Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just as the title says, if ever there was a good reason to ditch Micro$oft and move to Linux then this is it :-   Giving Windows total recall is a privacy minefield • The Register WWW.THEREGISTER.COM It's only a preview, and maybe it should stay there ... forever Help is available, most modern PC's can run a version of Linux suitable for your needs and it is not difficult to use or learn. Ubuntu is popular, new version is very modern Garuda Linux is the one I use, based on Arch, rolling release, bang up to date. I have friends and acquaintances, old and young, PC Literate and not. Most people who try it never go back to Windows Hamster
    • I've had to hide two of your posts.  Anyone clicking on your links gets sent to external sites.  On top of that your real name is showing on one screenshot.  Fellow Site Team member dx100uk has already politely asked - Anyway, jk2054 wants to see the communication you got from your local court which will have told you about the hearing date of 17 June, and will have mentioned a deadline for filing your Witness Statement.
    • I believe it is helpful to seek guidance from a range of places and decide on the validity of the sources and frequency of responses which are most helpful. A single voice can be a dangerous thing. As, of course, can groupthink. Scott, it feels like £4k on a solicitor for a £1.5k bill is overkill. Were we back in time I'd suggest small claims court as your claim sounds like it may be straightforward? By all means add that phrase on. I also suggest you contact the court and go and sit in on a couple of similar cases to get a better understanding before you shell out.
    • a card should be 16 digits...urm... note your dates above please. do not miss them no matter what happens  ......................... pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northamton, civil national business centre Name of the Claimant ? PRA Group Uk Portfolios ltd. How many defendant's  joint or self ? self Date of issue –  21 May 24 date of AOS - 07-06-2024 date for filing defence by - 21-06-2024 Particulars of Claim 1. The claimant claims the sum of £5600 for an outstanding debt owed. 2. On Mar 2000 the Defendant entered into an agreement with Barclays Bank Uk PLC for a credit card under reference ( 11 digit ref ). 3. on Mar 21 the defendant defaulted on the agreement  with an outstanding balance of £5600. 4. On Aug 21 the debt £5600 was assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on Dec 23. 5. Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with S136 Law of Property act 1925. 6. The claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) Limited to act on its behalf in the recovery of the outstanding debt and to pursue litigation on its behalf. AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS 1. The sum of £5600 What is the total value of the claim? £6100  Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No - just emails threatening action   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Yes   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? no Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? credit card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? before - in 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I don't recall - I suspect post / online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? am awaiting access - but I suspect it is    Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. assigned - debt purchaser has issued the claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Pretty certain - Yes   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? pretty certain - Yes   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? there's been gaps - they went very quiet  Why did you cease payments? Covid lockdowns  What was the date of your last payment? i thought it was 2020 - they say 2021 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? no
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help please - Cabmate cab hire company refusing to return deposit

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2161 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

I will try and be as brief as possible with this.


My partner hired a taxi from a local cab hire firm back in July 2017.

He paid a deposit on taking the car.

The original car had a lot of problems and kept getting taken into the garage for repairs.

As it was licensed to another county, they could not provide another vehicle when repairs were being made and therefore could not work.


Another time with this particular car, was told it was repaired, filled the tank £50 and then it broke down again (no recovery or breakdown service offered either, despite paying £200 per week!).


They said they would get a replacement car, told it would be an Octavia - then given a Dacia Logan (may be fine for nipping around town) totally not cut out for taxi work! Still paying the same rent.


As he got licenced locally, he asked for a locally licensed car (to avoid past issues).

They dragged their heels with this and finally got given another Dacia in Jan 18 despite saying he didn't want another Dacia as it is majorly uncomfortable to work in.


Finally managed to get our own car plated so returned the car to taxi hire firm.

I emailed and checked account balance was zero and have email to confirm it was.

Contract states a period of 6 weeks for return of initial deposit.


Waited the six weeks, didn't get it,

I called and was told no it was 8 weeks and would be paid on a certain date.


Waited another two weeks, still nothing.

Called again and told the woman who deals with it is on holiday.


Chased again the following week to then get an email stating that as he did not keep the last car for 6 weeks that he would not be getting back his original deposit and also that he owed them about £150.


This figure is not correct and is due to their errors when car was taken in for repair etc half way through the week when rent was paid in advance.


I called CAB and they have told me to write letter to them with the argument that it was a continuation of the original contract as he had a car from them permanently from July 17 to Feb 18.


I just wondered if anyone can help me out with some wording for the letter to them.

I have heard that many other people have had trouble getting deposits back.

The company are highly unprofessional imo.


Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you should be recovering all of your losses.

Send them an SAR on Friday. Come back here when you have the data.

We can help you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks, should I not mention the return of the deposit in the letter? Just raise the SAR with them? I am not overly concerned with recovering other costs, just really want the deposit back. However maybe the threat of something larger may just make them cough it up....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Ok, I posted the letter recorded delivery on 25 May. I basically outlined the reasons why they should not be withholding the deposit. I gave them the option to refund, if not reverted to the SAR. The letter was sent to the local office that we dealt with and also a copy to the head office. No response from either...


