Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


paddyohdear

Sale of goods act 1979 as ammended

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 604 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Has anyone been to court in a consumer dispute section 14 not of satisfactory quality/not

fit for purpose where the product was faulty in the first 6 months where the

burden of proof is reversed how important would this be for the claimants case

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you will have to give a much better explanation of the problem. Also, do you know that The Sale of Goods Act has now been superseded by the Consumer Rights Act?


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My situation is SOG where i feel at risk is discharging the burden of proof on the faulty

product this is what you make call a irregular case for many reasons quite heavy for an lip

so back to my original question at what point would burden of proof be established.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no burden of proof that's why they have to do an ind rpt at their own cost within 6mts


..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And further more to make it more of a test i have had to study a Part 20,cpr 35/pt 36,calderbank offers/protected party/

mackenzie friend.litigant friend.instruct two expert witnesses and what makes this totally mad to outrageous both parties

have instructed the two SJE ,

Then to further do my box in i have 2 non parties in contempt of court where 1 has submitted a fake report so now

committal proceedings make kick off soon before trial date ,all over a consumer dispute.

The reason i ask about reversed burden of proof i have submitted 500 docs the defendant very little if i was to establish

reversal i could not see how they could succeed .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well as you've not told us all and bugger about the claim we cant ever be able to help


..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...