------------------

 

C1. what orders would you like the court to make?

-----------------------------------------------------------

BoxC1.

*******************************************************************************************************

1. To discharge the hearing fixed for 11th march restricting the issue as to whether or not the debt has been properly assigned.

 

2. To grant Decree against the Respondant together with expenses.

*******************************************************************************************************

 

C2. why should the court make these orders

--------------------------------------------------------

the party making the application must set out why the court should make the orders asked for.

Box C2.

*********************************************************************************

DETAILS TO FOLLOW TONIGHT

--------------------------------------------

 

 

**********************************************************************************

Edited by Andyorch
edited
Link to post
Share on other sites

so trying to totally hide the fact they have no default notice which is fatal to their claim...

 

that's nolans for you.

ofcourse you object poss via an IA yourself.

Edited by Andyorch
edited

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

further information

============

 

relevant rules

=========

 

9.10 How can a party ask the sheriff to make any other orders?

*************************************************************

(1) A party may ask the sheriff to make any other orders by sending an Incidental

Orders Application to the other party.

(2) That party must at the same time send the court a copy of the Incidental

Orders Application with evidence that it was sent to the other party (for

example a postal receipt or a copy of an email).

(3) If the party who has been sent the Incidental Orders Application objects to the

proposed orders, that party must send that Incidental Orders Application to

the court within 10 days of it being sent, setting out that objection.

(4) After considering the Incidental Orders Application, and any objection that

may have been sent, the sheriff may do one of three things:

(a) grant the application, and send written orders to the parties,

(b) refuse the application, and make no orders, or

© order the parties to appear at a discussion in court, where the sheriff

will consider whether to make any orders.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

20.6 How can you ask the court to consider other applications about provisional orders?

****************************************************************************************

 

(1) A party may make any other application mentioned in Part 1A of the

Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987a

or Part 1A of the Debt Arrangement and

Attachment (Scotland) Act 2002(b) by sending an Incidental Orders

Application to the court, the other party and any interested person.

(2) An interested person may make any other application mentioned in Part 1A

of the Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987 or Part 1A of the Debt Arrangement and

a 1987 c. 18 Part 1A was inserted by the Bankruptcy and Diligence etc. (Scotland) Act

2007 (asp 3), section 169.

 

Attachment (Scotland) Act 2002b by sending an Incidental Orders

Application to the court, the parties and any other interested person.

(3) When the court receives such an Incidental Orders Application, the sheriff

must order every person to whom the application was sent to appear at a

provisional orders discussion in court, where the sheriff will consider

whether to make any orders.

======================================================

also got a letter this morning from court Re. next hearing...it states...

===============================================

 

*The only disputed issue in this proof is whether the debit has been assigned from Tesco to the claimants*

===================================================================

incidental.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

so without me trawling thru..have they sent a copy of the notice of assignment both ways?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats not a Notice of Assignment...thats the portfolio sale from Tesco to Caboot...has no connection to your debt.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

seem.?

scan up what they send back that you related to all the 30 pages please

 

probably called notice of assignment not intimation

should be 2 sheets.

one from Tesco, one from cabot

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scottish Law DX thats what we call a Notice of Assignment ( Intimation of Assignment) either way they have not disclosed it

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

yea of course I understand that but I doubt cabot do hence the title of the letters they would have sent and skooch not able to find one entitled intimation. bet they are there sadly

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unlike notice of assignment (which is not necessary in order to create an equitable assignment), an assignation must be intimated before it creates a security interest in the asset.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?270695-Assignation-and-Intimation

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...