So they are already in breach. What is the best way forward now please? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that you sent your SAR off as part of a larger letter. That is a shame because it could be that the SAR element was obscured by the rest of the message. It would be helpful if you could post up the letter the sent in PDF format – redacted for identifiers.


Also please could you tell us what kind of value we are dealing with here please. Can you list out each element of your losses. Also, did you lose any taxi business as a result of this?


Because you are probably seeing as a business, the case would have to be heard in their local court. Where are you? And where are they?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will post a copy of the letter up.

I feel that the SAR element was quite clear with the way that I set out the letter.


The original deposit was £200.

Money was invariably lost due to the lack of ability to work whilst cars were taken into the garage and no replacement was provided.


However I have not worked out all the days that the car was off the road but then they could state that this was clearly an issue due to the fact that the car was hired from another office which made offering a replacement difficult for them.


They are in Bristol centre and we are in Bristol also.

Check out their reviews on google and you will see that this is a regular stunt for them to pull. Cabmate T/A Claremont Executive.


Cabmate (UK) Limited

Unit A

Totterdown Bridge Trading Estate

Albert Road





25 May 2018


Dear Sir/Madam


Re: A N OTHER Client No: 12345/6789 – (ALL CAR REG'S INSERTED)



The deposit of £200 was paid to you on 21 June 2017 when I signed the contract relating to Volkswagen Passat (CAR REG INSERTED).


The deposit was paid in respect of this vehicle and on the original contract.


I had a car continuously from you from 21 June 2017 through to 7 February 2018.


Therefore this was a continuation of the original contract on which I paid the initial deposit.


I only changed from the original Volkswagen Passat due to numerous mechanical problems with the car which left me unable to work as you were unable to supply a replacement vehicle.


The last time that the car went in the garage (12 October 2017), I was told that the car was definitely fixed (as per text sent 12/10/17 at 14:54).


Following collection, I then filled the tank with fuel at Asda in Bedminster Bristol for an evening’s work (I have the receipt for this purchase).


The car failed yet again that evening and was returned to you with over £50 of fuel in the tank.


On 20 October 2017, I was then given the Dacia Logan (CAR REG INSERTED) with an empty fuel tank after being told that I would be receiving a dark green Skoda Octavia.


Had I have been informed in advance, I would not have agreed to receiving the Dacia Logan.


As this was brought from Newcastle, I either accepted this car or being left in a position where I was unable to work yet again.


I do not consider a Dacia Logan to be a car which is suitable for use as a taxi (new price of £6,995).


This is a budget car and not fit for purpose, the car had no central arm rest, no arm rest on the door, the seats were extremely uncomfortable, the suspension was extremely hard and whilst I had the car, many customers complained about it and it was even mentioned on my rider feedback on the Uber App and also had a reported issue about the car.


I found that I could not drive for many hours in the car as it was causing my back to hurt. For this reason, my partner ////// contacted STAFF MEMBER A by email on 11 & 12 December 2017 to request a different car, due to the Dacia Logan being so uncomfortable.


A replacement car was not provided until 9 January 2018, nearly a month after it was originally requested.


Originally I was told that you were replacing the Dacia with a grey Volkswagen Passat.


When I came to collect this car, I was told the mechanic was not there and the Passat had some problems and all you could offer was the white Dacia Logan (CAR REG INSERTED).


As this was a newer car, there would be a rent increase of £5 per week.

As this was slightly newer, I thought it may be better than the other Logan.

There was a slight improvement but not much.


With regards to the rent payments, as advised on a number of occasions.

All rent payments specified by STAFF MEMBER A were paid when due.


As rent is paid in advance, I had to rely on STAFF MEMBER A to confirm what payments were payable, this was due to the original problems and the sheer number of times the Passat was taken into the garage leaving me unable to work for extended periods.


This was also exacerbated by problems with your mechanic leaving and you needing to find a replacement as we were informed.


This caused further delays to the car being repaired, not to mention numerous times when incorrect insurance documents were provided or being provided late and in turn caused me further financial loss.


I enclose a copy of an email which ////////// sent to STAFF MEMBER A on 31 January 2018.


Her response on 1 February 2018 confirms that my account was all up to date aside from the payment which was due on 1 February 2018.


A payment of £200 was made after this email on 1 February 2018.

This meant that when the car was returned on 7 February 2018, there would have been a zero balance.


You will see from this same email that on 19 March 2018, my partner made enquiries about the return of the deposit as six weeks elapsed on 20 March 2018.


After the response from STAFF MEMBER A on 21 March 2018 saying that she would look into this, nothing further was received.


My partner then called and spoke to STAFF MEMBER B who confirmed that the deposit would be returned directly to his bank account on 3 April (8 weeks from date of return).


I waited until this date, no refund received so my partner called again on 5 April 2018 and spoke to STAFF MEMBER B, who told her that the lady who deals with refunds was on holiday and would be back the following week.


//////// asked that someone sort the refund out when the person returned to work and requested that someone call when this was completed.


As no call was received, she chased again on 10 April 2018.


I then received an email that there is an outstanding balance on my account of £129.33 and that I would not be receiving the return of my refund due to breach of contract.


