Jump to content


style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 309 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Well Jan '19 has come and gone. If the DCA haven't issued a claimform in time for their own stated SB deadline then they have shot themselves in the foot. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well Jan '19 has come and gone. If the DCA haven't issued a claimform in time for their own stated SB deadline then they have shot themselves in the foot. :)

 

Perhaps so.

 

It depends if this is the remedy date of the Section 87 notice. If the DN notice has a later remedy date, then the SB period will still be running.

 

There is something going on here, this is the third case I have seen like this in as many weeks.

Under the law as it now stands, a credit or auxiliary company can now delay the sending of a section 87until hell freezes over, without breaking any law or convention .

Some who issue the default notices at the same time as markers, can and do, issue markers at any time in accordance with the section 87.

 

This gives the DCA much more leverage when it comes to enforcement.


DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posts moved to your own thread....


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi, I have received a letter from Lantern to a sb letter I sent them. The letter talks about one debt from Wageday which it says will be statute barred in January 2019. The customer reference number on the letter has a balance for multiple debts but only the wageday debt is mentioned in the letter.

 

The letter says:

'

Dear xxxx

 

We write with regard to the above reference account number and recent communication.

 

We note that you feel the Wageday Advance account should now be statute barred under the (Limitation Act 1980/Prescription and Limitation Scotland Act 1973/The limitation (Northern Ireland) order 1989). Firstly it is important to explain that an account only becomes statute barred if the last written acknowledgment or payment towards the debt is over a six year period. In this case , the original due date was on xxxx/2013 and will therefor not become statute barred until xx/01/2019.

 

If you have an queries or need to talk to us, please get in touch.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Lantern

Debt Purchase & Recovery Specialists '

 

 

The debts that the customer reference number refers to have not been on my credit file for several years. Ihave not responded to the letter.

 

Will Lantern now put the Wageday account on my credit file and keep it on file for the next six years?

 

Can Lantern use their letter as an opportunity to open up other debts which they have not mentioned in the letter but which I know have been included in the total debt of the balance.? ( I think the debts that have not been mentioned are statute barred).

 

 

Thanking you in advance and as always.

 

This is very important to the OP.

 

If the date mentioned on here is the date on a Default notice, this account will NOT be statute barred. The six year commences on the Default notice date.

If, as I expect this post is deleted I advise you to ring "CAB or "National Debt line" and ask them, before going any further.

 

I have no idea why the team are saying this, perhaps they are confusing me for someone who makes errors on simple matters such as this.


DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well the op never returned...and..

 

if the debt buyer say its sb 'd in jan ….its now feb...so by their own placard ..its sb'd now..

end of the matter..

 

dx


PLEASE DONT HIT QUOTE IF THE LAST POST IS THE ONE YOU ARE REPLYING TOO.

MAKES A THREAD TWICE AS LONG TO SCROLL THROUGH!

please do not post jpg images directly to a topic..USE PDF ....READ UPLOAD.

 

WE CAN'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD - I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

Reclaim mis-sold PPI Read Here

Reclaim Bank Account, Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

The CAG Interest Tutorial Read Here

spreadsheets 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When was the case I have quoted DX? This is a Current issue? That is why I posted it, it should not be ignored, just because you do not like to read the new cases or legislation.

 

 

If you think I am wrong, lets hear why. Otherwise advise the member correctly.

 

 

As said before and confirmed this morning by NDL there is a lot of changing of enforcement methods happening because of this. You will see them in the next few months.

 

 

I have no issue with you or anyone else, it is merely information I am passing on, the same is available elsewhere.

Edited by Andyorch
Unnecessary quote

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will explain the whole situation in context the BMW and the current judgement if you wish, but after the debacle last time, I thought the ADNIN would object.

Edited by Andyorch
Unnecessary quote

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...