Sale of goods act 1979 as ammended

[paddyohdear]

Has anyone been to court in a consumer dispute section 14 not of satisfactory quality/not

fit for purpose where the product was faulty in the first 6 months where the

burden of proof is reversed how important would this be for the claimants case

[BankFodder]

I think you will have to give a much better explanation of the problem. Also, do you know that The Sale of Goods Act has now been superseded by the Consumer Rights Act?

[paddyohdear]

My situation is SOG where i feel at risk is discharging the burden of proof on the faulty

product this is what you make call a irregular case for many reasons quite heavy for an lip

so back to my original question at what point would burden of proof be established.

[dx100uk]

There is no burden of proof that's why they have to do an ind rpt at their own cost within 6mts

[paddyohdear]

And further more to make it more of a test i have had to study a Part 20,cpr 35/pt 36,calderbank offers/protected party/

mackenzie friend.litigant friend.instruct two expert witnesses and what makes this totally mad to outrageous both parties

have instructed the two SJE ,

Then to further do my box in i have 2 non parties in contempt of court where 1 has submitted a fake report so now

committal proceedings make kick off soon before trial date ,all over a consumer dispute.

The reason i ask about reversed burden of proof i have submitted 500 docs the defendant very little if i was to establish

reversal i could not see how they could succeed .

[dx100uk]

well as you've not told us all and bugger about the claim we cant ever be able to help