Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lba


callum.golding
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6347 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I will be sending my Letter before action tommorow. Is the below necessary to include;

Furthermore, I shall submit a Consumer Credit Act 1974 complaint to the OFT upon the basis that you have failed to comply with the OFT's direction of 5 April 2006 and are therefore not a 'fit and proper person' to hold a consumer credit licence under the 1974 Act. If you do not understand what this means then seek advice from your legal department.

Also any other things I'm missing? I'm including a schedule of my charges without the interest added. Below is how I have ammended the template;

I am very disappointed that you have failed to respond to my letter of the 27/10/2006.

I now understand that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

 

I calculate that you have taken £1005 which you have charged me in overdraft interest for the sum which you have taken.

I am enclosing a copy of the schedule of the charges which I am claiming. I have already sent you a copy of this in my original letter, dated 27/10/2006.

 

I require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest.

 

Thanks for any help.

 

Callum

 

 

Won** Barclays claim-in FULL

1 week before court date

26th March 2007

Won ** Natwest claim-in FULL

After LBA

12th July 2007

...starting Alliance & Leicester claim

24th September 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't have to include the paragraph in Blue re the OFT.

 

However this paragraph is incorrect as it refers to interest and not the charges.

I calculate that you have taken £1005 which you have charged me in overdraft interest for the sum which you have taken.

Why are you modifying the library template ? I would suggest you copy it again only leaving out the Blue OFT paragraph.

 

Spotty

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Statement request 4th May

Prelim Letter sent 24th May

LBA 7th June

Thanks but no thanks letter sent 22 June

MCOL 22nd June

Claim acknowledged 26 June

AQ sent 2nd August

17 Nov Court Date Set for 29 Jan 2007

Settled in full 12/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for that. I assumed only some parts were relevant to my case.

 

Have there been cases where they have agreed repayment after you send the letter before action? I am confident about going all the way but just slightly worried about making sure I gather the right documents for the day of court.

 

Thanks again

 

Callum

Won** Barclays claim-in FULL

1 week before court date

26th March 2007

Won ** Natwest claim-in FULL

After LBA

12th July 2007

...starting Alliance & Leicester claim

24th September 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not heard of Barclays settling in full at the LBA stage. They are much more likely to offer you a partial settlement, and then sit back and let you file your claim.

 

But the chances of them putting in an appearance in court is remote to say the least. You will probably have to spend some time getting all the documents in order for the court "bundle", but you will have plenty of time to do all that, as the average time for a hearing seems to be 4 - 6 months!!

Preliminary Letter sent to Woolwich 05/06

LBA sent 19/06

Court claim filed 04/07 : Total £824.75

Acknowledgement of Service 27/07

Defence received 08/08

AQ filed 11/08

Barclays AQ filed 05/09

Hearing date 20/12

SETTLED IN FULL £840.49: 14/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only change I made to the prelim letter and will make to the LBA was the omission of this short paragraph:

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

 

It just seems a little histrionic, is there a very good reason for including it?

18/11/2006 Recieved Statements from Barclays.

20/11/2006 Sent Prelim for return of £575.

27/11/2006 Received offer of £290.

4/12/2006 Sent LBA.

8/1/2007 Filed Small Claim at court.

12/02/2007 Full settlemant from Barclay's.

12/02/2007 LBA sent to Mint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm very exicted about making sure everything is in order for the case. There was a guy on morning TV talking about how so many people are pulling this off.

 

I will remove that line then, thanks for the advice.

 

I take it I will need to read through the whole court bundle material very carefully. Will I have to stand up in court and say anything? I wouldn't be too confident at doing that so I hope not.

 

Thank

 

Callum

Won** Barclays claim-in FULL

1 week before court date

26th March 2007

Won ** Natwest claim-in FULL

After LBA

12th July 2007

...starting Alliance & Leicester claim

24th September 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very unlikely that you will ever appear in court. These bloodsuckers daren't set foot inside. If they lost, that would create a precedent, they would lose billions.

 

Spotty

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Statement request 4th May

Prelim Letter sent 24th May

LBA 7th June

Thanks but no thanks letter sent 22 June

MCOL 22nd June

Claim acknowledged 26 June

AQ sent 2nd August

17 Nov Court Date Set for 29 Jan 2007

Settled in full 12/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks for that. I recieved a letter from Barclays offering me half. I have inserted the correct sentance into the LBA.

 

Should I address the LBA to the customer relations manager that sent me the offer??

