Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Dave, Yep .... Will have to do AOS tomorrow .... Are you referring to CPR 31.14 Request?
    • I don't think I've ever seen someone appeal a mags court decision on fare evasion, JK, but as you say in this case TiredDodo has pleaded guilty. It is possible to challenge, as below. HB Appeal a magistrates’ court decision: Overview - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK How to challenge a decision by a magistrates' court. Including how to get a fine reviewed, if you did not know about your case, how to appeal to the...  
    • Update! I have now opened the mail from Barclaycard. I am assuming that their letters were prompted by my confirmation to them of my change of address, which I had advised them of twice. They are treating my change of address notification as a "General Data Protection Regulation Right of Access Request"  and state that I have made a "Right of Access Request. They are asking me to provide valid indentity documents! I have made no such request and am minded to ignore their request for extra information? I should add that their letters were sent to my correct current address!
    • Are you allowed to appeal if you plead guilty?   I know you appeal the sentence, but the criminal record formed from your guilt would surely remain?   I'm not sure if your able to appeal a crimianl record if you plead guilty are you?
    • DX: I did not pursue Link after I got the CCJ amended to monthly payments. Pretty sure the CCJ does not mention reviews, I do have the CCJ somewhere, I will have to look it up in storage. It is as mentioned on the thread you referenced  in your post #28. The Barclays loan was taken out in September 2004 for 60 months! Current Balance remaining approx £2K. On checking back my past correspondence with Barclaycard about this loan, there was a history of them ignoring my letters and offers to pay, and I even had problems in obtaining their bank account details for them to accept my payments! I have received strange correspondence from them too, one referring to insurance which I did not have. They seem very disorganised! Barclaycard told me to pay "Masterloan" a while back and I now receive regular statements and arrears notices from "Personal Loans from Barclaycard" clearly marked Masterloan, they changed the account reference number! I have never requested a CCA on this account. I advised them of my change of address last September, but they are still sending, until today, statements etc. to my old address! I have received 2 letters from Barclaycard Loan today though, not opened them yet!!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EE mobile debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1490 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All, I had a mobile phone account with EE original with T mobile for over 20 years never missed a payment.

 

got into financial difficulties and asked EE for help with a payment plan which they set up.

I was not able to pay on time the second month of set up due to uncleared funds

 

rang them to keep them informed they were helpful at first and promised to call me the following day to take payment and carry on with the plan.

They did nt call me

 

I rang them only to be told the plan had been cancelled and I needed to pay the full amount due which was £194.

I informed them I could not pay that much at once so they cut off my phone and sold the debt to moorcroft .

Moore Croft have increased the debt to £830.

you help with a plan of action?

 

Thanks

 

El.

Link to post
Share on other sites

moved to telecom

Moorcroft don't buy debts

who are their named client?

 

they cant add anything either

 

I suspect its still with EE and 'extra amount'

is all the monthly payments till end of contract' which they cant charge anyway as theres no service you can use.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter is from Moorcroft debt recovery limited re EE (formerly t-mobile) this is about the 3rd letter I had from them this one is asking for full payment of£830 and offering possible discount.

 

Can you help me with how I should respond?

 

Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
quote
Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't

who are moorcrofts client on their letters

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please stop panicking, Moorcr@p can do sweet FA with this, you can IGNORE their dumb letters, WHO IS THEIR CLIENT!!!

 

EE couldn't care less about your loyalty for 20 years, you're a number that makes them profit, nothing else.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then deal with EE direct, if needs be send them a SAR and find out how that figure has quadrupled, and if they say it's because they've added the remaining contract period, then they will have to take that back off.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

opened

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought this had gone away but Llowell have sent a letter to my daughters address, I have never lived there and although I moved address 18 months ago all my mail was being redirected so I know they have never sent anything to the address the contract was under.

 

They must have checked my credit file for some reason as many years ago I took out a contract phone with 3 mobile in my name for my daughter as a present and paid it for the first year she has paid it ever since.

 

The letter is giving me 30 days to make contact or they may issue a claim.

The amount they are asking for is £794.00

 

I intend to write to them asking for a detailed break down of the invoice and for a copy of the assigment notice as they say the account has been assigned to them.

 

Should I be asking for a copy that should have been sent to me by EE?

I dont understand why they would write to me at my daughters when all correspondence in the past fromm EE and Moorcroft has been to my previous (the contract) address unless they were trying to get a back door ccj.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I sent a letter to Llowell as per above.

 

From their reply here is a short breakdown of what Llowell have done.

 

Sent letters to a different address to the one associated with the ee account.

Registered a default at that address.

Sent a copy of the letter informing account asigned to them with no date of assignment.

 

They are quoting a mobile number completely different to the one I had with EE yet quoting the correct address associated with the account.

 

The breakdown of the charge they are trying to get me to pay is £129 airtime debt £626 early termination fee.

 

I have asked for copy invoices and the letter of assigment from EE which they say they requested meanwhile activity on the account is suspended. 

 

Do I let them crack on all the way to court and then make them aware of the errors?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cant charge for termination fees they know they are unlawful and will drop the claim at the lastminute.

 

make sure you write informing them of your correct address.

then await if/when they issue a PAPLOC letter of claim

which they must do 1st before a court claim

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter from lowells Solicitors today which says further to your Pre Action Protocol Reply Form our client has not yet been able to provide us with a full response and has requested that we return your case to them, their client being Lowell Portfolio 1 ltd.  

 

Guess I just wait now to see if they start chasing for payment again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So returning it to themselves :biggrin1:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

damn the mug found CAG ....again...we got rumbled trying to fleece another mug!!  :pound:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...