Jump to content


Sale of goods act 1979 as ammended


paddyohdear
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1457 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Has anyone been to court in a consumer dispute section 14 not of satisfactory quality/not

fit for purpose where the product was faulty in the first 6 months where the

burden of proof is reversed how important would this be for the claimants case

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you will have to give a much better explanation of the problem. Also, do you know that The Sale of Goods Act has now been superseded by the Consumer Rights Act?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My situation is SOG where i feel at risk is discharging the burden of proof on the faulty

product this is what you make call a irregular case for many reasons quite heavy for an lip

so back to my original question at what point would burden of proof be established.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no burden of proof that's why they have to do an ind rpt at their own cost within 6mts

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And further more to make it more of a test i have had to study a Part 20,cpr 35/pt 36,calderbank offers/protected party/

mackenzie friend.litigant friend.instruct two expert witnesses and what makes this totally mad to outrageous both parties

have instructed the two SJE ,

Then to further do my box in i have 2 non parties in contempt of court where 1 has submitted a fake report so now

committal proceedings make kick off soon before trial date ,all over a consumer dispute.

The reason i ask about reversed burden of proof i have submitted 500 docs the defendant very little if i was to establish

reversal i could not see how they could succeed .

Link to post
Share on other sites

well as you've not told us all and bugger about the claim we cant ever be able to help

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...