Unless a new deposit is taken each time a new car is provided, this is deemed to be a continuation of the original contract dated 21 June 2017.


This states that the car must be kept for a minimum period of 6 weeks and I had a car from you continuously for a period of 33 weeks from 21 June 2017 to 7 February 2018 (aside the multiple times when you held the VW Passat in your garage for repair).


- I would never have had cause to change the VW Passat, it was the mechanical problems that prompted this change.


- The second car provided to me was not the car that I was told I would be receiving.


The Dacia Logan was not fit for purpose for the reasons outlined above and also the engine management light kept coming on.


This was confirmed verbally to STAFF MEMBER A also around the time a change of vehicle was requested..


- The third car provided to me was not the car that I was told that I would be receiving. This was also not fit for purpose.


I always paid the amounts stated by STAFF MEMBER A when requested (during the times when the car experienced mechanical faults) and rent payments were paid regularly in advance.


I have email confirmation from a member of your staff that my account was paid to date on 1 February 2018 and therefore I dispute that any monies are owed to you whatsoever.


Therefore I request that you return my £200 deposit without further delay.

Please refund this to my account as follows:-








Please supply me with copies of all the data which you hold on me in relation to any matter and in any form and for any period of time.


Please note that I require disclosure of any personal data which you hold on me for the entire period of my dealings with you.


This Subject Access Request includes

- but is not limited to any data you hold about me in respect of any matter and held in any form including; contracts, statements, notes, text messages, emails, screen notes, recordings, internal correspondence and external correspondence.


Please note that this Subject Access Request is not limited to the client number/registration references mentioned above but this information has been provided purely as a starting reference for you.


For the avoidance of doubt, and as stated above, this Subject Access Request requires disclosure of ALL personal data which you hold on me for the entire period of my dealings with you which spans from June 2017 through to February 2018 inclusive.


There is no applicable fee for this data disclosure – unless you feel that my request is manifestly unfounded, excessive or repetitive – in which case you have a duty to let me know without any delay.


Under the new GDPR regime, you must satisfy this data disclosure request as soon as possible and in any event within one month.


If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return however, you are not entitled to impose any formality upon me or to require that I complete any particular form or template before you comply with your statutory duty.


I also require you to confirm to me that you are processing my personal data, how you acquired it, for what purpose you are processing it and also to identify all the parties with whom you have shared it. You are required to provide this information regardless of whether you believe that the substantive disclosure satisfies the conditions which permit you to impose a charge.


I also require to know whether my data has been subject to any automatic processing which has resulted in decisions or suggested decisions being made in respect of me.


Also, has my personal data been used in any way to categorise me or to place me on any lists. If so, please explain.


Finally, I should remind you that you have a duty to make clear the meaning of any codes or shorthand which you use in relation to my personal data.


If I do not hear from you then I will assume that this Statutory Request is satisfactory and that the one month timescale has started.


If you fail to comply with all of your obligations, I will make an immediate complaint to the Information Commissioner about your statutory breach – and without any further notice to you. This may also lead to legal action in the county court.


Yours faithfully


Mr A N Other


Enclosure – Email transcription between ////// & STAFF MEMBER A (31 January-21 March 2018


cc. Claremont Executive Services Ltd t/a Cabmate – 233-236 Nestles Avenue, Hayes, UB3 4SH

Edited by dx100uk
Link to post
Share on other sites

get out of private hire

you'll never make a bean.


been there done that.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well although it is an SAR, it's a great shame that you decided to integrate it into some larger letter. An SAR is an important statutory request and really should be made on its own in a separate envelope to avoid any confusion or risk that the recipient will claim that they were reasonable in not appreciating the nature of what they were receiving.


On the basis that it is an SAR, I would suggest that you make an immediate complaint to the ICO. However, I would send Cabmate a warning that they have not heeded your SAR sent on XXX date, that you are making a complaint to the ICO but that you advise them, Cabmate, to comply with their statutory duties without any further delay.


I suggest that you get those letters off today.


I think you got a good basis for suing them but I think you need to begin by itemising your losses.


Please could you list out what you consider to be your losses – including loss of income. Put in a bullet pointed list so that it is detailed and we can see item by item what you're looking for.


When you calculate any loss of income you should also take into account any expenses that you might have incurred such as petrol, any tolls – et cetera which you should deduct from your projected loss of income.


Also you should start looking up the steps to take when bringing a small claim in the County Court. It's very straightforward – but you will see well advised to understand basic things that you will have to do and the timescales.


Also you want to make sure that this is an action you are prepared to take.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you actually sent a copy to Cabmates Registered Office Address as well as there Bristol Branch?


Cabmate (UK) Limited

3rd Floor

114A Cromwell Road




Company Number: 09154387


Companies House: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/09154387

Endole: https://suite.endole.co.uk/insight/company/09154387-cabmate-uk-limited

Open Corporates: https://opencorporates.com/companies/gb/09154387

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

On a separate note, when dealing with anything try to avoid a third party getting involved (partner)

Companies would happily speak to them but then scream "data protection " when challenged.

If they make a disclosure, most likely they would omit any communication with the partner (right or wrong)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...