 

Cheers for any input

 

Callum

Won** Barclays claim-in FULL

1 week before court date

26th March 2007

Won ** Natwest claim-in FULL

After LBA

12th July 2007

...starting Alliance & Leicester claim

24th September 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah sorry about same Q in two threads. I'm going to stick with this one.

 

..right off with that letter tomorrow then. When I have sucessfully recovered my amount is it possible to continue posting here to give advice to others.

 

Thanks

 

Callum

Won** Barclays claim-in FULL

1 week before court date

26th March 2007

Won ** Natwest claim-in FULL

After LBA

12th July 2007

...starting Alliance & Leicester claim

24th September 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent my LBA yesterday stating my thanks for the offer but will only take the amount as a part-payment. I will now wait the 14 working days until starting my claim.

 

Its soooo hard turning down 510quids that could have been in my account the following day. Its just the thought of doubling it and standing my ground that pushed me to continue.

 

I understand that I should be reading through the court bundle soon, but am I right in saying that once I start my claim if Barclays do not respond in 14 days then I win by default and if they do acknowledge but don't respond following another 14 days I still win by default.

 

Let the battle commence.....

 

Regards

 

Callum

Won** Barclays claim-in FULL

1 week before court date

26th March 2007

Won ** Natwest claim-in FULL

After LBA

12th July 2007

...starting Alliance & Leicester claim

24th September 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not as cut and dried as your last post. God, I wish it was.

 

You file, then 5 days is allowed in which to serve on the Bank. That's regardless of whether they had it the next day.

 

It's then that your 14 days start in which time, the bank should acknowledge. However, if they don't, and you apply for Judgment, they can still acknowledge out of time and be allowed to carry on. Don't ask, it may seem unfair, but the system somehow allows this to happen.

 

It's at the expiry of the 5 + 14 day period that the final 14 day period begins during which time they should defend. The same goes here too - you can apply for Judgment and they defend after that and again are allowed to continue.

 

There are occasions though when they do forget, and the claim succeeds but now they'll ask that you agree to the judgment being set aside. In the same letter they will offer a full settlement. If that happens to you, you should allow them to have their set aside as now they will pay you in full. It is said that they'll get their set-aside regardless of your response and in doing so, the end result will be the same only delayed while the Court sets a future date to settle the claim.

To follow my case progress, click here to see where I'm at right now.

 

Welshman

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few days after I sent my letter stating I would still be claiming after their offer, I recieved the following letter.

 

"I am sorry you remain unhappy following our response to your compaint and note that whilst you are accepting the amount offered, you will be seeking the balance through the small claims court.

I confirm our offer made as a gesture of goodwill, and was in full and final settlement of your complaint. As such, I am unwilling to pay you the sum of £510 as an interim measure. I ackknowlege you require your claim to be settled in full. However, after carefull consideration, I regret that I am not able to increase our offer.

Should you wish to accept our offer of £510, please sign and return the acceptance form enclosed with our letter 21 November 2006. If you do not wish to accept our offer in full an final settlement, it would appear we are unable to reach a mutually accpeptable resoolution.

I appreciate this is not the response you were hoping for, but I trust I have fully explained the banks position."

 

Sounds like they mean to stand their gound. Shall I respond in anyway to this or wait for the 14 day deadline and begin a CLAIM ??

 

Thanks

 

Callum

Won** Barclays claim-in FULL

1 week before court date

26th March 2007

Won ** Natwest claim-in FULL

After LBA

12th July 2007

...starting Alliance & Leicester claim

24th September 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also when I begin my claim online do I need to send a schedule of charges to the bank again and some sort of information telling them I've begun a claim.

 

What happens if I get a court date and actually have to go. ahhhh worries!!!

 

Thanks for the help

 

Callum

Won** Barclays claim-in FULL

1 week before court date

26th March 2007

Won ** Natwest claim-in FULL

After LBA

12th July 2007

...starting Alliance & Leicester claim

24th September 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can send both the court and Barclays your schedule. The Court will tell Barclays you have filed a claim.

 

Don't worry about going to court - it is most unlikely.

 

Spotty

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Statement request 4th May

Prelim Letter sent 24th May

LBA 7th June

Thanks but no thanks letter sent 22 June

MCOL 22nd June

Claim acknowledged 26 June

AQ sent 2nd August

17 Nov Court Date Set for 29 Jan 2007

Settled in full 12/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...