Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CP+ ANPR PCN - Roadchef carpark Rownhams services Southampton 2/2/18 - Now DR+ DCA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2157 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

Thanks for allowing me here to post.

I have just received today in the post a forwarded letter from DRP Debt recovery Plus ltd. I have been living permanantly in France for over 6 months. The letter refers to a

Notice of Intended Court Action re an alleged unpaid parking fine on 2/2/18 at Roadchef Rownhams South (the motorway services in Southampton). Apparently, the driver remembers he stayed more than the free 2 hrs - just didnt think to get a ticket or mention it to me. GGGRRR.

 

The vehicle was registered to me, but not driven by me on this date, and I had no knowledge of anything till this letter arrived today.

They (DRP) state they sent me a letter on 10/4/18 (to my old address in UK) where I ceased to live since September. (forgot to tell DVLA).

They want me to pay £120.

Do I have to pay it?

Should I contact them?

Should I send them a letter at all?

 

Did have a look on Money Saving Expert but its very complicated and I didnt really understand. getting old, you know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG. I doubt if we're going to tell you to pay this, don't worry. :)

 

Could you post up the questions from the forum sticky with your answers please? It will help us to advise you.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket

 

Best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

read it properly

doesn't say FINE anywhere..if you are this far down the line

it might be better to simply continue to ignore them

until/unless you get a solicitors letter of claim

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never pay a dca, especially when they ask for more money than the contractual sum they are supposed to collect.

We would need to see the NTK they sent originally to determine whether the the PARKING CO stand a cat in hell's chance of chasing you for the money.

Once we know the full detaisl we will probably suggest that you give them your address in France and suggest that they will lose a fortune dragging you back across the channel for this because they will lose anyway.

 

We keep advising people to make sure they update addresses, use post forwarding etc but still we see a large number of posts that are complcated by these things. The parking co's take advantage of the situation once they get one of their letters sent back RTS and that then takes time and money to undo their wickedness

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello both, thanks for replies - I had to go lie down for a while, my heart was thumping and Ive had an awful day and came home to this letter.

 

The offence took place in the Roadchef carpark at Rownhams South services in Southampton on 2/2/18.

The Parking Company is CP Plus Ltd, and the debt recovery letter is from DRP Ltd.

 

My husband was driving a vehicle registered in my name and meeting the prospective new purchaser.

The vehicle was sold and the logbook changed that day.

 

Ive never received any earlier correspondence regarding this matter, as I no longer live in the UK registered address.

So - no Notice to keeper letter has been received.

Ive entered into NO correspondence with them.

 

The people who bought our house passed this unopened letter to our then solicitors who posted it onto me here in France.

 

I have no idea what was on the NTK letter (if there was one) or what evidence they have.

They say in this letter they sent a letter on 10/4/18, but I have no knowledge of such a letter.

 

This letter certainly makes no mention of the PoFA Act or Data Protection or GDPR or anything.

They want me to pay the unpaid parking charge of £120 by 9/5/18 or else they will pass their file back to their client with a recommendation to take further action against me.

Edited by dx100uk
Paras spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

now write one short simple letter informing CP+ of your current address

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to protect again a backdoor CCJ to the old address.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 8

that's all

inc the PCN ref no.

nothing more

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx is suggesting a short letter, I imagine something along the lines of..

 

Dear xxx

 

[Heading] - their reference

 

I wish to advise you that my address with immediate effect is

 

[your current address]

 

Yours faithfully/sincerely

 

I expect dx will advise if he thinks anything else should go in.

 

HB

Edited by honeybee13
Addition

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know what dx100uk is getting at here. And it's for you to have a bit of a giggle at CP+'s expense.

 

As you both now live in France, you can, with impunity, tell them your address and even who was driving if you wanted to (as he lives in France as well).

 

 

CP+ would have the right (if they wanted) to take you to County Court, but that would be a bit of a problem for them.

 

Normally, any case brought against you would be transferred to your local court. But that's not going to happen because you live in France. So, CP+, if they have your current French address, can issue proceedings in their local court, but you have the right to defend yourself in any case brought against you.

 

If they decided to go down the court route and lost (which is far more likely than they like to admit) they would then be lumbered with a bill for ALL of your reasonable expenses. Which could include air or tunnel fares, fuel, hotel accommodation etc etc. And there's not a chance in hell that they're going to take that risk.

 

Here's the letter I'd send to call their bluff.

 

 

Dear CP+

 

Ref PCN No: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Since XX/XX/XXXX I have been living in France, the vehicle was only in the UK as the driver was visiting friends.

 

Here is my current address for any further correspondence.

 

French Address

 

Any further communication regarding this matter should be addressed to me at the above address.

 

If you want to proceed beyond empty threats and take me to court, you should be aware that I will be claiming for all of my expenses incurred with regards my travel to the UK to fully defend the matter.

 

 

Signed

 

Keeper.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

aw someone sussed me....dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So, I have had a response.

 

Letter says

"Thank you for your communication regarding the PCN.

The time to challenge the charge has now expired and therefore access to an Independent Appeals Service is no longer available.

However, if you would like to discuss your communication with one of our operatives, please telephone XXXXXX.

Alternatively, the outstanding balance of £120.00 can be paid using the options on the bck of this letter.

 

Please note that any correspondence that does not provide further evidence will be noted and retained. I cannot guarantee that we will provide a response"

 

So, ignore?

Link to post
Share on other sites

good so they've now physically written to your address in france?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note that any correspondence that does not provide further evidence will be noted and retained. I cannot guarantee that we will provide a response"

 

I'd write back once more and say...

 

Ref: PCN #######

 

Dear CP+

 

Thank you for your letter dated XX/XX/XXXX saying that any further comment would be noted.

 

I would therefore refer you to the response given in Arkell v Pressdram.

 

 

 

No name, no signature, no nothing :lol:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:nono::nono:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope nothing more needs to be done. post 17 applies

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...